Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apts., Ltd., 449 U.S. 901 (1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apts., Ltd., 449 U.S. 901 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Isquith ex rel. Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc. (ca5, 1988-06-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Isquith ex rel. Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See SEC v. Mize, 615 F.2d 1046, 1051-55 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 901 , 101 S.Ct. 271 , 66 L.Ed.2d 131 (1980). .
discussed Cited "see" Isquith v. Middle South Utilities, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See SEC v. Mize, 615 F.2d 1046, 1051-55 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 901 , 101 S.Ct. 271 , 66 L.Ed.2d 131 (1980) 15 In taking the position that a company's failure to disclose predictions is not actionable, the district court said it was afraid that negative predictions could become "self-fulfilling prophec[ies]." We are not convinced that such a fear is enough, by itself, to justify the nondisclosure, under all circumstances, of all predictions which portray companies in a negative light.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Etalook v. Exxon Pipeline Company
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd., 436 F.Supp. 1125, 1147-50 (D.Okla.1977) aff'd in part, 622 F.2d 466 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 901 , 101 S.Ct. 271 , 66 L.Ed.2d 131 (1980) (rejecting the argument that laches is not available to defendants in actions brought by Indians with respect to their restricted lands in a case where the plaintiff sold her land, raised no objections when the defendant developed the land, and then brought an action for quiet title). 27 In summary, we reject Etalook's argument that she is entitled to damages reflecting the values of the improv…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Etalook v. Exxon Pipeline Co.
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd., 436 F.Supp. 1125, 1147-50 (D.Okla.1977) aff'd in part, 622 F.2d 466 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 901 , 101 S.Ct. 271 , 66 L.Ed.2d 131 (1980) (rejecting the argument that laches is not available to defendants in actions brought by Indians with respect to their restricted lands in a case where the plaintiff sold her land, raised no objections when the defendant developed the land, and then brought an action for quiet title).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Armstrong
v.
Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd.
No. 80-210.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1980.
449 U.S. 901
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.