green
Positive treatment
9.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 48 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Fidelity Financial Corporation v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, Milton Feinerman, President of the Federal Home Loan Bank of S.F.
But cf. Rust v. Johnson, 597 F.2d 174, 177-78 (9th Cir.) (suggesting that Federal Home Loan Banks may be federal instrumentalities for supremacy clause purposes), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 450 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979); Fahey v. O’Melveny & Myers, 200 F.2d 420, 446, 454 (9th Cir.1952) (ruling, pre-Jackson, that Federal Home Loan Banks are “governmental banking agencies” in the context of determining that the banks do not have due process rights against the government), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 952 , 73 S.Ct. 866 , 97 L.Ed. 1374 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Nagel
Second, it is well settled that “a witness appearing before a [g]rand [j]ury must be apprised of the extent of the immunity conferred by statute before a criminal contempt conviction may be had for the witness’s refusal to testify” (Matter of Matt v Larocca, 71 NY2d 154, 161 [1987], cert denied 486 US 1007 [1988], reh denied 487 US 1250 [1988], rearg dismissed 78 NY2d 909 [1991]; see People v Rappaport, 47 NY2d 308, 313 [1979], cert denied 444 US 964 [1979]).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Venable
See United States v. Lindsey, 47 F.3d 440, 444 (D.C.Cir.1995), vacated on other grounds sub nom., Robinson v. United States, 516 U.S. 1023 , 116 S.Ct. 665 , 133 L.Ed.2d 516 (1995) (citing United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1120 (5th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louis v. State
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112 , 1115 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979) (recognizing that two indictments involving the same crime may be outstanding at the same time).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerry Wayne Louis v. State
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112 , 1115 n.1 (5th 3 Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979) (recognizing that two indictments involving the same crime may be outstanding at the same time).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerry Wayne Louis v. State
See United States v. Stricklin , 591 F.2d 1112 , 1115 n.1 (5 th Cir.), cert. denied , 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979) (recognizing that two indictments involving the same crime may be outstanding at the same time).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerry Wayne Louis v. State
See United States v. Stricklin , 591 F.2d 1112 , 1115 n.1 (5 th Cir.), cert. denied , 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979) (recognizing that two indictments involving the same crime may be outstanding at the same time).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Delores Bennett, United States of America v. Noble Laverne Bennett, Also Known as Turtle, Also Known as Little Brother, United States of America v. George Dixon, Also Known as Willie MacK Also Known as Dick, Also Known as Big Brother, United States of America v. Darryl Gillespie, Also Known as Hawk, Also Known as Hawkeye
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1122 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979). 17 In Albernaz v. United States, 450 U.S. 333 , 101 S.Ct. 1137 , 67 L.Ed.2d 275 (1981), the Supreme Court held that a single narcotics conspiracy or agreement may constitute the separate offenses of conspiracy to import marijuana, 21 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bennett
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1122 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Lefevbre
See United States v. Johnson, 594 F.2d 1253, 1257 (9th Cir.) (proponent of a chart or summary must establish foundation by showing that the underlying materials are admissible evidence, although materials need not be admitted), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 (1979); United States v. Meyers, 847 F.2d 1408, 1412 (9th Cir.1988) (same) 2 Lefevbre erroneously relies on a number of Ninth Circuit and out-of-circuit cases that discuss the use of charts as a summary of testimony already admitted into evidence or the use of charts as "testimonial aids." See, e.g., United States v. Soulard, 730 F.2d 1292, 13…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald Drasen, Anthony Aleo, and Cynthia Aleo
(2×)
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112 , 1115-16 n. 1 (5th Cir.) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979); 9 Federal Procedure Sec. 22:463 (L.Ed.1982). 3 26 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Lee Atkins
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1117-19 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Erwin
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1122 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979) (citation omitted); see also Elam, 678 F.2d at 1246 (inherent nature of the criminal scheme; interrelationship, including overlapping membership, between various parts to the scheme; common goal). 23 Here, the evidence does indicate that Don ran an operation in most respects independent from Bonnie's.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Erwin
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1122 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979) (citation omitted); see also Elam, 678 F.2d at 1246 (inherent nature of the criminal scheme; interrelationship, including overlapping membership, between various parts to the scheme; common goal).
cited
Cited "see"
Jerome Goldberg and Marjorie Goldberg v. United States
See United States v. Johnson, 594 F.2d 1253, 1255 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 451 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Boldin
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979). 1.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Boldin
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979). 42 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ben M. Hogan Co., Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Cuesta, 597 F.2d 903 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 451 , 62 L.Ed.2d 377 (1979) (investigators’ notes of interviews do not fall under the Jencks Act even if they contain occasional verbatim recitations of phrases of interviewee).
discussed
Cited "see"
Keith v. Volpe
(2×)
See United States v. Johnson, 594 F.2d 1253, 1255 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 451 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Milton A. Miller and Mandel M. Miller v. The City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation
See Rust v. Johnson, 597 F.2d 174, 177 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 450 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Rychen Paddack v. Dave Christensen, Inc.
See United States v. Johnson, 594 F.2d 1253, 1254-57 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 451 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Paddack v. Dave Christensen, Inc.
See United States v. Johnson, 594 F.2d 1253, 1254-57 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 451 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas James Sinito
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979); United States v. Marable, 578 F.2d at 154 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony T. Mulherin, Jr., Harvey E. Hornsby, Robert A. Holliday, Henry Mulherin, Elizabeth Moore
See U.S. v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Phoenix v. Com/systems, Inc., Richard H. Barry, Counter-Claimant/appellant v. City of Phoenix, Counter-Defendant/appellee. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Cross-Claimant v. Richard H. Barry, Cross-Defendant
See United States v. Johnson, 594 F.2d 1253, 1254-57 (9th Cir.) (summary admissible only if underlying documents admissible, voluminous, and available for inspection), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 451 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Phoenix v. Com/Systems, Inc.
See United States v. Johnson, 594 F.2d 1253 , 1254 — 57 (9th Cir.) (summary admissible only if underlying documents admissible, voluminous, and available for inspection), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 451 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sparkman v. Sparkman
See Rust v. Johnson, 597 F.2d 174, 177-78 (9th Cir.) (Federal National Mortgage Association remains an instrumentality even though it acts as a "Government-sponsored private corporation" in the absence of legislative history or statutory authority to support the conclusion that Congress intended to strip the Association of its federal instrumentality status), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 450 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Merced Production Credit Ass'n v. Sparkman
See Rust v. Johnson, 597 F.2d 174, 177-78 (9th Cir.) (Federal National Mortgage Association remains an instrumentality even though it acts as a “Government-sponsored private corporation” in the absence of legislative history or statutory authority to support the conclusion that Congress intended to strip the Association of its federal instrumentality status), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 450 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Allen
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1125 (5th Cir.) (“the essence of a double jeopardy determination in a conspiracy case is whether there was more than one agreement”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph L. Cole
Accord, United States v. Cuesta, 597 F.2d 903 , 914 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 451 , 62 L.Ed.2d 377 ; United States v. Hodges, 556 F.2d 366, 368 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 1016 , 98 S.Ct. 735 , 54 L.Ed.2d 762 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Franklin Eugene Nixon
(2×)
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1120 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1980) (When a prior indictment is dismissed, "the government is not barred from using the underlying facts in that offense as the basis for a charge that he committed a different offense"). 18 A speedy trial claim as to each separate offense must stand or fall on its own merits, based upon when the defendant was accused, by arrest or indictment, of that specific offense.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Boffa
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1117-18 (C.A.5), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979); United States v. Inmon, 568 F.2d 326, 329 (C.A.3,1977), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 859 , 100 S.Ct. 121 , 62 L.Ed.2d 79 (1979); United States v. Kamins, 479 F.Supp. 1374, 1375 (W.D.Pa.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carroll Leppo, United States of America v. Leppo, Carroll
See United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1117-18 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William George Dunbar, M. D.
See United States v. Strick *989 lin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1117-18 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Trolley Square Associates v. Nielson
See also United States v. Johnson, 594 F.2d 1253 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 451 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carmona
See also United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1118 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George E. Taylor, Jr. v. John P. Whitley, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
See also United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1124 (5th Cir.) (“we assign the burden of persuasion in a pretrial double jeopardy hearing to the government upon the defendant’s making a prima facie showing of prior jeopardy.’’), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Persico
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1119 (5th Cir.) (describing procedure for district court to follow in determining pre-trial double jeopardy claim), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Persico
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1119 (5th Cir.) (describing procedure for district court to follow in determining pre-trial double jeopardy claim), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angelo Amen, Mark A. Deleonardis, Michael Paradiso and Oreste Abbamonte, Jr.
See also United States v. Stricklin, 591 F.2d 1112, 1123-24 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerry Nelson
See also United States v. Cuesta, 597 F.2d 903, 918 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 451 , 62 L.Ed.2d 377 (1979) (single conspiracy found where plan to hinder government’s investigation did not take the form of one joint action, but rather multiple actions for the purpose of achieving one overall objective).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gwinn Area Community Schools v. State of Mich.
See, e.g., White Mountain Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 598 F.2d 274, 278 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. City Of Pittsburg
See also Rust v. Johnson, 597 F.2d 174, 179 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 450 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979) (local government cannot override federal interest even though local government was engaged in valid state function).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. City of Pittsburg
See also Rust v. Johnson, 597 F.2d 174, 179 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 450 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979) (local government cannot override federal interest even though local government was engaged in valid state function).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ford Motor Company, a Corporation v. Auto Supply Company, Inc. H. K. Auto Supply, Inc. And Harold H. Karp, Aaa Business Forms and Systems, Inc
See also United States v. Johnson, 594 F.2d 1253, 1255-57 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 451 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979); 5 J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Shawnee Coal Company v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior
See, e. g., White Mountain Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 598 F.2d 274, 278 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Aleknagik Natives Limited v. Andrus
See, e. g., White Mountain Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 194 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 359 , 598 F.2d 274, 278 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 963 , 100 S.Ct. 449 , 62 L.Ed.2d 375 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dudley Bell
See, e. g., United States v. Cuesta, 597 F.2d 903, 920 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 451 , 62 L.Ed.2d 377 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Laclede Gas Co.
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
No. 79-321.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 1979.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.