Cuthbertson v. CBS, Inc., 454 U.S. 1056 (1981). · Go Syfert
Cuthbertson v. CBS, Inc., 454 U.S. 1056 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“rule 17(c) requires a showing that the materials sought are currently admissible in evidence; it cannot be used as a device to gain understanding or explanation.”
47 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. King (vaed, 2000-07-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. King
E.D. Va. · 2000 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
cuthbertson //
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Cherry
S.D.N.Y. · 1995 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
rule 17(c) requires a showing that the materials sought are currently admissible in evidence; it cannot be used as a device to gain understanding or explanation.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Scarfo
E.D. Pa. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cuthbertson, 651 F.2d 189 (3d Cir.) (inadmissible hearsay materials not retrievable under Rule 17(c) subpoena), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1056 , 102 S.Ct. 604 , 70 L.Ed.2d 594 (1981).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Harrelson v. United States
W.D. Tex. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re Globe Newspaper Company, 920 F.2d 88, 91 (1st Cir.1990), (declining to determine whether there is a right to intervene possessed by a newspaper seeking to examine the names and addresses of jurors who had participated in a just-completed criminal trial but reviewing that same issue in the context of a mandamus action). 14 .See, e.g., United States v. Cuthbertson, 651 F.2d 189, 193 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1056 , 102 S.Ct. 604 , 70 L.Ed.2d 594 (1981), (holding the persons affected by the disclosure of allegedly privileged materials may intervene in pending criminal…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State Ex Rel. Charleston Mail Ass'n v. Ranson (2×)
W. Va. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Cuthbertson (Cuthbertson II), 651 F.2d 189, 198 (3d Cir.) (Seitz, C.J., concurring) (advocating in camera review of allegedly privileged materials requested by subpoena in order to “obtain an impartial determination of whether the documents contain material that is producible under the subpoena and, in the ease of a qualified privilege, whether such material is subject to disclosure under an appropriate balancing test”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1056 , 102 S.Ct. 604 , 70 L.Ed.2d 594 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cuthbertson
v.
CBS, Inc.
No. 81-5175.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1981.
454 U.S. 1056

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.