green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. D.F. Zee's, Inc.
See NLRB v. Don Burgess Construction Corp., 596 F.2d 378 , 384 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 293 , 62 L.Ed.2d 306 (1979)(single employee test); Sun-Maid Growers of California v. NLRB, 618 F.2d 56, 59 (9th Cir.1980)(joint employer test); and Kaplan v. International Alliance of Theatrical and Stage Employees of the United States and Canada, 525 F.2d 1354 , 1360 (9th Cir.l975)(agency theory).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, District Lodge No. 190, Local Lodge No. 1414, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. Don Burgess Construction Corp., 596 F.2d 378 , 386 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 293 , 62 L.Ed.2d 306 (1979); accord, Universal Security Instruments, Inc. v. NLRB, 649 F.2d 247 , 253 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 965 , 102 S.Ct. 506 , 70 L.Ed.2d 380 (1981); Lammert Industries v. NLRB, 578 F.2d 1223, 1225 (7th Cir.1978); NLRB v. R.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
See NLRB v. Don Burgess Construction Corp., 596 F.2d 378 , 386 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 293 , 62 L.Ed.2d 306 (1979); accord, Universal Security Instruments, Inc. v. NLRB, 649 F.2d 247 , 253 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 965 , 102 S.Ct. 506 , 70 L.Ed.2d 380 (1981); Lammert Industries v. NLRB, 578 F.2d 1223, 1225 (7th Cir.1978); NLRB v. R.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Erectors, Inc.
See NLRB v. Don Burgess Construction Corp., 596 F.2d 378 , 383 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 293 , 62 L.Ed.2d 306 (1979) (quoting NLRB v. Anthony Co., 557 F.2d 692, 695 (9th Cir.1977) (NLRB credibility determinations will be sustained *1465 by this court “unless found to be inherently incredible or patently unreasonable” (citations omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Al Bryant, Inc., Harrisburg Drywall and Construction Corporation, and Al Bryant Associates, Inc.
South Prairie Construction Co. v. Local No. 627, International Union of Operating Engineers, 425 U.S. 800 , 96 S.Ct. 1842 , 48 L.Ed.2d 382 (1976); see NLRB v. Don Burgess Construction Corp., 596 F.2d 378 , 384 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 940 , 100 S. Ct. 293 , 62 L.Ed.2d 306 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Aaron L. Katz, and v. The Bank of California, National Trust and Savings Association, And
See NLRB v. Don Burgess Construction Corp., 596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 293 , 62 L.Ed.2d 306 (1979) (applying general rule for commencement of federal periods of limitations). 1 We need not reach this issue because even applying the more expansive “discovery” rule, the district properly dismissed Katz’ complaint.
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Associated General Contractors Of California, Inc.
See NLRB v. Don Burgess Construction Corp., 596 F.2d 378 , 384-86 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 293 , 62 L.Ed.2d 306 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc.
See NLRB v. Don Burgess Construction Corp., 596 F.2d 378 , 384-86 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 293 , 62 L.Ed.2d 306 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Hatch
(2×)
(See People v. Serrato (1973) 9 Cal.3d 753, 761 , 109 Cal.Rptr. 65 , 512 P.2d 289 , overruled on other grounds in People v. Fosselman (1983) 33 Cal.3d 572, 583, fn. 1 , 189 Cal. Rptr. 855 , 659 P.2d 1144 ; see also Veitch v. Superior Court (1979) 89 Cal.App.3d 722, 730-731 , 152 Cal.Rptr. 822 [granting a new trial based on a reweighing of the evidence does not bar retrial], cert. den. (1979) 444 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 293 , 62 L.Ed.2d 306 .) In applying these principles, we have not distinguished between trial and appellate court determinations of legal insufficiency because both courts must app…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shirley Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., and Local Union No. 1, Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers' International Union of America
Both parties note the general rule that the limitations period begins to run “... when the claimant discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation].” Hungerford v. United States, 307 F.2d 99, 102 (9th Cir.1962); see also N.L.R.B. v. Don Burgess Construction Corp., 596 F.2d 378, 382 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 293 , 62 L.Ed.2d 306 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sohio Petroleum Co., a Division of Sohio Natural Resources Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Beck Corp. v. NLRB, 590 F.2d 290 , 293 (9th Cir. 1978); see also NLRB v. Don Burgess Const. Corp., 596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 293 , 62 L.Ed.2d 306 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc., Store No. 29-9
See also NLRB v. Don Burgess Const. Corp., 596 F.2d 378 , 386 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 293 , 62 L.Ed.2d 306 (1979); NLRB v. Morse Shoe, Inc., 591 F.2d 542, 545 (9th Cir. 1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Veitch
v.
Superior Court, County of Santa Clara, California (California, Real Party in Interest)
v.
Superior Court, County of Santa Clara, California (California, Real Party in Interest)
No. 79-119.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 5, 1979.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.