green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Stoecklein v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.
See Ewald v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 620 F.2d 1183 (6th Cir.1980), vacated, 449 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 311 , 66 L.Ed.2d 143 (1980), on remand, 644 F.2d 884 (6th Cir. 1981); Ciccone v. Textron, Inc., 616 F.2d 1216 (1st Cir.1980), vacated, 449 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 311 , 66 L.Ed.2d 143 (1980), on remand, 651 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 917 , 101 S.Ct. 3052 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rasimas v. Michigan Department of Mental Health
See Ciccone v. Textron, Inc., 616 F.2d 1216 (1st Cir.1980), vacated, 449 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 311 , 66 L.Ed.2d 143 (1980), on remand, 651 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 917 , 101 S.Ct. 3052 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); Ewald v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., 620 F.2d 1183 (6th Cir.1980), vacated, 449 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 311 , 66 L.Ed.2d 143 (1980), on remand, 644 F.2d 884 (6th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
32 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 688, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,758 David L. Rasimas, Cross-Appellee v. Michigan Department of Mental Health, Cross-Appellant
See Ciccone v. Textron, Inc., 616 F.2d 1216 (1st Cir.1980), vacated, 449 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 311 , 66 L.Ed.2d 143 (1980), on remand, 651 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 917 , 101 S.Ct. 3052 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); Ewald v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., 620 F.2d 1183 (6th Cir.1980), vacated, 449 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 311 , 66 L.Ed.2d 143 (1980), on remand, 644 F.2d 884 (6th Cir.1981). 28 We agree with the Third Circuit's opinion in Davis v. Calgon Corporation, 627 F.2d 674 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1101 , 101 S.Ct. 897 , 66 L.Ed.2d 827 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Curto v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
(2×)
See Ewald v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 620 F.2d 1183, 1186-87 (6th Cir.), vacated, 449 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 311 , 66 L.Ed.2d 143 (1980); Ciccone v. Textron, Inc., 616 F.2d 1216 (1st Cir.), vacated, 449 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 311 , 66 L.Ed.2d 143 (1980); Gabriele v. Chrysler Corp., 573 F.2d 949, 955 (6th Cir.1978), vacated, 442 U.S. 908 , 99 S.Ct. 2819 , 60 L.Ed.2d 273 (1979); Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc., 569 F.2d 187, 194 (3d Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 87 , 58 L.Ed.2d 113 (1978).
examined
Cited "see"
Arthur N. ARONSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CROWN ZELLERBACH, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
(3×)
See Ewald v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 620 F.2d 1183, 1186-87 (6th Cir. 1980), judgment summarily vacated, 449 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 311 , 66 L.Ed.2d 143 (1981); Cic-cone v. Textron, Inc., 616 F.2d 1216 (1st Cir. 1980), judgment summarily vacated, 449 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 311 , 66 L.Ed.2d 143 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California
v.
Teresinski
v.
Teresinski
No. 79-1998.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1980.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Crews, 445 U. S. 463 (1980).