green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Figueroa v. Thi of New Mexico
See Rivera v. Rivera, 2010-NMCA-106, ¶¶ 20-26 , 149 N.M. 66 , 243 P.3d 1148 (concluding that a premarital agreement was valid, but unenforceable as unconscionable, because the agreement restricted the husband’s right to spousal support, and was therefore against the public policy of our state), cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-010 , 149 N.M. 64 , 243 P.3d 1146 ; Manzano Indus., Inc. v. Mathis, 101 N.M. 104, 104 , 678 P.2d 1179, 1179 (1984) (“This Court has, however, refused to enforce the literal terms of such [otherwise enforceable] contracts when to do so would work an unfairness which shocks…
discussed
Cited "see"
Figueroa v. THI of NM at Casa Arena Blanca, LLC
See Rivera v. Rivera, 2010-NMCA-106, ¶¶ 20-26 , 149 8 N.M. 66 , 243 P.3d 1148 (concluding that a premarital agreement was valid, but unenforceable as unconscionable, because the agreement restricted the husband’s right to spousal support, and was therefore against the public policy of our state), cert. denied, 2010- NMCERT-010, 149 N.M. 64 , 243 P.3d 1146 ; Manzano Indus., Inc. v. Mathis, 101 N.M. 104, 104 , 678 P.2d 1179, 1179 (1984) (“This Court has, however, refused to enforce the literal terms of such [otherwise enforceable] contracts when to do so would work an unfairness which shoc…
discussed
Cited "see"
Figueroa v. THI of New Mexico
See Rivera v. Rivera, 2010-NMCA-106, ¶¶ 20-26 , 149 N.M. 66 , 243 P.3d 1148 (concluding that a premarital agreement was valid, but unenforceable as unconscionable, because the agreement restricted the husband’s right to spousal support, and was therefore against the public policy of our state), cert. denied, 2010- NMCERT-010, 149 N.M. 64 , 243 P.3d 1146 ; Manzano Indus., Inc. v. Mathis, 101 N.M. 104, 104 , 678 P.2d 1179, 1179 (1984) (“This Court has, however, refused to enforce the literal terms of such [otherwise enforceable] contracts when to do so would work an unfairness which shocks…
discussed
Cited "see"
Strausberg v. Laurel Healthcare Providers, LLC
See Corum v. Roswell Senior Living, LLC, 2010-NMCA-105, ¶¶ 3, 16 , 149 N.M. 287 , 248 P.3d 329 (stating that the party attempting to compel arbitration has the burden to demonstrate a valid agreement to arbitrate), cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-010 , 149 N.M. 64 , 243 P.3d 1146 ; DeArmond, 2003-NMCA-148, ¶ 9 (stating that party relying on a contract has the burden to prove it is legally valid and enforceable).
discussed
Cited "see"
Strausberg v. Laurel Healthcare Providers, LLC
See Corum v. Roswell Senior Living, LLC, 2010-NMCA-105 , 5 ¶¶ 3, 16, 149 N.M. 287 , 248 P.3d 329 (stating that the party attempting to compel arbitration has the burden to demonstrate a valid agreement to arbitrate), cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT- 010, 149 N.M. 64 , 243 P.3d 1146 ; DeArmond, 2003-NMCA-148, ¶ 9 (stating that party relying on a contract has the burden to prove it is legally valid and enforceable).
cited
Cited "see"
Maese v. Garrett
See Corum v. Roswell Senior Living, LLC, 2 2010-NMCA-105, ¶ 16 , __ N.M. __, 248 P.3d 329 , cert. denied, 2010-NMCERT-010 , 3 149 N.M. 64 , 243 P.3d 1146 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL UNION
v.
REGENTS.
v.
REGENTS.
32,593.
New Mexico Supreme Court.
Oct 7, 2010.
Published
Denial of Certiorari.