Werner v. Upjohn Co., 449 U.S. 1080 (1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Werner v. Upjohn Co., 449 U.S. 1080 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
94 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 33 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Midwest Specialties, Inc. v. Crown Industrial Products Co. (ohnd, 1996-10-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Midwest Specialties, Inc. v. Crown Industrial Products Co.
N.D. Ohio · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 858 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" 38 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1213, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,528 in Re Joint Eastern District and Southern District Asbestos Litigation. Anne McPadden Individually and as of the Estate of Martin McPadden (Deceased) v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Fibreboard Corporation Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation Celotex Corporation Eagle-Picher Industries, Incorporated Gaf Corporation Pittsburgh Corning Corporation H.K. Porter Company, Inc. Owens-Illinois, Incorporated A.P. Green Industries Inc. U.S. Mineral Products Co. A.C. And S. Inc. United States Gypsum Co. National Gypsum Company Babcock & Wilcox Company Combustion Engineering, Inc. Rockwool Manufacturing Co. v. John Crane-Houdaille Inc.
2d Cir. · 1993 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 856-58 (4th Cir.1980) (subsequent revised warnings of drug's side effects were not admissible under either negligence or strict products liability principles), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981). 19 In denying Crane's post-trial motion, the district court concluded that "plaintiff's use of the label evidence focused on the statement that no warning labels were placed on the products at the time of McPadden's exposure, not that the labels were placed on the products later because Crane recognized the danger." 798 F.Supp…
discussed Cited "see" McPadden v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1993 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 856-58 (4th Cir.1980) (subsequent revised warnings of drug’s side effects were not admissible under either negligence or strict products liability principles), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited Cited "see" Joanne Kotler, Individually and as Administratrix, Etc. v. The American Tobacco Company
1st Cir. · 1990 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 858 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" 19 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 583, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,904 Sherwin W. Fish and Leona B. Fish, Cross-Appellants v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Diamond International Corporation and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Georgia-Pacific Corporation and Diamond International Corporation, Cross-Appellees
2d Cir. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 853 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981). 15 Nor was the evidence of the warning admissible on the limited issue of the "feasibility" of providing a warning in 1977.
discussed Cited "see" Larry Hale and Linda Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, the Budd Company. Larry Hale and Linda Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, the Budd Company
8th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
Appellees do not contend that Budd had knowledge of the documents but rather argue that the documents were offered to prove defect and that knowledge by the manufacturer of the defect is not required in a strict liability case. 51 "Once evidence admissible for one purpose but inadmissible for another is admitted, the trial court cannot refuse a requested limiting instruction." Chematron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1185 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1013 , 103 S.Ct. 1254 , 75 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982); see Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 854 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449…
discussed Cited "see" Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
8th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
“Once evidence admissible for one purpose but inadmissible for another is admitted, the trial court cannot refuse a, requested limiting instruction.” Chematron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1185 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1013 , 103 S.Ct. 1254 , 75 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982); see Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 854 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited Cited "see" Bernier v. BOARD OF COUNTY RD. COM'RS FOR IONIA COUNTY
W.D. Mich. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848 at 853 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1980).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Villari v. Terminix International, Inc.
E.D. Pa. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Werner v. Upjohn Co., Inc., 628 F.2d 848, 856 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Emeilia Cann and Charles Cann v. Ford Motor Company
2d Cir. · 1981 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Farner v. Paccar, Inc., 562 F.2d 518 (8th Cir. 1977), and Robbins v. Farmer’s Union Grain Terminal Ass’n, 552 F.2d 788 (8th Cir. 1977) with Oberst v. International Harvester Co., 640 F.2d 863 (7th Cir. 1980) and Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 857 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 *60 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981), but for the reasons set forth below we refuse to so limit the scope of Rule 407.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Werner
v.
Upjohn Co., Inc.
No. 80-680.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1981.
449 U.S. 1080
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.