green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
12.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
American Cyanamid Co. v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
the greater the number of identical or more or less similar trade-marks (sic) already in use on different kinds of goods, the less is the likelihood of confusion
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
The Toro Company, a Delaware Corporation v. R & R Products Co., an Arizona Corporation
the fact that only three instances of actual confusion were found after nearly 15 years of extensive concurrent sales ... raises a presumption against the likelihood of confusion
discussed
Cited "see"
ADT, LLC v. Capital Connect, Inc.
See Amsta r Corporation v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 263 (5th Cir.) (holding that actual confusion evidence is the “best evidence of likelihood of confusion”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980). b.
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Kronberg
(United States v Barber, 668 F2d 778, 782 [4th Cir], cert denied 459 US 829 ; see, United States v Provenzano, 620 F2d 985, 1006 [3d Cir], cert denied 449 US 899 .) As this record shows, the New York Grand Jury presentation had been completed well in advance of the date Kronberg gave her immunized testimony, by which time the New York prosecutors were in possession of information establishing Kronberg’s involvement in every aspect of the fraudulent scheme proved at trial.
cited
Cited "see"
Foxworthy v. Custom Tees, Inc.
See Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 263 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 *1215 S.Ct. 268, 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Basketball Association v. Williams
See North American Soccer League v. NLRB, 613 F.2d 1379 (5th Cir.) (requiring teams in a soccer league to bargain as a "joint employer"), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 128 (1980). 42 We thus agree with the decision in Powell, 930 F.2d 1293 , in which the Eighth Circuit held that the nonstatutory labor exemption precluded an antitrust challenge to various terms and conditions of employment implemented after impasse by National Football League teams.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Basketball Ass'n v. Williams
See North American Soccer League v. NLRB, 613 F.2d 1379 (5th Cir.) (requiring teams in a soccer league to bargain as a “joint employer”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 128 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Orlando Jacobs
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985 , 1003 n. 23 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); Wilson v. Groaning, 25 F.2d 581, 586 (7th Cir.1994). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jacobs
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985 , 1003 n.23 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 (1980); Wilson v. Groaning, 25 F.2d 581, 586 (7th Cir. 1994), V.
discussed
Cited "see"
Step Co. v. Consumer Direct, Inc.
See Amstar Corp. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 263-64 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 *967 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); Exxon Corp. v. Texas Motor Exchange, Inc., 628 F.2d 500, 506 (5th Cir.1980). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sterling Drug, Incorporated v. Bayer Ag
See Kiki Undies Corp. v. Promenade Hosiery Mills, Inc., 411 F.2d 1097, 1100 (2d Cir.1969), cert. dismissed, 396 U.S. 1054 , 90 S.Ct. 707 , 24 L.Ed.2d 698 (1970). 4 Citing Amstar Corp. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 264 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980), Bayer AG argues that Sterling's survey represented a mere "word association" test, and was therefore not probative.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scarfo
See United States v. Lebovitz, 669 F.2d 894, 901 (3d Cir.) (when trial court fails to articulate balancing test, in some instances we find that court implicitly made the requisite balancing) (citing United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 1003 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980)), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 929 , 102 S.Ct. 1979 , 72 L.Ed.2d 446 (1982); United States v. Long, 574 F.2d 761, 766 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 577 , 58 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978) (the dynamics of a trial do not always permit a detailed Rule 403 analysis).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. True
See United States v. Redding, supra. Cf. United States v. Browers, supra. Its effect in the present case can be more readily equated with other remedies such as dismissal (see United States v. Gonzales, 617 F.2d 1358 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980)) or exclusion of the Government’s expert evidence (see United States v. Presser, supra) which were otherwise available and subject to appeal.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Benton Elliott
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 993 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); United States v. Billups, 522 F.Supp. 935, 955 (E.D.Va.1981) (court can admit 404(b) evidence for one purpose or many, and its admissability can be upheld if it was proper for any purpose), aff'd., 692 F.2d 320 (4th Cir.1982). 4.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James L. Williams
Accord United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985 , 993 & n. 10 (3d Cir.) (adopting reasoning of Ro-senstein), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.
See Amstar Corporation v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 259 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Suave Shoe Corporation, 533 F.Supp. 75 , 77-78 n. 4 (S.D.Fla.1981), aff' d, 716 F.2d 854 (11th Cir.1983). 40.
cited
Cited "see"
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Pizza Caesar, Inc.
See Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 263 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Hibernia Bank
(2×)
See Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 259-80 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Polo Fashions, Inc. v. Telesforo Fernandez & Hno., Inc.
See Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 263 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc.
See Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 259 (5th Cir.) (72 third party uses led to weak protection), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); Sun Banks of Florida, Inc., 651 F.2d at 316 (4400 uses in Florida alone led to weak protection).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ambrit, Inc., F/k/a the Isaly Company, Inc., Cross v. Kraft, Inc., Cross-Appellee
See Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 259 (5th Cir.) (72 third party uses led to weak protection), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); Sun Banks of Florida, Inc., 651 F.2d at 316 (4400 uses in Florida alone led to weak protection).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Neal Allen
(2×)
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980). 95 Under these unique circumstances the district court did not clearly abuse its discretion in allowing into evidence the defendant's prior conviction. 96 C.
cited
Cited "see"
ca3 1986
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 995 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. De Peri
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 995 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Freedom Savings and Loan Association, Counterclaim/defendant v. Vernon Way, Jr., D/B/A Freedom Realty, Counterclaim/plaintiff
See Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Comidas Exquisitos, Inc. v. Carlos McGee's Mexican Cafe, Inc.
See Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 263 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); beef & brew, inc. v. BEEF & BREW, INC., 389 F.Supp. 179, 186 (D.Or.1974); McCarthy § 23:35.
cited
Cited "see"
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KECO INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee
See Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Keco Industries, Inc., 617 F.2d 443 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 128 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Falcon Rice Mill, Inc. v. Community Rice Mill, Inc. And James Vidrine
Although Falcon asserts four causes of action, the underlying issue is the same in each: are Community’s packages so similar to Falcon’s that they create a likelihood of confusion as to the source of the products? 6 “[T]he basic test under every type of ‘unfair competition’ is the ‘likelihood of confusion’ test.” Chevron Chemical Co. v. Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc., 5 Cir. 1981, 659 F.2d 695, 703 , cert. denied, 1982, 457 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 2947 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1342 ; accord, Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 5 Cir., 615 F.2d 252, 265 , cert. *344 denied, 1980, 449 U…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kent Borden Rogers, United States of America v. Jacob N. Peilte
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 1005 (3d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); United States v. Romano, 583 F.2d 1, 7 (1st Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jon E. Yount v. Ernest S. Patton, Superintendent, Sci--Camp Hill, and Harvey Bartle Iii, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
(2×)
At the same time, a juror's assurance that he can enter the jury box without an opinion is not dispositive if the accused can demonstrate "the actual existence of such an opinion in the mind of the juror as will raise the presumption of partiality." Murphy, 421 U.S. at 800 , 95 S.Ct. at 2036 (quoting Irvin, 366 U.S. at 723 , 81 S.Ct. at 1643 ); see United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 995 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980). 82 The petitioner challenging his state court conviction in a habeas corpus proceeding must shoulder a particularly heavy b…
discussed
Cited "see"
Abbott v. State
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 1005 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); United States v. Romano, 583 F.2d 1, 7 (1st Cir.1978); and United States v. Jones, 542 F.2d 186, 199 (4th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2629 , 49 L.Ed.2d 375 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Co., Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Plaintiff v. Suave Shoe Corporation, a Florida Corporation
See Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 264 (5th Cir.1980) (“The appropriate universe should include a fair sampling of those purchasers most likely to partake of the alleged infringer’s goods or services.”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); cf. American Basketball Association v. AMF Voit, Inc., 358 F.Supp. 981, 986 (S.D.N.Y.) (discounting survey which allegedly demonstrated that red, white and blue basketballs had acquired secondary meaning, in part because plaintiff’s survey universe, males between 12 and 23 years old who had playe…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 997 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1981) (noting "longstanding rule that counsel's intentional tactical decisions at trial bind his client."). 39 Moreover, there is not the slightest indication in this record that the interview with Juror No. 9 in any way influenced the verdict.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aimone
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 997 (3d Cir.1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1981) (noting “longstanding rule that counsel’s intentional tactical decisions at trial bind his client.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
ChiChi's Inc. v. Chi-Mex, Inc.
See Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); Scott Paper Co. v. Scott’s Liquid Gold, Inc., 589 F.2d 1225, 1229 (3d Cir.1978); Scarves by Vera, Inc. v. Todo Imports Ltd., 544 F.2d 1167, 1173 (2d Cir.1976); Scott v. Mego International, Inc., 519 F.Supp. 1118, 1128-35 (D.Minn.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1983
See, Amstar Corp. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 263 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980) 7 Shakey's correctly points out that, under Oregon law, when there is evidence of actual confusion among consumers, the court may not rule that competing tradenames are dissimilar as a matter of law.
cited
Cited "see"
Shakey's Inc. v. Covalt
See, Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 263 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Barry Wong
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985 , 1003 n. 23 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tussel v. Witco Chemical Corp.
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985 , 1003 n. 23 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); United States v. Hayes, 553 F.2d 824 , 827 n. 4 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 867 , 98 S.Ct. 204 , 54 L.Ed.2d 143 (1977); United States v. Smith, 551 F.2d 348 , 358 n. 20 (D.C.Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
ca3 1983
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lee v. United States
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 997 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980) (smoking of marijuana during the course of trial does not require new trial absent showing of prejudice; is not prejudicial as a matter of law); United States v. Taliaferro, 558 F.2d 724 , *774 726 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1016 , 98 S.Ct. 734 , 54 L.Ed.2d 761 (1978) (showing of prejudice required when new trial sought because jurors drank alcoholic beverages during dinner recess). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickens
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joy Jimmy Neal
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 997 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 ; United States v. Gigax, 605 F.2d 507, 514-15 (10th Cir.); Max-field v. United States, 360 F.2d 97, 103 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 830 , 87 S.Ct. 66 , 17 L.Ed.2d 66 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Rock v. Zimmerman
Thus, prejudice is to be presumed only in cases where “the influence of the news media, either in the community at large or in the courtroom itself, pervaded the proceedings.” Murphy v. Florida, supra. 421 U.S. at 794 , 95 S.Ct. at 2031 ; see United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 995 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
American Rice, Inc. v. Arkansas Rice Growers Cooperative Ass'n
See Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252, 258-59 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); Boston Professional Hockey, supra, at 1010.
cited
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Bedford, Warren
See United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 1003 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert A. Lebovitz
(2×)
When faced with the failure of the trial court to undertake the articulated balancing which this court has on numerous occasions directed, id.; see United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 1003 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980) (in context of Rule 609 balancing), we have followed two paths.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tariq
See United States v. Gonzales, 617 F.2d 1358, 1363 (9 Cir. 1980) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stocki v. Nunn
See, eg., Barnes, 858 P.2d at 529 and United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985, 1004 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 267 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lane Capital Management, Inc. v. Lane Capital Management, Inc.
See, e.g., Amstar Corp. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252 (5th Cir.) (“Domino” not primarily merely surname), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899 , 101 S.Ct. 268 , 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980); Fisher Radio Corp. v. Bird Elec.
Bowers
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-17.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (1) · D. New Jersey (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.