Dep't of Human Servs. v. DMG, 274 P.3d 857 (Or. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Dep't of Human Servs. v. DMG, 274 P.3d 857 (Or. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
98 citation events (98 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dept. of Human Services v. C. N. (orctapp, 2022-12-29) · Strongest negative: Hale v. Belleque (orctapp, 2013-09-25)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Hale v. Belleque
Or. Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see State v. Phillips, 242 Or App 253 , 255 P3d 587 (2011), rev allowed, 351 Or 586 (2012) (hitting the victim and actually facilitating the attack on the victim were merely alternative methods of meeting one of the elements of third-degree assault).
discussed Cited "see" Dept. of Human Services v. C. N.
Or. Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dept. of Human Services v. N. S., 246 Or App 341, 351 , 265 P3d 792 (2011), rev den, 351 Or 586 (2012) (“[A] parent’s [m]ere participation in services * * * is not sufficient to establish adequate progress toward reunification.” (Internal quotation marks omitted; second bracket and ellipses in N. S.)).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Edwards
Or. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Phillips, 242 Or App 253, 258-59 , 255 P3d 587 (2011), rev allowed, 351 Or 586 (2012) (unpreserved challenge to accomplice liability instruction not subject to plain error review where the defendant did not except to the giving of that instruction).
discussed Cited "see" STATE EX REL. DLCD v. Linn County
Or. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Friends of Polk County v. Oliver, 245 Or App 680, 693 , 264 P3d 165 (2011), rev den, 351 Or 586 (2012) (reasoning that value that the claimant gave up as part of the settlement of a condemnation action that was attributable to a particular phase of the development was properly included in the numerator of the expenditure ratio).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Alonzo
Or. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Phillips, 242 Or App 253, 258-59 , 255 P3d 587 (2011), rev allowed, 351 Or 586 (2012) (unpreserved challenge to accomplice liability instruction not subject to plain error review where the defendant did not except to the giving of that instruction).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
v.
D.M.G.
S059883.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Feb 16, 2012.
274 P.3d 857
Published

Petition for Review Denied.