green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.9 score
“á trial court should not grant summary judgment for a defendant if there is a viable issue of fact' as to when the limitations period began.”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Jane Heslinga Cook v. G.D. Searle & Co., Inc., Dr. Brian Donaldson, Dr. David E. Bates
But cf. Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rail,-Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687, 691-92 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981) (federal tolling rules apply in fraud cases under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 where federal court applies state limitation in absence of federal limitation). 5 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Iron Workers Local Union No. 17 Insurance Fund v. Philip Morris Inc.
á trial court should not grant summary judgment for a defendant if there is a viable issue of fact' as to when the limitations period began.
cited
Cited "see"
Concepcion S. Wabol v. Victorino Villacrusis
See Guam v. Kingsbury, 649 F.2d 740, 742 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnston v. CIGNA Corp.
See State of Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 472 F.Supp. 402, 405 (D.Colo.1979), aff'd on other grounds, 651 F.2d 687, 691 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Concepcion S. Wabol v. Victorino Villacrusis
See Guam v. Kingsbury, 649 F.2d 740, 742 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Concepcion S. Wabol v. Victorino Villacrusis
See Guam, v. Kingsbury, 649 F.2d 740, 742 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Goichman v. City of Aspen
See Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 585 F.2d 454 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981) 2 Before filing its Answer, Aspen amended its towing and impoundment ordinance to "reaffirm[] and codify[] the City's procedures for providing notices of impoundment and hearings regarding removal and towing and storage fees of impounded vehicles." Record, vol. 2, at 205.
cited
Cited "see"
Goichman v. City of Aspen
See Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rail, Barber & Ross, 585 F.2d 454 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Esperanza Saa, Gabriel Saa, Martha Vega, Luis Andrade
See United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2, 16 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Bath v. Bushkin, Gaims, Gaines and Jonas
See Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rail, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687 , 689 n. 1 (10th Cir.1981) cert. denied 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Sterling & Esther Jensen v. George M. Snellings, III & Snellings, Breard, Sartor, Inabnett & Trascher, Defendants-Third Party Granada Corp. v. Appalachian Insurance Co., Third Party
See State of Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687, 694 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Jensen v. Snellings
See State of Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687, 694 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stone v. Fossil Oil & Gas
See State of Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687, 692 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); Houlihan v. Anderson & Stokes, Inc., 434 F.Supp. 1319, 1322-23 (D.D.C.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. A.W.J. (Juvenile)
See People of the Territory of Guam v. Kingsbury, 649 F.2d 740 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981) (jurisdiction based upon interpretation of relevant Guam statutes).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Riley
Section 11-51-123(1) is identical to section 101 of the Uniform Securities Act. 7B U.L.A. 516 (1985); see Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 472 F.Supp. 402, 405 (D.Colo.1979), aff'd 651 F.2d 687 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); People v. Terranova, 38 Colo.App. 476 , 480, 563 P.2d 363, 365 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Goichman v. City of Aspen
See Ohio v. Peterson, et al, 585 F.2d 454 (10th Cir.1978) cert, denied 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. C.G.
See Guam v. Kingsbury, 649 F.2d 740 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981); In Re: Doe, 86 N.M. 37 , 519 P.2d 133 (Ct.App.1974); and the cases cited in both. 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marcelo P. Tapia
See United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2, 14 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981). d.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Del Gaudio
Accord, United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); United States v. Bullock, 551 F.2d 1377 ; United States v. Acosta, 526 F.2d 670 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 920 , 96 S.Ct. 2625 , 49 L.Ed.2d 373 (1976); United States v. Johnson, 390 F. Supp. 1049 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 525 F.2d 999 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 920 , 96 S.Ct. 1127 , 47 L.Ed.2d 327 (1976). [5] *610 The existence of prejudice, then, is the sine qua non for relief from a discovery violation.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dekro v. Stern Bros. & Co.
See Ohio v. Peter *415 son, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 472 F.Supp. 402, 409 (D.Colo.1979) (fraudulent concealment requires “something more”) (Finesilver, J.), aff’d, 651 F.2d 687 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); Campbell, 498 F.Supp. at 727 (burden of proof is on plaintiffs since the doctrine is in avoidance of the statute of limitations).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bennett
See United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2 (C.A.1, 1981), cert. den., - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Salgado v. Piedmont Capital Corp.
See Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687 (10 Cir., 1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Citibank, N.A. v. Williams (In Re Williams)
Michael’s Credit Union, 880 F.2d 579 (1st Cir.1989); see also United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981). 4 An adverse inference *733 may be drawn against a party toward whom the missing-witness is favorably disposed.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Victor Martinez, United States of America v. Hector Vidal, United States of America v. Victor Martinez
Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure § 489 (1982)); see also United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2, 15-16 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
David C. Barker v. Wayne Estelle, Warden
Id. at 561-562, 86 S.Ct. at 1057 ; see also Guam v. Kingsbury, 649 F.2d 740, 743 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 210 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hector Torres, Bolivar De Leon, Luis Valenzuela and Secundino De Los Santos
See, e.g., United States v. Ariza-Ibarra, 651 F.2d 2, 15-17 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981) (availability may depend upon a witness’s predisposition towards a party); United States v. Mahone, 537 F.2d 922, 926-27 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1025 , 97 S.Ct. 646 , 50 L.Ed.2d 627 (1976) (local police officer peculiarly within federal government's control); Burgess, 440 F.2d at 232 (informer peculiarly within government’s control); United States v. Jackson, 257 F.2d 41, 43-44 (3d Cir.1958) (government informant not equally available); Unite…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sentry Corporation and Sne Corporation v. Ethel R. Harris, as Trustee Under Trust Agreement Dated March 1, 1973
First, the Supreme Court has previously recognized that federal law governs the issue of tolling in federal equity actions, see Holmberg, 327 U.S. at 395 , 66 S.Ct. at 584 ; see also State of Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rail, Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981); Tomera v. Galt, 511 F.2d 504, 509 (7th Cir.1975), a ruling that has been extended by the lower courts to actions at law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gieringer v. Silverman
See also Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rail, Barber & Ross, 472 F.Supp. 402, 410 (D.Colo. 1979), affirmed, 651 F.2d 687 (10th Cir. 1981) (collected cases at 692 n. 9), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gieringer v. Silverman
See also Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & Ross, 472 F.Supp. 402, 410 (D.Colo.1979), affirmed, 651 F.2d 687 (10th Cir.1981) (collected cases at 692 n. 9), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kingsbury
v.
Guam
v.
Guam
No. 81-220.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1981.
C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.