green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.9 score
“nrichment alone will not trigger the doctrine; the enrichment must be unjust under the circumstances and as between the two parties.”
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Davenport v. Washington Educ. Ass'n
nrichment alone will not trigger the doctrine; the enrichment must be unjust under the circumstances and as between the two parties.
discussed
Cited "see"
Grondal v. United States
See Dragt v. Dragt/DeTray, LLC, 139 Wash.App. 560, 571 , 161 P.3d 473 (2007), review denied, 163 Wash.2d 1042 , 187 P.3d 269 (2008) (Mutual modification of a contract by subsequent agreement arises out of the intentions of the parties and requires a meeting of the minds and separate consideration); Wagner v. Wagner, 95 Wash.2d 94, 103 , 621 P.2d 1279 (1980); Hanson v. Puget Sound Navigation Co., 52 Wash.2d 124, 127, 323 P.2d 655 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fawn Lake Maintenance Com'n v. Abers
See Dragt v. Dragt/DeTray, LLC, 139 Wash.App. 560, 571 , 161 P.3d 473 (2007), review denied, 163 Wash.2d 1042 , 187 P.3d 269 (2008) (citations omitted) (holding that contract modification requires meeting of the minds and separate consideration).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ELSEMORE
v.
GRENELL.
v.
GRENELL.
80868-6.
Washington Supreme Court.
Jun 4, 2008.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Washington (1)
Disposition of petition for review. Denied.