Callison v. Peeples, 86 S.E. 635 (S.C. 1915). · Go Syfert
Search
Callison v. Peeples, 86 S.E. 635 (S.C. 1915). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Huggins v. Superior Court, 788 P.2d 81 (Ariz. 1990)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 637 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Huggins v. Superior Court, 788 P.2d 81 (Ariz. 1990).published
    This element has led the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts to reject proration in favor of nullification and resubmission to the voters “ ‘whenever the irregularity ... of the election is such that the result ... would be placed in d…
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CALLISON
v.
PEEPLES
9208.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Oct 14, 1915.
Published opinion
86 S.E. 635
1915 S.C. LEXIS 202
Mr. R. H. Welch, for appellants,, Messrs. Grier, Park & Nicholson, for respondents,
Hydrick.
Published

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

The opinion of the Circuit Court satisfactorily disposes of all the questions properly before this Court and necessary to the decision.

Judgment affirmed.

Footnote.—As to effect on election of wrongful disqualification of sufficient number of voters to have changed the result, see note in 38 L. U. A. (N. S.). 1007.