green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Tax violations are not a protected form of political dissent”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
McGahee v. Northern Propane Gas Co.
Adjusters Replace-A-Car, 735 F.2d at 890 ; Bayou Bottling, Inc. v. Dr. Pepper Co., 725 F.2d at 305 ; but see Malcolm v. Marathon Oil Co., 642 F.2d 845 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 975 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Elon Kevan Rowlee, Ii, and the New York Patriots Society for Individual Liberty Association
tax violations are not a protected form of political dissent
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
(PC) McRae v. Dikran
Cal. 1978), aff’d, 645 F.2d 699 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 16 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richardson v. Newland
See Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp., 80 F.R.D. 626 , 635 n. 1 (N.D.Cal.1978) (judicial notice may be taken of court records), affd, 645 F.2d 699 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981). 5 .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
(4×)
See United States v. Van Scoy, 654 F.2d 257, 260 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 977 , 71 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).”); United States v. York, 933 F.2d 1343, 1356 (7th Cir.) (finding that certain facts suggested that the informant was an “entrepreneur” who hoped to sell information to the government, not a government agent) (citing United States v. Watson, 894 F.2d 1345, 1348 (D.C.Cir.1990)), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 916 , 112 S.Ct. 321 , 116 L.Ed.2d 262 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Buckingham Township v. Wykle
See Noe v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth., 644 F.2d 434, 436-39 (5th Cir.1981) (“[T]o the extent the legislative history indicates any Congressional attitude, it indicates a desire not to provide a remedy for private individuals who may be injured by a violation of NEPA”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 977 , 71 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981); Jersey Heights Neighborhood Ass’n, 174 F.3d at 186 (no private right of action for failure to prepare proper EIS); Public Citizen v. United States Trade Rep., 5 F.3d 549, 551 (D.C.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1041 , 114 S.Ct. 685 , 126 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Fidel v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.
See Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp., 80 F.R.D. 626 , 633 n. 2 (N.D.Cal.1978), aff'd, 645 F.2d 699 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 (1981) (suggesting, in dicta, that class members were on inquiry notice because relevant facts were available in the settlement agreement filed with the court). 27 Additionally, the FDIC, in a memorandum filed with the district court on the day of the settlement hearing, set forth its objection to the cancellation of the National Union insurance policy.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thaddeus Lawrence Lach
See United States v. Ness, 652 F.2d 890 , 892 n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William Harry Brink
See United States v. Van Scoy, 654 F.2d 257, 260 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 5.Ct. 977, 71 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brink
See United States v. Van Scoy, 654 F.2d 257, 260 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent Caterino, United States of America v. James Caterino
See United States v. Ness, 652 F.2d 890, 893 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 (1981) (cautionary instruction can remedy prejudicial inferences of comments by judge).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mr. Furniture Warehouse, Inc., Mr. Wholesale, Inc., Howard Cassett v. Barclays American/commercial Inc., Stenhouse, James A/k/a, Jim Stenhouse
See Malcolm v. Marathon Oil Co., 642 F.2d 845, 860-61 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 975 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981) (quoting Aladdin Oil Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 603 F.2d 1107, 1115 (5th Cir.1979)). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Stitt Spark Plug Co. v. Champion Spark Plug Co.
See Malcolm v. Marathon Oil Co., 642 F.2d 845 , 853 n. 16 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 975 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981). 5 . 475 U.S. 574 , 106 S.Ct. 1348 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986); see also Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc., — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 484, 493-94 , 93 L.Ed.2d 427 (1986) (discussing predatory pricing). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
Graham v. Commissioner
See United States v. Ness, 652 F.2d 890, 892 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) (requiring showing of impermissible motive), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Katherine Jean Graham v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Richard M. Hermann v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, David Forbes Maynard v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
See United States v. Ness, 652 F.2d 890, 892 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) (requiring showing of impermissible motive), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981). 45 The decision of the Tax Court is AFFIRMED.
cited
Cited "see"
Brow v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
See Noe v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, 485 F.Supp. 501, 504 (N.D.Ga.1980), aff'd 644 F.2d 434 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 977 , 71 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
John R. (Bob) Park D/B/A Action Real Estate, Cross v. El Paso Board of Realtors, and E. Dempsey Gunaca, Defendants-Cross
See Malcolm v. Marathon Oil Co., 642 F.2d 845, 852 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 975 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); Note, Private Treble Damage Antitrust Suits: Measure of Damages for Destruction of All or Part of *1070 a Business, 80 Harv.L.Rev. 1566, 1573 (1967) (“[P]roof of a conspiracy fixing resale prices in the industry might suggest that a plaintiff retailer benefited from the artificially inflated prices.”).
cited
Cited "see"
George Pierce and Jeff Pierce, Individually and D/B/A Pierce Sales, a Partnership v. Ramsey Winch Company, a Foreign Corp.
See Malcolm v. Marathon Oil Co., 642 F.2d 845, 860-63 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 975 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Lee Spoone, Sr., United States of America v. James Lee Spoone, Jr., United States of America v. Michael Elbin Spoone, United States of America v. Kenneth Howard Bates, United States of America v. Richard Van Bael, United States of America v. Juliette Gay
See United States v. Van Scoy, 654 F.2d 257, 266-67 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 977 , 71 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981); United States v. Camacho, 528 F.2d 464, 468 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 995 , 96 S.Ct. 2208 , 48 L.Ed.2d 819 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Spoone
See United States v. Van Scoy, 654 F.2d 257, 266-67 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 977 , 71 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981); United States v. Camacho, 528 F.2d 464, 468 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 995 , 96 S.Ct. 2208 , 48 L.Ed.2d 819 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nolan
Four elements must be proved by the Government to make out a case of aiding and abetting: “[First,] the person who is being aided ... must be intentionally committing a crime; second, the aider or abettor must know that the other is committing a crime; third, the aider or abettor must have the purpose to aid that other to commit the crime; and, finally, fourth, the aider must in fact render aid or assistance.” United States v. Interstate Engineering Corporation, 288 F.Supp. 402, 428 (D.N.H. 1967) (Wyzanski, C.J.); see United States v. Van Scoy, 654 F.2d 257 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 454 U.S…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nolan
Hand, J., in United States v. Peoni, 2 Cir. 100 F.2d 401, 402 [ (1938) ]. 10 Four elements must be proved by the Government to make out a case of aiding and abetting: "[First,] the person who is being aided ... must be intentionally committing a crime; second, the aider or abettor must know that the other is committing a crime; third, the aider or abettor must have the purpose to aid that other to commit the crime; and, finally, fourth, the aider must in fact render aid or assistance." United States v. Interstate Engineering Corporation, 288 F.Supp. 402, 428 (D.N.H.1967) (Wyzanski, C.J.); see …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sun Myung Moon and Takeru Kamiyama
(2×)
See United States v. Ness, 652 F.2d 890, 892 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); United States v. Catlett, 584 F.2d 864, 866 (8th Cir.1978); Berrios, 501 F.2d at 1211 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
In our view, CAT did introduce “substantial evidence” that FRI's actions, assuming they violated the Sherman Act, resulted in cognizable injury to CAT’s business enterprise; See Malcolm v. Marathon Oil Co., 642 F.2d 845, 846-48 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 975 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
See Malcolm v. Marathon Oil Co., 642 F.2d 845, 846-48 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 975 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
J.T. Gibbons, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Crawford Fitting Co., Cross-Appellants
See Malcolm v. Marathon Oil Co., 642 F.2d 845, 852 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 975 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William T. Taylor, United States of America v. Billy J. Florence
(2×)
See United States v. Ness, 652 F.2d 890, 892 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wyman
See United States v. Ness, 652 F.2d 890, 893 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, *672 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nurse Midwifery Associates v. Hibbett
See Malcolm v. Marathon Oil Co., 642 F.2d 845 , 863 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 975 , 71 L.£d.2d 113 (1981); Trabert & Hoeffer, Inc. v. Piaget Watch Corp., 633 F.2d 477, 482-83 (7th Cir. 1980); Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. *1192 v. Federated Department Stores, Inc., 459 F.2d 138, 148-49 (6th Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kalt v. Hunter (In re Hunter)
If Kalt had alleged fraud upon the court, the court could have asserted ancillary jurisdiction because that doctrine is available to a court to “vindicate its authority, and effectuate its decrees.” Kokkonen , — U.S. at -, 114 S.Ct. at 1676 ; see also Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp., 645 F.2d 699, 700 (9th Cir.) (district court had jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ claims of fraud on the court), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Hunter
If Kalt had alleged fraud upon the court, the court could have asserted ancillary jurisdiction because that doctrine is available to a court to "vindicate its authority, and effectuate its decrees." Kokkonen, --- U.S. at ----, 114 S.Ct. at 1676 ; see also Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp., 645 F.2d 699, 700 (9th Cir.) (district court had jurisdiction over plaintiffs' claims of fraud on the court), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981). 16 Jurisdiction, however, is not derived from Rule 60(b) itself--the rule is silent on how independent actions are to be treated othe…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong, Aka: Chris Armstrong, and Robert Rozelle Aaron Hampton Freddie Mack Shelton Auntwan Martin, United States of America v. Christopher Lee Armstrong, Aka: Chris Armstrong
See e.g., United States v. Ness, 652 F.2d 890, 892 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Armstrong
See e.g., United States v. Ness, 652 F.2d 890, 892 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cresswell v. Sullivan & Cromwell
See, e.g., Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp., 645 F.2d 699, 700 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 (1981); 7 Moore's Federal Practice p 60.38, at 60-398 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cresswell v. Sullivan & Cromwell
See, e.g., Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp., 645 F.2d 699, 700 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 (1981); 7 Moore’s Federal Practice H 60.38[1], at 60-398 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A. v. Meese
In order to prevail in an allegation of selective enforcement, plaintiffs bear the burden of presenting a prima facie case showing both (1) “that others similarly situated generally have not been prosecuted for conduct similar to that for which [they were] prosecuted,” and (2) “that [their] selection was based on an impermissible ground such as race, religion or [their] exercise of [their] first amendment right to free speech.” United States v. Scott, 521 F.2d 1188, 1195 (9th Cir.1975) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 955 , 96 S.Ct. 1431 , 47 L.Ed.2d 361 (1976); see also Uni…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nancy Hicks
See, e.g., United States v. Van Scoy, 654 F.2d 257, 260-61 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 977 , 71 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gabrielson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
See, e.g., Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp., 80 F.R.D. 626, 658 (N.D.Cal.1978), aff' d, 645 F.2d 699 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gabrielson v. Montgomery Ward & Company
See, e.g., Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp., 80 F.R.D. 626, 658 (N.D.Cal.1978), aff'd, 645 F.2d 699 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981). 18 If neither Mr. Gabrielson nor the plaintiff were entitled to benefits under the Health Care Plan, it would be futile to permit amendment of the complaint because any claim could be defeated on a motion for summary judgment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wyman
See, e.g., United States v. Ness, 652 F.2d 890, 893 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 976 , 71 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); United States v. Farber, 630 F.2d 569, 572 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1127 , 101 S.Ct. 946 , 67 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981); United States v. Karsky, 610 F.2d 548, 550-51 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Howard
v.
Colorado
v.
Colorado
No. 81-887.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 14, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.