green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Chatterjee v. King
See Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Carlsbad, 2009-NMCA-097, ¶ 11 , 147 N.M. 6 , 216 P.3d 256 ("We seek to give meaning to all parts of the statute, such that no portion is rendered surplusage or meaningless."), cert. denied, 2009-NMCERT-007 , 147 N.M. 363 , 223 P.3d 360 . {15} Indeed, if we were to read Subsection (L) as Petitioner requests, granting a nonadoptive or non-natural parent standing to bring a custody claim, we would be rendering meaningless the Legislature's limitation of standing to adoptive and natural parents.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chatterjee v. King
(2×)
See Int’l Ass’n of Firefighters v. City of Carlsbad, 2009-NMCA-097, ¶ 11 , 147 N.M. 6 , 216 P.3d 256 (“We seek to give meaning to all parts of the statute, such that no portion is rendered surplusage or meaningless.”), cert. denied, 2009-NMCERT-007 , 147 N.M. 363 , 223 P.3d 360 . {15} Indeed, if we were to read Subsection (L) as Petitioner requests, granting a non- adoptive or non-natural parent standing to bring a custody claim, we would be rendering meaningless the Legislature’s limitation of standing to adoptive and natural parents.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tafoya
(2×)
Under Section 32-3-34(L)(o), fifteen enumerated offenses, which otherwise would be categorized as nonviolent offenses, may be treated as serious violent offenses “when the nature of the offense and the resulting harm are such that the court judges the crime to be a serious violent offense for the purpose of [the EMDA].” “The courts have no further role in the administration of the EMDA or in determining the amount of good time that may be earned as to any convicted offense.” Rudolfo, 2008-NMSC-036, ¶ 37 , 144 N.M. 305 , 187 P.3d 170 (emphasis added); see also State v. Solano, 2009-NMC…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ALBQ. COMMONS
v.
CITY OF ALBQ.
v.
CITY OF ALBQ.
31,724 (COA 24,026) (COA 24,027) (COA 24,042) (COA 24,425).
New Mexico Supreme Court.
Jul 1, 2009.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Writ Granted.