State v. Knapp, 245 P.3d 775 (Wash. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Knapp, 245 P.3d 775 (Wash. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · "Because the instruction at issue is not ambiguous and . . . is a correct statement of law, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to further clarify the instruction for the jury."
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Campbell (washctapp, 2011-09-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Campbell
Wash. Ct. App. · 2011 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
because the instruction at issue is not ambiguous and . . . is a correct statement of law, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to further clarify the instruction for the jury.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
KNAPP.
85153-1.
Washington Supreme Court.
Jan 5, 2011.
245 P.3d 775
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Washington (1)

Disposition of Petition for Review Denied.