discussed Cited "see" Wemple Ex Rel. Dang v. Dahman (2×) See State v. Yamada, 99 Hawai'i 542, 553 , 57 P.3d 467, 478 , recons, denied, 100 Hawai'i 295 , 59 P.3d 930 (2002) (“[I]t is a cardinal rule of statutory interpretation that, where the terms of a statute are plain, unambiguous and explicit, we are not at liberty to look beyond that language for a different meaning.