Landay v. Rite Aid, 73 A.3d 577 (Pa. 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Landay v. Rite Aid, 73 A.3d 577 (Pa. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
Quick Summary
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Rivera, J., No. 3067 EDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. July 20, 2016)
How cited ↗
Cited for
the laws that are in force at the time the parties enter into a contract are merged with the other obligations that are specifically set forth in the agreement.no pin page on record · 2 citing cases listed
  • Com. v. Rivera, J., No. 3067 EDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. July 20, 2016).unpublished 2 cites
    (the laws that are in force at the time the parties enter into a contract are merged with the other obligations that are specifically set forth in the agreement.)
  • Commonwealth v. Nase, 104 A.3d 528 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014).published 2 cites
    (the laws that are in force at the time the parties enter into a contract are merged with the other obligations that are specifically set forth in the agreement.)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“the laws that are in force at the time the parties enter into a contract are merged with the other obligations that are specifically set forth in the agreement.”quoted beside the cite; not in this opinion · 2 citing cases listed
  • Com. v. Rivera, J., No. 3067 EDA 2015 (Pa. Super. Ct. July 20, 2016).unpublished 2 cites
    “the laws that are in force at the time the parties enter into a contract are merged with the other obligations that are specifically set forth in the agreement.”
  • Commonwealth v. Nase, 104 A.3d 528 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014).published 2 cites
    “the laws that are in force at the time the parties enter into a contract are merged with the other obligations that are specifically set forth in the agreement.”
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David M. LANDAY and Patberg Carmody & Ging
v.
RITE AID
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 27, 2013.
Published opinion
73 A.3d 577
2013 WL 4522541
2013 Pa. LEXIS 1839
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (2)

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of August, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Does the Medical Records Act apply to a pharmacy’s provision of copies of records?
(2) Under the Medical Records Act, may a pharmacy charge a flat fee for the reproduction of pharmacy records if it gives the customer an invoice setting forth the fee and the customer reviews and pays the invoice without objection before receiving the pharmacy records?