green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
8.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1984 ·
…act of state analysis depends upon a careful case-by-case analysis of the extent to which the separation of powers concerns on which the doctrine is based are implicated by the action before the court.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Michael Zernicek v. Brown & Root, Inc., Petroleos Mexicanos
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
But see Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 , 311 & n. 32 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982); Note, Effects Juris *418 diction Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and the Due Process Clause, 55 N.Y.U.L.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Newport Components, Inc. v. NEC Home Electronics (U.S.A.), Inc.
ince service was made under section 1608, the relevant area in delineating contacts is the entire united states, not merely new york
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Margot Berkovitz v. The Islamic Republic of Iran
breach of an agreement is necessarily performed 'in connection with' that agreement, or with a series of similar agreements.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Garcia v. Chase Manhattan Bank
act of state analysis depends upon a careful case-by-case analysis of the extent to which the separation of powers concerns on which the doctrine is based are implicated by the action before the court.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Garcia v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
act of state analysis depends upon a careful case-by-case analysis of the extent to which the separation of powers concerns on which the doctrine is based are implicated by the action before the court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Parex Bank v. Russian Savings Bank
Subject Matter Jurisdiction Where a case is brought against a “foreign state,” the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1830 , 1602 et seq., provides that personal jurisdiction exists where there is both subject matter jurisdiction and proper service. 28 U.S.C. § 1330 (a), (b); see Seetransport Wiking Trader v. Navimpex Centrala Novala, 989 F.2d 572, 578 (2d Cir.1993) (citing Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 308 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982)).
cited
Cited "see"
Interlotto, Inc. v. National Lottery Administration
See Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 314 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dominican Energy Ltd., Inc. v. Dominican Republic
See Saudi Arabia v. Nelson, 507 U.S. 349 , -, 113 S.Ct. 1471, 1477 , 123 L.Ed.2d 47 (1993) (citing Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nig., 647 F.2d 300 , 308 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
De Smeth v. Bank of New York
See Decor by Nikkei International, Inc. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 497 F.Supp. 893, 906-07 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Weltover, Inc. Springdale Enterprises, Inc. Bank Cantrade, A.G. v. Republic of Argentina Banco Central De La Argentina
Id.; see Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 308-09 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Shapiro v. The Republic of Bolivia, the Bolivian Air Force and the Central Bank of Bolivia
See Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir.1981) (conducting de novo review of dismissal on sovereign immunity grounds), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Marathon International Petroleum Supply Co. v. I.T.I. Shipping, S.A.
See Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Rep. of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 , 312 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Walpex Trading Co. v. Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales Bolivanos
See, Texas Trading v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 , 313 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
LeDonne v. Gulf Air, Inc.
See Verlinden B.V. v. Central Bank of Nigeria, 461 U.S. 480, 498 , 103 S.Ct. 1962, 1973 , 76 L.Ed.2d 81 (1983). 9 But in so doing, Congress offered scant guidance. 10 Not surprisingly, *1408 therefore, courts have struggled with this issue, occasionally reaching confusing or inconsistent results. 11 After reviewing the decisions on this issue, 12 this Court is persuaded that the “private party” test in Texas Trading v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982), is the key to the proper application of Secti…
discussed
Cited "see"
Enrique Segni v. Commercial Office of Spain
See Practical Concepts, 811 F.2d at 1549 , citing Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 309 (2d Cir.1981) (“If the activity is one in which a private person could engage, it is not entitled to immunity.”), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982); De Sanchez, 770 F.2d at 1394 (“Where a state enters into a contract that is sovereign in nature, however, the balancing of interests is different.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerritsen v. De La Madrid Hurtado
Sec. 73 comment b (1965); see Sec. 81 comment b 7 Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 , 310 n. 27 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982), notes that dicta in Heany relating to a wholly separate issue was superseded by 28 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Gregorian v. Izvestia
See Texas Trading & Mill Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 , 311-313 (2nd Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Segni v. Commercial Office of Spain
See Texas Trading v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 , 310 n. 27 (2d Cir.1981) cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Islamic Rep. of Iran, 758 F.2d 341 , 349 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 347 , 88 L.Ed.2d 294 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walpex Trading Co. v. Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales Bolivianos
See Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 314 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982) (where service of process is made upon the instrumentality of a foreign state pursuant to § 1608 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, the relevant geographic area for determining defendant’s contacts is the United States, not merely New York).
cited
Cited "see"
William F. Callejo, Individually and as Trustee, and Adelfa B. Callejo, as Trustee v. Bancomer, S.A.
See Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 308 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Castillo v. Shipping Corp. of India
See Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Bank of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 308 (2d Cir.1981), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atari, Inc. v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank
See Nikkei International, Inc. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 497 F.Supp. 893, 907 (S.D.N.Y. 1980), aff'd, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982) (applying pre-UCC contract law principles to a letter of credit governed solely by the UCPDC).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gregory Allen Persinger v. Islamic Republic of Iran
(2×)
The Act expressly deprives a court of jurisdiction over any party entitled to sovereign immunity. 28 U.S.C. § 1604 (1976) (“[A] foreign state shall be immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States____”) (emphasis added); see Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 306-07 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982); cf. Tuck v. Pan American Health Organization, 668 F.2d 547, 549 (D.C.Cir.1981) (immunity issue must be addressed before merits).
cited
Cited "see"
John D. McKeel Jr. v. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America
See Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 310 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982); H.R.
cited
Cited "see"
Tri-Ex Enterprises, Inc. v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.
See Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 305 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Goodsons & Co., Inc. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria
See, Decor by Nikkei International v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 497 F.Supp. 893 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (Pierce, J.), aff’d sub nom, Texas Trading & Milling Co. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hallwood Realty Partners, L.P. v. Gotham Partners, L.P.
See, e.g., Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 314 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982); Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc., 519 F.2d 974, 998-1000 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1018 , 96 S.Ct. 453 , 46 L.Ed.2d 389 (1975); Mariash v. Morrill, 496 F.2d 1138, 1143 (2d Cir.1974); Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. Maxwell, 468 F.2d 1326 , 1341-44 (2d Cir.1972); Ryan v. Allen, 97 Civ. 0055(HB), 1997 WL 567717 , *2 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Willingway Hospital, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ohio
Wright and Miller, § 1067.1; see e.g., Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 (2nd Cir.1981), cert. denied 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 ; Horne v. Adolph Coors Co., 684 F.2d 255 (3rd Cir.1982); and FTC v. Jim Walter Corp., 651 F.2d 251 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ampac Group Inc. v. Republic of Honduras
Weltover, — U.S. at —, 112 S.Ct. at 2168 ; see also Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Rep. of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 , 312 (2d Cir.1981) (because a corporation cannot be “crushed or burned” but only suffer a financial harm, “the relevant inquiry under the direct effect clause when plaintiff is a corporation is whether the corporation has suffered a ‘direct’ financial loss”), cert. denied 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fickling v. Com. of Australia
See, e.g., Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 309-310 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
M.B.I. International Contractors, Inc. v. Republic of Trinidad & Tobago
See also Texas Trading & Milling v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 500 F.Supp. 320 , 323 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1980), rev'd on other grounds, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982); Ohntrup v. Firearms Center, Inc., 516 F.Supp. 1281 (E.D.Pa.1981), aff’d without opinion, 760 F.2d 259 , later proceeding, 802 F.2d 676 (3d Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gould, Inc., (86-3649), Plaintiff-Respondent, (86-8327) v. Pechiney Ugine Kuhlmann and Trefimetaux, (86-3649), Defendants-Petitioners, (86-8327)
See, e.g., Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982); Obenchain Corp. v. Corporation Nacionale de Inversiones, 656 F.Supp. 435 (W.D.Pa.1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Magnus Electronics, Inc. v. La Republica Argentina
See, e.g., Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 312 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Esquire Radio & Electronics, Inc. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Decor by Nikkei International, Inc. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria and Central Bank of Nigeria, 497 F.Supp. 893, 912 (S.D.N.Y. 1980), aff’d, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982); Zimmer v. Wells Management Corp., 366 F.Supp. 215, 216 (S.D.N.Y.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Colonial Bank v. Compagnie Generale Maritime Et Financiere
See, e.g., Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 500 F.Supp. *1462 320, 323 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1980), rev’d on other grounds, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982); Verlinden B.V. v. Central Bank of Nigeria, 488 F.Supp. 1284, 1300-02 (S.D.N.Y.1980),. aff'd on other grounds, 647 F.2d 320 (2d Cir.1981), rev’d on other grounds, 461 U.S. 480 , 103 S.Ct. 1962 , 76 L.Ed.2d 81 (1983). 11 Also, engagement. in commercial activity in the United States was found not to constitute an implicit waiver of sovereign immunity.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Josefina Najarro De Sanchez v. Banco Central De Nicaragua, a Foreign Banking Corporation
(2×)
Callejo, 764 F.2d 1101 (defendant breached certificates of deposit that it had sold to plaintiffs while it was still a private bank); Arango, 621 F.2d 1371 (Dominican national airline breached tour package); see also Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir.1981) (Nigerian government breached cement-purchase contracts), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982). 11 Conversely, we hold here that the sovereign nature of Banco Central's issuance of the check imbued its later breach with sovereignty.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Friedar v. Government of Israel
See, e.g., Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Toyota Motor Corp.
This is not a case where the forum-related conduct results from negligent, rather than purposeful, activities, as in Insurance Co. of North America v. Marina Salina Cruz, 649 F.2d 1266, 1270-71 (9th Cir.1981), nor where the corporation is owned or controlled by an agency of a foreign sovereign, as in Kramer Motors, supra, 628 F.2d at 1178 ; see also Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 , 315-16 n. 37 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1148 , 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James K. Gilson v. The Republic of Ireland, Gaeltarra Eireann, an Instrumentality of the Republic of Ireland, Industrial Development Division, Furbo
See, e.g., Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1012 , 71 L.Ed.2d 301 (1982); Gemini Shipping, Inc. v. Foreign Trade Org. for Chem. & Foodstuffs, 647 F.2d 317 (2d Cir. 1981); Verlinden B.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCoy Restaurants, Inc.
v.
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority
v.
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority
No. 81-888.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1982.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.