Mears v. Marshall, 921 P.2d 966 (Or. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Mears v. Marshall, 921 P.2d 966 (Or. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Janice M. MEARS, Petitioner on Review,
v.
William R. MARSHALL, M.D. and Collagen Corporation, Respondents on Review.
CC 9307-04839 CA A85078 SC S43073.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Aug 29, 1996.
Published opinion
921 P.2d 966
1996 Ore. LEXIS 87
Carson, C.J., and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber and Durham.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Maureen Leonard and Kathryn J. Clarke, Portland, filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Eric J. Neiman, of Tooze Shenker Duden Creamer Frank & Hutchison, Portland, and Joe W. Redden, Jr., of Beck, Redden & Secrest, Houston, filed a response for respondent on review Collagen Corporation.

Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, GRABER and DURHAM, JJ.[**]

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. ___, 116 S.Ct. 2240, 135 L.Ed.2d 700 (1996).

[**] Unis, J., retired June 30, 1996, and did not participate in this decision.