Gentry Crowell, Sec'y of State of Tennessee v. Richard Mader, 444 U.S. 505 (1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Gentry Crowell, Sec'y of State of Tennessee v. Richard Mader, 444 U.S. 505 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
144 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Miller v. Glanz (ca10, 2009-06-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" Miller v. Glanz (3×)
10th Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crowell v. Mader, 444 U.S. 505, 506 , 100 S.Ct. 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 701 (1980); compare Longley v. Holahan, 34 F.3d 1366, 1367 (8th Cir.1994) (following Munsingwear procedure when entire case was mooted during appeal of preliminary injunction) with Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Shalala, 53 F.3d 363, 366 (D.C.Cir.1995) (ordering only vacatur of appealed preliminary injunction where mooting event did not affect rest of case).
examined Cited "see" Quinn v. The State Of Missouri (3×)
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crowell v. Mader, 444 U.S. 505, 506 , 100 S.Ct. 992, 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 701 (1980) (per curiam); Williams v. Alioto, 625 F.2d 845, 848 (9th Cir.1980) (per curiam), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 1723 , 68 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
examined Cited "see" Quinn v. Missouri (3×)
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crowell v. Mader, 444 U.S. 505, 506 , 100 S.Ct. 992, 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 701 (1980) (per curiam); Williams v. Alioto, 625 F.2d 845, 848 (9th Cir.1980) (per curiam), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 1723 , 68 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" Andrew Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Connelly v. Uniroyal, Inc., 75 Ill.2d 393 , 27 Ill.Dec. 343 , 389 N.E.2d 155 (1979), cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1060 , 100 S.Ct. 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 738 (1980); City of Hartford v. Associated Construction Co., 34 Conn.Supp. 204 , 384 A.2d 390 (Super.Ct.1978); Kasel v. Remington Arms Co., 24 Cal.App.3d 711 , 101 Cal.Rptr. 314 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Connelly v. Uniroyal, Inc., 75 Ill.2d 393 , 27 Ill.Dec. 343 , 389 N.E.2d 155 (1979), cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1060 , 100 S.Ct. 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 738 (1980); City of Hartford v. Associated Construction Co., 34 Conn. Supp. 204 , 384 A.2d 390 (Super.Ct.1978); Kasel v. Remington Arms Co., 24 Cal.App.3d 711 , 101 Cal.Rptr. 314 (1972).
examined Cited "see" NAACP, Detroit Branch v. Detroit Police Officers Ass'n (3×)
E.D. Mich. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crowell v. Mader, 444 U.S. 505 , 100 S.Ct. 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 701 (1980); Williams v. Alioto, 625 F.2d 845 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1012 , 101 S.Ct. 1723 , 68 L.Ed.2d 213 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Connelly v. Uniroyal, Inc., 75 Ill.2d 393 , 27 Ill.Dec. 343 , 389 N.E.2d 155 (1979), cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1060 , 100 S.Ct. 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 738 (1980); City of Hartford v. Associated Construction Co., 34 Conn. Supp. 204 , 384 A.2d 390 (Super.Ct.1978); Kasel v. Remington Arms Co., 24 Cal.App. 3d 711 , 101 Cal.Rptr. 314 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" Andrew Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Connelly v. Uniroyal, Inc., 75 Ill.2d 393 , 27 Ill.Dec. 343 , 389 N.E.2d 155 (1979), cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1060 , 100 S.Ct. 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 738 (1980); City of Hartford v. Associated Construction Co., 34 Conn.Supp. 204 , 384 A.2d 390 (Super.Ct.1978); Kasel v. Remington Arms Co., 24 Cal.App.3d 711 , 101 Cal.Rptr. 314 (1972).
examined Cited "see" Constangy, Brooks & Smith, by Larry W. Bridgesmith on Behalf of Teledyne Industries, Inc., D/B/A Teledyne Still-Man v. National Labor Relations Board (3×)
6th Cir. · 1988 · signal: accord · confidence high
Co. v. NLRB, 741 F.2d 882, 884-86 (6th Cir.1984) (mootness of appeal does not affect party’s ability to seek attorney’s fees); accord Crowell v. Mader, 444 U.S. 505, 506 , 100 S.Ct. 992, 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 701 (1980) (per curiam).
examined Cited "see" International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Interstate Commerce Commission (3×)
D.C. Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crowell v. Mader, 444 U.S. 505 , 100 S.Ct. 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 701 (1980) (vacatur inappropriate when only part of controversy mooted); cf. Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U.S. 528 , 46 S.Ct. 600 , 70 L.Ed. 1071 (1926) (vacatur appropriate where only incidental issues of relief remain, and record insufficient to permit their resolution).
examined Cited "see" International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Norfolk Southern Corporation and North American Van Lines, Inc., Intervenors. Patrick W. Simmons v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Norfolk Southern Corporation and North American Van Lines, Inc., Intervenors (3×)
D.C. Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crowell v. Mader, 444 U.S. 505 , 100 S.Ct. 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 701 (1980) (vacatur inappropriate when only part of controversy mooted); cf. Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U.S. 528 , 46 S.Ct. 600 , 70 L.Ed. 1071 (1926) (vacatur appropriate where only incidental issues of relief remain, and record insufficient to permit their resolution).
cited Cited "see" Allen v. Ellisor
SCOTUS · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crowell v. Mader, 444 U. S. 505 (1980).
examined Cited "see" Carlos Romero-Barcelo, Etc. v. Harold Brown (3×)
1st Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crowell v. Mader, 444 U.S. 505, 506 , 100 S.Ct. 992 , 992, 62 L.Ed.2d 701 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Joseph B. Williams and Leo Bazile v. Joseph L. Alioto (2×)
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Crowell v. Mader, - U.S. -, -, 100 S.Ct. 992, 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 701, 703 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Woodruff v. Caris MPI (2×)
5th Cir. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
In addition, “[w]hen an appeal from an interlocutory order concerning injunctive relief becomes moot, appellate courts routinely decline to address the other issues remaining before the district court.” Marilyn T., Inc., 803 F.2d at 1385 n.5 (collecting cases); see also id. (citing Crowell v. Mader, 444 U.S. 505, 506 , 100 S. Ct. 992 (1980)(per curiam).
examined Cited "see, e.g." William E. Brock v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers Of America (6×)
6th Cir. · 1990 · signal: compare · confidence low
Workers v. Dana Corp., 697 F.2d 718, 721 (6th Cir.1983) (en banc); compare Crowell v. Mader, 444 U.S. 505 , 100 S.Ct. 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 701 (1980); Constagny, Brooks & Smith ex rel.
examined Cited "see, e.g." Brock v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers (6×)
6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: compare · confidence low
Workers v. Dana Corp., 697 F.2d 718, 721 (6th Cir.1983) (en banc); compare Crowell v. Mader, 444 U.S. 505 , 100 S.Ct. 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 701 (1980); Constagny, Brooks & Smith ex rel.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State Ex Rel. Newport v. Wiesman
Mo. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Connelly v. Uniroyal, Inc., 75 Ill.2d 393 , 27 Ill.Dec. 343 , 389 N.E.2d 155, 158-60 (1979), cert. denied, appeal dismissed, Uniroyal Englebert Belgique, S.A. v. Connelly, 444 U.S. 1060 , 100 S.Ct. 992 , 62 L.Ed.2d 738 (1980); Marquette National Bank v. Norris, 270 N.W.2d 290, 294-95 (Minn.1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CROWELL, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TENNESSEE, Et Al.
v.
MADER Et Al.
78-1780.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1980.
444 U.S. 505
Per Curiam.
Cited by 32 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The petition for rehearing is granted.

In Kopald v. Carr, 343 F. Supp. 51 (MD Tenn. 1972), the District Court applied this Court’s earlier holding in Baker v. Carr, 369 U. S. 186 (1962), to invalidate two senatorial dis-tricting plans. That decision resulted in the formulation of a so-called court ordered “Kopald Plan.” That plan was superseded by a 1973 legislative plan.

In this litigation the District Court invalidated the 1973 legislative plan. It enjoined the defendants from conducting any elections pursuant to that plan and retained jurisdiction to review whatever substitute the Tennessee General Assembly might enact prior to June 1, 1979, or, if necessary, to reinstate the 1972 “Kopald Plan.” The court further ordered a hearing to award fees to plaintiffs’ counsel.

In response to the State’s appeal to this Court, appellees pointed out that the legislature had enacted a new plan effective on June 6, 1979, argued that the controversy over the[*506] validity of the 1973 legislative plan had therefore become moot; and requested that the appeal therefore be dismissed. This Court, following a practice that is appropriate when an entire case has become moot but which is inappropriate when only the issues raised on appeal have been resolved, entered an order directing that the judgment of the District Court be vacated and that the entire action be dismissed as moot. Post, p. 806.

The recent legislation did not moot the entire case, but only the issues raised on appeal. Appellees may still wish to attack the newly enacted legislation or apply for attorney’s fees. We therefore vacate our prior order. In lieu thereof, we direct that the judgment of the District Court be vacated without prejudice to such further proceedings in the District Court as may be appropriate. See Diffenderfer v. Central Baptist Church, 404 U. S. 412 (1972).

It is so ordered.