green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Buttrum v. Black
See Coleman, 778 F.2d at 1490 , quoting Mayola v. Alabama, 623 F.2d 992, 997 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Preston Brown v. Ross Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, and William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of Louisiana
See Mayola v. State of Alabama, 623 F.2d 992, 999 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Seymour X Cotton, Jr. v. James Mabry, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
(2×)
See Mayola v. Alabama, 623 F.2d 992, 1000 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Timothy George Baldwin v. Frank C. Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, and William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of Louisiana
See Mayola v. State of Alabama, 623 F.2d 992, 996-98 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981) (appellant seeking nullification of conviction must demonstrate an “actual, identifiable prejudice attributable to that publicity on the part of members of his jury”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chandler v. Crosby
See also Mayola v. Alabama, 623 F.2d 992, 997 (5th Cir.1980) (“[Wjhere a petitioner adduces evidence of inflammatory, prejudicial pretrial publicity that so pervades or saturates the community as to render virtually impossible a fair trial by an impartial jury drawn from that community, ‘(jury) prejudice is presumed and there is no further duty to establish bias’”) (quoting United States v. Capo, 595 F.2d 1086, 1090 (5th Cir.1979)) (additional citations omitted), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard Wayne Snell v. A.L. Lockhart, Richard Wayne Snell v. A.L. Lockhart
Coleman, 778 F.2d at 1490 ; see also Mayola v. Alabama, 623 F.2d 992, 997 (5th Cir.1980) (“[Ojnly in Rideau , itself, has the Supreme Court reversed a state court conviction on this basis of presumed prejudice deriving solely from pretrial publicity.”), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Alton Harris v. R. Pulley, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, California
See, e.g., Mayola v. Alabama, 623 F.2d 992, 999 (5th Cir. Unit A 1980) (prejudice found where there was “impairment of the recollections of numerous witnesses”), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981); Bouchillon v. Estelle, 628 F.2d 926, 929 (5th Cir. Unit A 1980) (prejudice found where “at least two of the witnesses no longer had an independent recollection of the facts of the trial”); Brown, 730 F.2d at 295 (prejudice found where judge and defense attorney did not remember petitioner’s plea); Arnold v. Marshall, 657 F.2d 83, 84 (6th Cir.1981) (per curi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Alton Harris v. R. Pulley, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, California
See, e.g., Mayola v. Alabama, 623 F.2d 992, 999 (5th Cir. Unit A 1980) (prejudice found where there was “impairment of the recollections of numerous witnesses”), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981); Bouchillon v. Estelle, 628 F.2d 926, 929 (5th Cir. Unit A 1980) (prejudice found where “at least two of the witnesses no longer had an independent recollection of the facts of the trial”); Brown, 730 F.2d at 295 (prejudice found where judge and defense attorney did not remember petitioner’s plea); Arnold v. Marshall, 657 F.2d 83, 84 (6th Cir.1981) (per curi…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen Lee Davis v. Richard L. Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth
(4×)
See, e.g., Mayola v. Alabama, 623 F.2d 992, 1000 (5th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981); Paprskar v. Estelle, 612 F.2d 1003, 1008 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 885 , 101 S.Ct. 239 , 66 L.Ed.2d 111 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hargrave v. Landon
The sole exception to this conventional approach of showing actual prejudice was addressed by the *306 Supreme Court in Rideau v. Louisiana, 373 U.S. 723 , 83 S.Ct. 1417 , 10 L.Ed.2d 663 (1963); see also Mayola v. State of Alabama, 623 R2d 992, 996 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John A. Tegzes, Susan Langston
Cf. Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. at 722-23 , 81 S.Ct. at 1642-43 (jurors need not be totally ignorant of the facts and issues in a case, nor be free of impressions or opinions on the merits of the case); see also Mayola v. Alabama, 623 F.2d 992, 999 (5th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis Aaron Bowen v. A.L. Murphy and the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Davis v. Adult Parole Authority, 610 F.2d 410, 414 (6th Cir.1979); see also Mayola v. Alabama, 623 F.2d 992 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reed
v.
Jago, Correctional Superintendent
v.
Jago, Correctional Superintendent
No. 80-5996.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1981.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.