green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Commonwealth v. Doa
See Floyd, 508 Pa. at 393, 399-405 (Nix, C J., concurring) and 405-408, 498 A.2d 816 at 819-822 and 823-824 (Larsen, J., concurring); Commonwealth v. Gee, 467 Pa. at 136, n. 5 , 354 A.2d at 880 n. 5 (Eagan, J., plurality opinion) and 467 Pa. 123, 143-146 , 354 A.2d 875, 884-886 (Roberts, J., dissenting) (”[W]e should admit the prior inconsistent statements of witnesses as evidence concerning the matters contained in the statement."); Commonwealth v. Thirkield, 502 Pa. 542, 543 , 467 A.2d 323, 324 (1983) (McDermott, J., dissenting) (“Limiting the admissibility of prior inconsistent statemen…
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Oum, K.
See Common wealth v. Thil'kield, supra at 502 Pa. 542 , 467 A,2d 323 (McDennott, 1. dissenting: 'the fact that [the oath and Cross- examination requirement] are supp lied in u\e current trial defuses hearsay concerns and provides the ract-finder with ample opportunity to determine truth.').
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Jones
See Commonwealth v. Thirkield, supra at 502 Pa. 542 , 467 A.2d 323 [ (1983) ] (McDermott, J. dissenting: “the fact that [the oath and cross-examination requirements] are supplied in the current trial defuses hearsay concerns and provides the fact-finder with ample opportunity to determine truth.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Black
(2×)
See Fraternal Order of Police v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Bd., 71 Pa.Commw. 316, 454 A.2d 686 (1983), aff'd, 502 Pa. 541 , 467 A.2d 323 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Brady
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Thirkield, supra at 502 Pa. 542 , 467 A.2d 323 (McDermott, J. dissenting: “the fact that [the oath and cross-examination requirements] are supplied in the current trial defuses hearsay concerns and provides the fact-finder with ample opportunity to determine truth.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, CONFERENCE OF PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD LODGES, Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Intervenor.
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Intervenor.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 15, 1983.
Roberts, C.J., and Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson and Zappala.
Published
P. Richard Wagner, Anthony Busillo, II, Harrisburg, for appellant.
William J. Maikovich, Harrisburg, for appellee.
Robert J. Schwartz, Deputy Atty. Gen., for intervenor.
Before ROBERTS, C.J., and NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON and ZAPPALA, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed, 71 Pa.Cmwlth. 316, 454 A.2d 686.
LARSEN, J., dissents.