Gaskins v. Skarmeas, 444 U.S. 969 (1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Gaskins v. Skarmeas, 444 U.S. 969 (1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Sumler (connappct, 2022-12-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Sumler
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Saniti, 604 F.2d 603, 605 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) (court properly admitted identification testimony of witnesses who were able to identify clothing worn by individual in surveillance photographs as clothing that belonged to defendant), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 969 , 100 S. Ct. 461 , 62 L.
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Lewis
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Saniti, 604 F.2d 603, 604 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 461 , 62 L.Ed.2d 384 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Gore
Conn. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Courts consider the following four factors relevant to determin- ing whether the witness is more likely to correctly iden- tify the defendant than is the jury: (1) the witness’ general level of familiarity with the defendant’s appear- ance; see, e.g., United States v. Jackman, 48 F.3d 1 , 3–6 (1st Cir. 1995) (defendant’s former wife and two acquaintances, each of whom had known defendant for years, had sufficient relevant familiarity with defendant to allow testimony identifying defendant in surveillance footage); (2) the witness’ familiarity with the defen- dant’s appearance, incl…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Gore
Conn. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Courts consider the following four factors relevant to determin- ing whether the witness is more likely to correctly iden- tify the defendant than is the jury: (1) the witness’ general level of familiarity with the defendant’s appear- ance; see, e.g., United States v. Jackman, 48 F.3d 1 , 3–6 (1st Cir. 1995) (defendant’s former wife and two acquaintances, each of whom had known defendant for years, had sufficient relevant familiarity with defendant to allow testimony identifying defendant in surveillance footage); (2) the witness’ familiarity with the defen- dant’s appearance, incl…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Gore
Conn. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Courts consider the following four factors relevant to determin- ing whether the witness is more likely to correctly iden- tify the defendant than is the jury: (1) the witness’ general level of familiarity with the defendant’s appear- ance; see, e.g., United States v. Jackman, 48 F.3d 1 , 3–6 (1st Cir. 1995) (defendant’s former wife and two acquaintances, each of whom had known defendant for years, had sufficient relevant familiarity with defendant to allow testimony identifying defendant in surveillance footage); (2) the witness’ familiarity with the defen- dant’s appearance, incl…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vance v. Rice
S.D. Iowa · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Saniti, 604 F.2d 603, 604 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. den. 444 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 461 , 62 L.Ed.2d 384 (1979); United States v. Mathis, 559 F.2d 294, 298-99 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Apodaca, 522 F.2d 568, 571 (10th Cir. 1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gaskins
v.
Skarmeas
No. 79-5303.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 1979.
444 U.S. 969
Published

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.