green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Spraque v. Thorn Americas, Inc.
See, Nulf, 656 F.2d at 560 (citing Lemons v. City and County of Denver, 620 F.2d 228, 229-30 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doyon, Ltd. v. United States
To manage these assets for Alaskan Natives, the settlement established 13 regional Alaska Native Corporations (ANCs). 43 U.S.C. § 1611 ; see Klukwan, Inc., v. Commissioner, 68 T.C.M. 446, 447 , 1994 WL 444446 (Aug. 18, 1994); see United States v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 435 F.Supp. 1009, 1018 (D.Alaska) (discussing in further detail ANCSA), aff'd, 612 F.2d 1132 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Diversified Numismatics, Inc. v. City of Orlando
See In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litig., 614 F.2d 958, 960-61 (5th Cir.) ("Disqualification questions are fully reviewable on appeal from final judgment.” (citations omitted)), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Norton
See Steering Comm. v. Mead Corp. (In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litig.), 614 F.2d 958 , 963 n. 9 (5th Cir.1980) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980)' and United States v. Torkington, 874 F.2d 1441, 1446 (11th Cir. 1989) (where the court stated “the district judge has the initial responsibility to recuse himself from a case.”) There are many reported cases, too numerous to cite, where an appellate court does not comment on the issue of who should hear the disqualification motion, but seems to approve of the challenged judge having heard the motion.
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Irwin Gwin v. Wayne Snow, Jr., Robert I. Gwin v. Mobley Howell
See In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 614 F.2d 958 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980) (plaintiff must demonstrate that the judge has a personal bias or prejudice either disfavoring the plaintiff or favoring the defendant).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Connors Steel Company
See In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 614 F.2d 958, 968 (5th Cir.) (for purpose of determining whether a judge should disqualify himself, views of the judge's law clerk cannot be attributed to the judge), cert. denied sub nom., 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980); cf. Hunt v. American Bank & Trust Co., 783 F.2d 1011 , 1015-16 (11th Cir.1986) ("A judge is not necessarily forbidden, however, to do all that is prohibited to each of his clerks.").
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Connors Steel Co.
See In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 614 F.2d 958, 968 (5th Cir.) (for purpose of determining whether a judge should disqualify himself, views of the judge’s law clerk cannot be attributed to the judge), cert. denied sub nom., 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980); cf. Hunt v. American Bank & Trust Co., 783 F.2d 1011 , 1015-16 (11th Cir.1986) (“A judge is not necessarily forbidden, however, to do all that is prohibited to each of his clerks.”).
cited
Cited "see"
American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees v. Washington
See Lemons v. Denver, 620 F.2d 228 , 229 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980); Christensen, 563 F.2d at 356 .
discussed
Cited "see"
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio (Afscme) v. State of Washington, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio (Afscme) v. State of Washington
See Lemons v. Denver, 620 F.2d 228 , 229 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980); Christensen, 563 F.2d at 356 . 19 While the Washington legislature may have the discretion to enact a comparable worth plan if it chooses to do so, Title VII does not obligate it to eliminate an economic inequality that it did not create.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry Francis Kelley
See In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 614 F.2d 958, 965 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980); United States v. Carignan, 600 F.2d 762, 764 (9th Cir.1979); Davis, supra, 517 F.2d at 1052 ; United States v. Conforte, supra, 457 F.Supp. at 657 .
cited
Cited "see"
Cape Fox Corporation v. United States of America
See generally United States v. Atlantic Rich-field Co., 612 F.2d 1132 , 1134 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, -S.Ct.-, 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
SIEBER & CALICUTT v. Sphere Drake Ins. Co.
United States v. Holland, 655 F.2d 44, 47 (5th Cir.1981); see also In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 614 F.2d 958 , 965 and n. 16 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Noel v. Medtronic Electromedics, Inc.
Tidwell v. Fort Howard Corp., 989 F.2d 406, 409 (10th Cir.1993); see also Lemons v. City and County of Denver, 620 F.2d 228, 230 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bishop v. Albertson's, Inc.
See, e.g., In re Corrugated *902 Container Antitrust Lit., 614 F.2d 958, 967-68 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980); Miller Indus. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 516 F.Supp. 84, 88-89 (S.D.Ala.1980) and authorities cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lee v. United States
No. 746, 92nd Cong. 1st Sess. 1, 34 (1971), U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1971, p. 2192 (emphasis original); see also United States v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 612 F.2d 1132, 1134 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bernard J. Coven and James F. O'COnnOr
See also, In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 614 F.2d 958 , 964-65 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. *169 888, 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980); United States v. Schreiber, 599 F.2d 534, 535-37 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979); United States v. Cowden, 545 F.2d 257, 265-66 (1st Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 909 , 97 S.Ct. 1181 , 51 L.Ed.2d 585 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Heldt
See also In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 614 F.2d 958 , 903 n.9 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henning Heldt and Duke Snider, United States of America v. Mary Sue Hubbard, United States of America v. Sharon Thomas, United States of America v. Gregory Willardson, United States of America v. Richard Weigand, United States of America v. Cindy Raymond, United States of America v. Gerald Bennett Wolfe, United States of America v. Mitchell Hermann
See also In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 614 F.2d 958 , 903 n.9 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 888 , 101 S.Ct. 244 , 66 L.Ed.2d 114 (1980) 70 Allegations regarding actual extrajudicial conduct or involvements, for example, may typically present a more compelling case for a hearing than a motion premised on rulings or comment made during actual courtroom proceedings which are urged as evidence of bias or prejudice stemming from an extrajudicial source 71 United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 , 132-34 & n.297 (D.C.Cir.1976) (en banc ), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 933 , 97 S.Ct. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fingar
v.
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.
v.
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.
No. 79-1750.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.