Nat'l Coalition for Pub. Educ. & Religious Liberty v. Hufstedler, 449 U.S. 808 (1980). · Go Syfert
Nat'l Coalition for Pub. Educ. & Religious Liberty v. Hufstedler, 449 U.S. 808 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bailey v. Sharp (ca7, 1986-02-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Bailey v. Sharp
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Coalition for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Hufstedler, 449 U.S. 808 , 101 S.Ct. 55 , 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980), dismissing for want of jurisdiction an appeal from 489 F.Supp. 1248 (S.D.N.Y.) (the dismissal does not state reasons, but the only one given in the papers before the Court was Rule 77(d)).
discussed Cited "see" Bailey v. Sharp
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Coalition for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Hufstedler, 449 U.S. 808 , 101 S.Ct. 55 , 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980), dismissing for want of jurisdiction an appeal from 489 F.Supp. 1248 (S.D.
discussed Cited "see" Felton v. Secretary, United States Department Of Education
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Coalition for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Harris, 489 F.Supp. 1248 (S.D.N.Y.), appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 808 , 101 S.Ct. 55 , 66 L.Ed.2d 11 (1980) [hereafter cited as "PEARL "].
cited Cited "see, e.g." Town of Atlantic Beach v. Young
N.C. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. School, 299 N.C. 351, 359 , 261 S.E. 2d 908, 914 , appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 807 , 66 L.Ed. 2d 11 , 101 S.Ct. 55 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Coalition for Public Education and Religious Liberty
v.
Hufstedler, Secretary of Education
No. 79-2044.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
449 U.S. 808
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.