green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
10.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“all questions material to the order are properly before the Court of Appeals”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Vera Smith, as of the Estate of Robert J. Smith, Deceased v. Duff and Phelps, Inc., a Corporation, and Claire v. Hansen
all questions material to the order are properly before the court of appeals
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Fickett
if felony murder conviction had been determined on appeal to have been based on insufficient evidence, clearly no reprosecution could have been permitted
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Tynan
appellate review of a district court's discretion is very limited. generally, an abuse of discretion only occurs where no reasonable person could take the view adopted by the trial court
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States ex rel. Woodard v. Tynan
appellate review of a district court's discretion is very limited. generally, an abuse of discretion only occurs where no reasonable person could take the view adopted by the trial court
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Association for Reduction of Violence v. Frank A. Hall
we recognize the state's strong and legitimate interest in preserving the confidentiality of sources of information necessary for parole release decisions and in maintaining security and discipline within its institutions
cited
Cited "see"
Collins v. City of Bridgeport
See Devon Corp. v. Miller, 167 W.Va. 362 , 280 S.E.2d 108 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982); and Shell v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. Philips Corporation v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
See Cassidy, 892 F.2d at 641 (Because the doctrine of judicial estoppel "is intended to protect the courts rather than the litigants," it is proper for the appellate court to raise the estoppel "in an appropriate case.") Appellate review of the interlocutory order is not confined to the precise questions certified by the district court. "[A]ll questions material to the order are properly before the court of appeals." Nuclear Engineering Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241, 246 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. Philips Corp. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
See Cassidy, 892 F.2d at 641 (Because the doctrine of judicial estoppel “is intended to protect the courts rather than the litigants,” it is proper for the appellate court to raise the estoppel “in an appropriate case.”) Appellate review of the interlocutory order is not confined to the precise questions certified by the district court. “[A]ll questions material to the order are properly before the court of appeals.” Nuclear Engineering Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241, 246 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Sterling Dicken Donald Harden, Edward H. Pennington v. John Ashcroft Board of Probation and Parole Dept. Of Corrections Cranston Mitchell Dick Moore
See Williams v. Board of Probation & Parole, 661 F.2d 697, 698 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1621 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Edward Parton v. Bill Armontrout, Edward Parton v. Bill Armontrout
See Williams v. Missouri Bd. of Probation & Parole, 661 F.2d 697, 699 (8th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1621 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Foster v. Hallco Mfg. Co., Inc.
Accord, Nuclear Engineering Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Terry Ray Sluder v. United Mine Workers Of America, International Union
See Lingle, 108 S.Ct. at 1881 n. 5. 25 The plaintiffs cannot escape the application of these principles and " 'deny a defendant his right to a federal forum by artfully disguising an essentially federal law claim in terms of state law.' " Oglesby v. RCA Corp., 752 F.2d 272, 275 (7th Cir.1985) (quoting Nuclear Engineering Co., Inc. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241, 249 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982)). 26 Under the usual application of these principles, a determination that the plaintiff had stated a federal cause of action under section 301 of the LMRA…
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1988
See Nuclear Eng'g Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241, 248 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982); Gresham Park Community Org. v. Howell, 652 F.2d 1227 , 1236 n. 25 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fietz v. Great Western Savings (In re Fietz)
See Nuclear Eng’g Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241, 248 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982); Gresham Park Community Org. v. Howell, 652 F.2d 1227 , 1236 n. 25 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Candelaria v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District
See Nuclear Engineering Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982); see also Note, New Mexico’s Analogue to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b): Interlocutory Appeals Come to the State Courts, 2 N.M.L.Rev. 113 (1972); Note, Interlocutory Appeals in the Federal Courts Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b), 88 Harv.L.Rev. 607 (1974-1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. J. Michael Robilotto, Louis D. Spagnola and Anthony v. Civitello, Defendants
See United States v. Garza, 664 F.2d 135, 142-43 (7th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1620 , 71 L.Ed.2d 854 (1982); see also United States v. Toliver, 541 F.2d 958, 963 (2d Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edwardsville National Bank and Trust Company, Administrator of the Estate of Chadwick Slone v. Marion Laboratories, Inc.
See Nuclear Engineering Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241, 246 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982); CAB v. Tour Travel Enterprises, Inc., 605 F.2d 998 , 1003 n. 12 (7th Cir.1979). *651 See also 16 Wright, Miller, Cooper & Gressman, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3929 at 144-45 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Drew
See United States v. Garza, 664 F.2d 135, 141 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 (1982); United States v. DeCoteau, 648 F.2d 1191, 1192 (8th Cir. 1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry Lynn Hendrix, James George Shepherd, Russell Edward Merritt
See United States v. Garza, 664 F.2d 135, 141 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1620 , 71 L.Ed.2d 854 (1982) .
cited
Cited "see"
Opinion No.
See Nuclear Engineering Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241 , 249 n. 10 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Abdallah W. Tamari, Ludwig W. Tamari, Farah Tamari, Co-Partners D/B/A Wahbe Tamari & Sons Co. v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., a Lebanese Corporation
See Nuclear Engineering Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hewitt v. Joyce Beverages Of Wisconsin
See Nuclear Engineering Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241 , 245 n. 7 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982); Anschul v. Sitmar Cruises, Inc., 544 F.2d 1364, 1369 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 907 , 97 S.Ct. 272 , 50 L.Ed.2d 189 (1976). 5 We may hear an interlocutory appeal under Sec. 1292(b) only if two steps are completed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hewitt v. Joyce Beverages of Wisconsin, Inc.
See Nuclear Engineering Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241 , 245 n. 7 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982); Anschul v. Sitmar Cruises, Inc., 544 F.2d 1364, 1369 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 907 , 97 S.Ct. 272 , 50 L.Ed.2d 189 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca7 1983
We disagree. 18 The joinder of these defendants in a single indictment was proper under Rule 8(b), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, because they were "alleged to have participated in the ... same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses." FED.R.CRIM.P. 8(b); see United States v. Garza, 664 F.2d 135, 142 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1620 , 71 L.Ed.2d 854 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ras
The joinder of these defendants in a single indictment was proper under Rule 8(b), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, because they were “alleged to have participated in the ... same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses.” Fed.R.Crim.P. 8(b); see United States v. Garza, 664 F.2d 135, 142 (7th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1620 , 71 L.Ed.2d 854 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Menominee Indian Tribe v. Drug Enforcement Administration
In this kind of action, the test for determining whether the Tribe has a federal cause of action under the Declaratory Judgment Act requires asking “whether a ‘coercive action’ brought by the declaratory judgment defendant ,.. would necessarily present a federal question.” Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC, — U.S.-,-, 134 S.Ct. 843, 848 , 187 L.Ed.2d 703 (2014) (quoting Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for S. Cal., 463 U.S. 1, 19 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983)); see also GNB Battery Technologies, Inc. v. Gould, Inc., 65 F.3d 6…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Steering Committee v. United States of America, and Aeromexico
See also Nuclear Engineering Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241, 246 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Unix System Laboratories, Inc. v. Berkeley Software Design, Inc.
Once the jurisdictional facts have been challenged, the court may receive evidence from all parties and “no presumptive truthfulness attaches to plaintiffs allegations, and the existence of disputed material facts will not preclude the trial court from evaluating for itself the merits of jurisdictional claims.” Mortensen v. First Federal Sav. and Loan Ass’n, 549 F.2d 884, 891 (3d Cir.1977) (discussing a Rule 12(b)(1) factual attack on jurisdiction); see also Nuclear Engineering Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241 (7th Cir.1981) (once defendant attacks jurisdiction, plaintiff must support jurisdic…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Casamento
See Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731, 736 , 89 S.Ct. 1420, 1423 , 22 L.Ed.2d 684 (1969) (“Many things might happen during the course of the trial which would prevent the presentation of all the evidence described in advance.”); see also United States v. Garza, 664 F.2d 135, 142 (7th Cir.1981) (defendant has burden of establishing prosecutorial bad faith), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1620 , 71 L.Ed.2d 854 (1982); United States v. Turkette, 656 F.2d 5, 8-9 (1st Cir.1981) (same); United States v. Biaggi, 672 F.Supp. 112 , 119 n. 14 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Casamento
See Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731, 736 , 89 S.Ct. 1420, 1423 , 22 L.Ed.2d 684 (1969) ("Many things might happen during the course of the trial which would prevent the presentation of all the evidence described in advance."); see also United States v. Garza, 664 F.2d 135, 142 (7th Cir.1981) (defendant has burden of establishing prosecutorial bad faith), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1620 , 71 L.Ed.2d 854 (1982); United States v. Turkette, 656 F.2d 5, 8-9 (1st Cir.1981) (same); United States v. Biaggi, 672 F.Supp. 112 , 119 n. 14 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (same).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Finley
See also United States v. Garza, 664 F.2d 135, 138 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1620 , 71 L.Ed.2d 854 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John F. \Jack\" Walsh v. Ford Motor Company"
See, e.g., Nuclear Eng’g Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241, 246 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982); Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820, 822-23 (3d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 822 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Highland
(2×)
See also Syl. pt. 2, Devon Corporation v. Miller, 280 S.E.2d 108 (W.Va.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Huffington v. State
See, e.g., Wilson v. Meyer, 665 F.2d 118, 125 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1621 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raymond Kane and Robert A. Scott
See also United States v. Garza, 664 F.2d 135, 143 (7th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1620 , 71 L.Ed.2d 854 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The United States v. Patrick J. Connolly
See, e.g., Nuclear Engineering Co. v. Scott, 660 F.2d 241, 246 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1622 , 71 L.Ed.2d 855 (1982); Consolidated Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Association, 602 F.2d 494, 502 (3d Cir.1979), vacated on other grounds, 448 U.S. 902 , 100 S.Ct. 3040 , 65 *885 L.Ed.2d 1131 (1980); Dyke v. Gulf Oil Corp., 601 F.2d 557 , 559 n. 3 (Em.App.1979); Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820, 822-23 (3d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Illinois Department of Rehabilitation Services
(2×)
See, e.g., Harrington v. De Vito, 656 F.2d 264 , 269 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 993 , 102 S.Ct. 1621 , 71 L.Ed.2d 854 (1982) (fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 ). 8 Jones contends that the trial court abused its discretion because, although it adverted to the factors for evaluating fees claims set by this court in Muscare v. Quinn, 614 F.2d 577, 579 (7th Cir. 1980) (adopting test of Waters v. Wisconsin Steel Works, 502 F.2d 1309 , 1322 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 997 , 96 S.Ct. 2214 , 48 L.Ed.2d 823 (1976), in § 1988 cases), it offered no analysis of them, and did not…
In re Nearis
No. 81-6125.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1982.
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.