green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Baker
(2×)
See State v. Adams, 2007 UT App 117, ¶ 19 , 158 P.3d 1134 (Orme, J., dissenting) ("If football is a game of inches, Fourth Amendment jurisprudence can be a matter of seconds."), cert. denied, 168 P.3d 1264 (Utah 2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Baker
See generally State v. Baker, 2007 UT App 35U, 2007 WL 416682 (per curiam), cert. denied, 168 P.3d 1264 (Utah 2007). ¶ 2 “[R]es. judicata ... refer[s] to the overall doctrine of the preclusive effects to be given to judgments. [It] has two branches: claim preclusion and issue preclusion.” Brigham Young Univ. v. Tremco Consultants, Inc., 2005 UT 19, ¶ 25 , 110 P.3d 678 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GEDO
v.
ROSE.
v.
ROSE.
20070545.
Utah Supreme Court.
Aug 30, 2007.
Published
Petition for certiorari denied.