green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Blair v. State
See United States v. Page, 661 F.2d 1080, 1083 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982) (affirming trial court's acceptance of defense counsel's assurances that defendant wished to waive jury trial after lengthy consultation); United States v. Agee, 83 F.3d 882 , 886 n. 5 (7th Cir.1996) (explaining when "there is a direct and specific discussion between defense counsel and the trial court regarding the waiver, the court can make the inquiries necessary to be confident that the defendant *1218 understood the right he or she was waiving and willingly r…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lorain NAACP v. Lorain Board of Education
See, Reed v. Rhodes, 422 F.Supp. 708 , (N.D.Ohio 1976), modified, 607 F.2d 714 (1979) cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Columbus Board of Ed. v. Penick, 443 U.S. 449 , 99 S.Ct. 2941 , 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979); Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, 443 U.S. 526 , 99 S.Ct. 2971 , 61 L.Ed.2d 720 (1979); Bronson v. Bd. of Ed. of Cincinnati, 604 F.Supp. 68 (S.D.Ohio 1948). 19 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc.
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). 16 The phone calls to the merchants hurt Drinkwine but were in the merchants' interest.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dolphin Tours, Inc. v. Pacifico Creative Service, Inc.
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1261-62 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982) (where plaintiff had to make fourteen percent market share to *1511 make a profit, failure to account for defendant’s “competitive reaction” in estimating market share was a causation issue because plaintiff could not establish any injury without establishing that it would have achieved the fourteen percent market share).
cited
Cited "see"
Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc.
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Freddie D. Gibson, Jr. v. Frank Blackburn, Warden
See United States v. Page, 661 F.2d 1080, 1082 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982); Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F.2d 1364, 1367 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878 , 103 S.Ct. 173 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jonathan Garrett and Christopher Garrett
See United States v. Page, 661 F.2d 1080, 1082-83 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bronson v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF CINCINNATI
See, Reed v. Rhodes, 500 F.Supp. 404 (N.D.Ohio 1980), aff'd, 662 F.2d 1219 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Penick v. Board of Education, 519 F.Supp. 925 (S.D.Ohio 1981), aff'd, 663 F.2d 24 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
Accord, Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1260-63 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
Accord, Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1260-63 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Business Systems v. North American Philips Corp.
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co., 467 F.Supp. 841, 859 (N.D.Cal. 1979), aff’d, 658 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Business Systems, a California Corporation v. North American Philips Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Philips Business Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and N v. Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken, a Nederland Corporation, North American Philips Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Counterclaim v. General Business Systems, a California Corporation Shasta General Systems, a California Corporation, Counterclaim
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co., 467 F.Supp. 841, 859 (N.D.Cal.1979), aff'd, 658 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). 64 The relationship between GBS and Shasta does not fall clearly at either of these extremes.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronwin v. State Bar of Arizona
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir. 1981) (special solicitude for proof of damages when defendant's conduct has been a factor in speculative nature of damages), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982) 10 28 U.S.C. § 144 provides: Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be …
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronwin v. State Bar
See Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir. 1981) (special solicitude for proof of damages when defendant’s conduct has been a factor in speculative nature of damages), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). . 28 U.S.C. § 144 provides: Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be ass…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Redden
See also United States v. Page, 661 F.2d 1080, 1081-83 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People Who Care v. Rockford Bd. of Educ.
See, e.g., Reed v. Rhodes, 455 F.Supp. 546 (N.D.Oh.1978), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 607 F.2d 714 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pride Communications Ltd. Partnership v. WCKG, Inc.
See, e.g., Reed v. Rhodes, 455 F.Supp. 546 (N.D.Oh.1978), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 607 F.2d 714 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alvarado Morales v. Digital Equipment Corp.
See, e.g., Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co., 467 F.Supp. 841 (N.D.Cal.1979), aff 'd, 658 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Beckwith, 617 F.Supp. at 189.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Willie X. Ross v. Ralph Kemp
(2×)
See also United States v. Page, 661 F.2d 1080 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
(2×)
See also Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1713 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Van Dyk Research Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 631 F.2d 251, 255 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ohio State Board of Education
v.
Reed and Ohio State Board of Education v. Penick
v.
Reed and Ohio State Board of Education v. Penick
No. 81-1330.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1982.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 662 F. 2d 1219 (first case); 663 F. 2d 24 (second case).