green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.3 score
“it is well established that the admission of statements obtained in violation of miranda may be said to constitute harmless error”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gerald Lynn Harrison v. Norman J. Owen
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
it is well established that the admission of statements obtained in violation of miranda may be said to constitute harmless error
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dahlquist
See Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870, 875 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Ray Harrell
See Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870, 875 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Stanley Bentley
See Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 23-24 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 827-28 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). 23 Harmless error "is an exacting standard that must be uncompromisingly applied." Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870, 876 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oliver Jones v. Richard L. Dugger
(2×)
See Cape, 741 F.2d at 1295 (citing Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870 (5th Cir.) (admission of statements obtained in violation of Miranda may be harmless error), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980)). 59 Were it to do so, it could not conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the error in this case had no effect on the outcome of Jones's trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sammie Felder, Jr. v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of Corrections
See abo Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870, 876 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980). 25 . 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). 26 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Garnett William Cape v. Robert Francis, Warden
(2×)
See Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870, 875 (5th Cir.) (en banc ), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eutues White v. Fred Finkbeiner
(2×)
See Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870 , 872 n.3 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980) (extension argument made for first time on appeal); Wilson v. Henderson, 584 F.2d 1185, 1189 (2d Cir. 1978) (dicta), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 945 , 99 S.Ct. 2892 , 61 L.Ed.2d 316 (1979) (“The holding in Stone was expressly grounded upon Fourth Amendment search and seizure issues and the exclusionary rule.”); Smith v. Wainwright, 581 F.2d 1149, 1151 (5th Cir. 1978) (dicta); Cannistraci v. Smith, 470 F.Supp. 586, 590 (S.D.N.Y.1979) (dicta) (Stone rationale onl…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Heck v. Humphrey, the Supreme Court held that a
See Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870 , 875 n. 12 (5th Cir.) (noting that prosecutorial use of involuntary statements can never be treated as harmless error), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Alvin Smith, Cross-Appellee v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
In Christopher , we noted that we have also ruled the unlawful admission of a confession to be harmless when there was direct physical evidence of guilt. 824 F.2d at 846 n. 24; see, e.g., Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870, 876-78 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (unlawfully admitted confession that condom found on defendant's person contained heroin harmless in light of laboratory tests identifying substance), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Alvin Smith, Cross-Appellee v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-Appellant
In Christopher , we noted that we have also ruled the unlawful admission of a confession to be harmless when there was direct physical evidence of guilt. 824 F.2d at 846 n. 24; see, e.g., Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870, 876-78 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (unlawfully admitted confession that condom found on defendant’s person contained heroin harmless in light of laboratory tests identifying substance), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Charles
See e.g., Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980); State v. Jones, 386 So.2d 1363 (La.1980). [1] The record in this case reflects no indication that defendant's statement was involuntary.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Keith Bryan Webb
See, e.g., Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d *393 870, 875-78 (5th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Remai
Compare United States v. Alba, 15 M.J. 573 (A.C.M.R. 1983), with Harryman v. Estelle, 616 F.2d 870 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 860 , 101 S.Ct. 161 , 66 L.Ed.2d 76 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Garrett
v.
Hutto, Corrections Director
v.
Hutto, Corrections Director
No. 79-6744.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)
Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.