State v. Jackson, 247 P.3d 774 (Utah 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Jackson, 247 P.3d 774 (Utah 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Francis (utahctapp, 2012-08-02)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Francis
Utah Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Garcia, 2010 UT App 196, ¶ 11 , 236 P.3d 853 , cert. denied, 247 P.3d 774 (Utah 2011). ¶ 4 Under Utah law, burglary is a third degree felony "unless it was committed in a dwelling, in which event it is a felony of the second degree." Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-202 (2).
cited Cited "see" State v. Featherhat
Utah Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Maese, 2010 UT App 106, ¶ 13 , 236 P.3d 155 , cert. denied, 247 P.3d 774 (Utah 2011). 4 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Big Game Forever v. Peterson
Utah Ct. App. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Golden Meadows Props., LC v. Strand, 2010 UT App 257, ¶ 17 , 241 P.3d 375 (stating that an appellant who “fails to attack the district court’s reasons” for its ruling “cannot demonstrate that the district court erred”), cert. denied, 247 P.3d 774 (Utah 2011). ¶20 Big Game’s argument on balancing in the commercial-information context is limited to the assertions that it “derives economic value from keeping the names of its subcontractors confidential” and that “[c]onsidering the consequences to Big Game if these names were disclosed, Big Game’s interest in prevent…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Cooper
Utah Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Geukgeuzian, 2004 UT 16, ¶ 9 , 86 P.3d 742 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also State v. Maese, 2010 UT App 106, ¶ 12 , 236 P.3d 155 (determining that the defendant invited any error in the jury instructions when, in response to the court's question, defense counsel affirmatively approved the jury instructions, but then on appeal, attempted to argue the jury instructions contained an error), cert. denied, 247 P.3d 774 (Utah 2011). 110 "Affirmative representations that a party has no objection to the proceedings fall within the seope of the invited error doctrin…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
JACKSON.
20101030.
Utah Supreme Court.
Feb 16, 2011.
247 P.3d 774
Published

Petition for certiorari denied.