green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Dries v. Sprinklr Inc
See Sangster v. United Air Lines, Inc., 633 F.2d 864, 868 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 (1981); see also Goldstine v. FedEx Freight Inc., 2020 WL 5500369 , at *1 (W.D.
cited
Cited "see"
McNair v. McNair
See D'Arc v. D'Arc, 175 N.J.Super. 598, 601 , 421 A. 2d 602 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 85 N.J. 487 , 427 A. 2d 579 (1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed. 2d 350 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Prudencio v. Runyon
Retroactive seniority only may be denied if the opposing party demonstrates that such relief would cause an “unusual adverse impact” that would not “generally be found in Title VII cases.” Franks, 424 U.S. at 779 , 96 S.Ct. 1251 ; accord, Sangster v. United Air Lines, Inc., 438 F.Supp. 1221 (N.D.Cal.1977), aff'd 633 F.2d 864 (9th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2048 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mazyck v. Long Island R. Co.(LIRR)
See Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A., 634 F.2d 30, 40 (2d Cir.1980) (holding that inflation should be considered in estimating the present value of lost future wages, and suggesting 2% as an appropriate discount rate), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981); see also DeChico v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 758 F.2d 856, 860-61 (2d Cir.1985) (applying Doca to require discount rate to be adjusted for future inflation in connection with award for future pain and suffering).
cited
Cited "see"
Kay Austen v. State of Hawaii University of Hawaii, Kay Austen v. State of Hawaii University of Hawaii Travis Summergill Richard Seymour
See Sangster v. United Air Lines, Inc., 633 F.2d 864, 867 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stanley v. Bertram-Trojan, Inc.
Wedlock v. Gulf Mississippi Marine Corp., 554 F.2d 240, 243 (5th Cir.1977); see Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A., 634 F.2d 30, 34 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied sub nom., Pittston Stevedoring Corp. v. Doca, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Massie v. Indiana Gas Co.
See Sangster v. United Air Lines, Inc., 633 F.2d 864, 868 (9th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2048 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Danny Sellers and Terry Roach
See United States v. Entrekin, 624 F.2d 597, 598-99 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981) (shoplifting); 6 United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626 , 638 n. 15 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2162 , 64 L.Ed.2d 794 (1980) (bank robbery); see also Howard v. Gonzales, 658 F.2d 352, 358-59 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981) (theft). 7 But see United States v. Brown, 603 F.2d 1022, 1029 (1st Cir.1979) (holding that burglary and petit larceny have bearing on credibility).
cited
Cited "see"
E. Scott McHenry v. Samuel Chadwick
See United States v. Entrekin, 624 F.2d 597, 598 (5th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Karen L. Edwards v. Occidental Chemical Corporation
See Sangster v. United Airlines, Inc., 633 F.2d 864 , 867 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2048 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Oliveri v. Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. And Crowley Maritime Corp., and Third-Party v. Midland-Ross Corporation, Third-Party
See Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A., 634 F.2d 30 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981); see also Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Pfeifer, supra, 462 U.S. at 533-52 , 103 S.Ct. at 2548-58 ; McCrann v. United States Lines, Inc., 803 F.2d 771 (2d Cir.1986); Van Nijenhoff v. Bantry Transportation Co., 791 F.2d 26, 27 (2d Cir.1986); Crane v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 731 F.2d 1042, 1051-52 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 179 , 83 L.Ed.2d 114 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wisconsin Avenue Nursing Home v. District of Columbia Commission on Human Rights
See Sangster v. United Air Lines, Inc., 633 F.2d 864 , 866 & n. 2, 868 (9th Cir.1980) (flight attendant’s minimal efforts to seek employment over a period of eight years not reasonably diligent), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2048 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Cunningham v. Quaker Oats Co.
See, Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A., 634 F.2d 30 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981) (suggesting a 2 percent discount rate).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson, Charles Voyed Harrelson and Elizabeth Nichols Chagra
The marital privilege protects “information privately disclosed between husband and wife in the confidence of the marital relationship.” Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 51 , 100 S.Ct. 906, 913 , 63 L.Ed.2d 186 (1980). “[Conversations between husband and wife about crimes in which they are jointly participating when the conversations occur are not marital communications for the purpose of the marital privilege, and thus do not fall within the privilege’s protection of confidential marital communications.” United States v. Mendoza, 574 F.2d 1373, 1381 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 4…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Judy Ann Archer and Jerry Vaughn Archer
See United States v. Entrekin, 624 F.2d 597 (5th Cir.1980) (Mendoza unaffected by Trammel), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shu-Tao Lin v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
See Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, SA., 634 F.2d 30, 34-40 (2d Cir.1980) (suggesting 2% as a minimum inflation-adjusted discount rate), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981); Shatkin v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation and American Airlines, Inc., 565 F.Supp. 93 at 96 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (questioning whether expert estimate of 0.11% real rate of interest was made in good faith).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Rostad
See People v. Duemig, 620 P.2d 240 (1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2048 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Red Star Towing & Transportation Co. v. Ming Giant
See Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A., 634 F.2d 30 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael A. Picciandra, United States of America v. A. Russell Lucid, Jr.
See Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 51 , 100 S.Ct. 906, 912 , 63 L.Ed.2d 186 (1980); see, e.g., United States v. Entrekin, 624 F.2d 597, 598 (5th Cir.1980) (per curiam), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Deadmond
See also People v. Duemig, 620 P.2d 240 (Colo.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2048 , 68 L.Ed.2d 350 (1981); People v. Myers, 198 Colo. 295 , 599 P.2d 891 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LeFebre v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See also Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S.A., 634 F.2d 30 (2nd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981); Pfeifer v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 678 F.2d 453 (3rd Cir.1982) (overruling Magill v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 464 F.2d 294 (3rd Cir.1972)); Culver v. Slater Boat Co., 688 F.2d 280 (5th Cir.1982) (en banc) (overruling Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Co., 469 F.2d 897 (5th Cir.1972)); Bach v. Penn Central Transportation Co., 502 F.2d 1117, 1122 (6th Cir.1974); O’Shea v. Riverway Towing Co., 677 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir.1982); Riha v. Jasper Blackb…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ruth Culver, Cross-Appellees v. Slater Boat Co., Cross Europirates International, Inc., and Cross- Appellees-Appellants v. Odeco Drilling, Cross
(2×)
Such an approach would mirror that of Feldman v. Allegheny Airlines, 524 F.2d 384 (2d Cir. 1975) (1.5% real return); see also Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, 634 F.2d 30 (2d Cir. 1979) (suggesting using 2% real rate of return), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 971 , 101 S.Ct. 2049 , 68 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981). 21 A second variant, the Alaska Rule disparaged by the majority, would treat the inflation and discount rates as offsetting each other totally and therefore cancelling each other out.
LoBue
v.
Nevada ex rel. Department of Highways
v.
Nevada ex rel. Department of Highways
No. 80-1516.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 4, 1981.
Published
Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.