State v. Vanknowe, 163 P.3d 794 (Wash. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Vanknowe, 163 P.3d 794 (Wash. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Teel v. STADING (washctapp, 2010-04-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Teel v. STADING
Wash. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Compare Lamm v. McTighe, 72 Wash.2d 587, 592-93 , 434 P.2d 565 (1967) (stating the elements of a boundary line mutual recognition and acquiescence claim) with Chaplin, 100 Wash.2d at 857 , 676 P.2d 431 (stating the elements of an adverse possession claim); see also Campbell v. Reed, 134 Wash.App. 349, 361-63 , 139 P.3d 419 (2006) (analyzing adverse possession and boundary line mutual recognition and acquiescence claims separately), review denied, 160 Wash.2d 1023 , 163 P.3d 794 (2007). ¶ 8 Next, we review questions of law de novo.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
VANKNOWE. STATE v. WALKER.
79445-6.
Washington Supreme Court.
Jul 11, 2007.
163 P.3d 794
Published

Disposition of petition for review denied.