green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Linville v. State
See State v. Reier, 127 *1077 Wash.App. 753, 757-58, 112 P.3d 566 (2005), review denied, 156 Wash.2d 1019 , 132 P.3d 735 (2006). ¶ 21 Our review begins with the statute's or regulation's plain language.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Armantrout v. Carlson
Co., 60 Wash. 552, 554 , 111 P. 788 (1910); Masunaga v. Gapasin, 57 Wash.App. 624, 628 , 790 P.2d 171 (1990). [9] Grant v. Libby, McNeill & Libby, 145 Wash. 31, 38 , 258 P. 842 (1927). [10] Bortle, 60 Wash. at 554 , 111 P. 788 ; see also id. at 556 , 111 P. 788 (paraphrasing the earlier stated rule and adding the word "financial"). [11] Masunaga, 57 Wash.App. at 629 , 790 P.2d 171 . [12] Id. at 628 , 790 P.2d 171 . [13] See Mitchell v. Rice, 183 Wash. 402 , 48 P.2d 949 (1935) (issue of dependency properly reserved for the jury when there was substantial evidence that the father depended on mon…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CITY OF SPOKANE
v.
WHITEHEAD.
v.
WHITEHEAD.
77438-2.
Washington Supreme Court.
Mar 8, 2006.
Published
Disposition of petition for review denied.