green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.6 score
“courts may validly ____ ______ protect their dockets from cases which arise within their jurisdiction, but which lack significant connection to it; may legitimately encourage trial of controversies in the ___ localities in which they arise”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Doe v. Hyland Therapeutics Division
See Piper, 454 U.S. at 255 -56 and n. 23, 102 S.Ct. at 265 -66 and n. 23 (finding reasonable the practice of giving less deference to a foreign plaintiff’s choice of forum); see also In re Union Carbide, 809 F.2d at 202 (little or no deference paid to plaintiffs’ choice of U.S. forum where most of the 200,000 plaintiffs were Indian citizens); But see Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 795-97 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981) (questioning the significance accorded to citizenship of parties in forum non conveniens inquiry).
discussed
Cited "but see"
ca9 1984
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see Williams v. United States District Court, 658 F.2d 430, 435 (6th Cir.) (adopting a three-prong test), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981). 74 In Gulf Oil, the Court emphasized its frustration with the state of the record when it noted that "[t]he record reveals no grounds on which the District Court could have determined that it was necessary or appropriate to impose this order," and that "one looks in vain for any indication of a careful weighing of competing factors." 452 U.S. at 102, 103 , 101 S.Ct. at 2200, 2201 (footnote omitted).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Domingo v. New England Fish Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see Williams v. United States District Court, 658 F.2d 430, 435 (6th Cir.) (adopting a three-prong test), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mercier v. Sheraton
courts may validly ____ ______ protect their dockets from cases which arise within their jurisdiction, but which lack significant connection to it; may legitimately encourage trial of controversies in the ___ localities in which they arise
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
George E. Mercier and Susan Y. Mercier v. Sheraton International, Inc., A/K/A Itt-Sheraton International, Inc.
courts may validly protect their dockets from cases which arise within their jurisdiction, but which lack significant connection to it; may legitimately encourage trial of controversies in the localities in which they arise
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lugones v. Sandals Resorts, Inc.
Defendant carries the burden to produce “enough information to enable the district court to balance the parties interest.” Piper Aircraft, 454 U.S. at 258, 102 S.Ct. at 267.
cited
Cited "see"
Richard Hale Austin v. State of Tennessee
See State v. Austin, 618 S.W.2d 738 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S. Ct. 980 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Austin
(2×)
See State v. Austin, 618 S.W.2d 738 (Tenn.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Richard Hale Austin
See State v. Austin, 618 S.W.2d 738 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S. Ct. 980 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Marra v. Papandreou
See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 780 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. den., 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981); see also Nodes v. S.N.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Price v. Wisconsin Services Corp.
See Cannon v. Univ. of Chicago, 648 F.2d 1104 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 981 , 71 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
See State v. Austin, 618 S.W.2d 738, 742 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981); State v. Dicks, 615 S.W.2d 126 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933 , 102 S.Ct. 431 , 70 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram, P.C. v. Hazard
See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 783 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981); 4 Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. Eastern Air Lines, 672 F.Supp. 525, 526 (D.D.C.1987); International Bhd. of Painters and Allied Trades Union v. Bes Painting and Sandblasting Co., 621 F.Supp. 906, 907 (D.D.C.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Rosenberger
See Id. (citing Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 795-98 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981)). [12] Ryder did not submit any affidavits in support of its motion.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dunham v. Hotelera Canco S.A. De C.V.
See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 790 (D.C.Cir.1980) (inability of a party to implead another party directly involved in the controversy is a factor which favors dismissal under forum non conveniens), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981); Hodson, supra, at 822.
cited
Cited "see"
Tennecal Funding Corporation Tennecal Capital Resources, Inc. v. The Sakura Bank
See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 798 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 (1981); Del Monte Corp. v. Everett Steamship Corp., 402 F.Supp. 237, 243 (N.D.Cal.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hyatt Corp. v. Howarth
See generally Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775 (D.C.Cir.1980) (case transferred when plaintiff was not citizen of forum), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981); Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 780 F.Supp. 1467 (S.D.Tex.1992), aff'd, 990 F.2d 1489 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994) (same). "`In sum, this is a [Monroe County] case,' which belongs in [Monroe County]." See Della-Donna v. Gore Newspaper Co., 390 So.2d 87, 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (quoting Leinberger v. Webster, 66 F.R.D. 28, 35 (E.D.N.Y.19…
cited
Cited "see"
Kinney System, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co.
See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
The Roots Partnership v. Lands' End, Inc.
See Cannon v. Univ. of Chicago, 648 F.2d 1104, 1110 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 981 , 71 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Roots Partnership v. Lands' End, Inc.
See Cannon v. Univ. of Chicago, 648 F.2d 1104, 1110 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 981 , 71 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Dowling v. Hyland Therapeutics Division, Travenol Laboratories, Inc.
See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 790 (D.C.Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
AmeriFirst Bank v. Bomar
See In re “Agent Orange” Products Liability Litigation, 635 F.2d 987, 993 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied sub nom, Chapman v. Dow Chemical Co., 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trivelloni-Lorenzi v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 783 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981); Alcoa Steamship Co., Inc. v. M/V NORDIC REGENT, 654 F.2d 147, 154-58 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 890 , 101 S.Ct. 248 , 66 L.Ed.2d 116 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
ca5 1987
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 783 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981); Alcoa Steamship Co., Inc. v. M/V NORDIC REGENT, 654 F.2d 147, 154-58 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 890 , 101 S.Ct. 248 , 66 L.Ed.2d 116 (1980) 25 We recognize that in Jones Act and general maritime cases we have in the past utilized a modified analysis on forum non conveniens issues.
cited
Cited "see"
Jennings v. Boeing Co.
See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 797 (D.C.Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981). 11 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Harbison
See State v. Austin, 618 S.W.2d 738, 741 (Tenn. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 ; Houston v. State, 593 S.W.2d 267 (Tenn.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Group Health Inc. v. Blue Cross Ass'n
See generally In re “Agent Orange’’ Product Liability Litigation, 506 F.Supp. 762, 792-94 (E.D.N.Y.), rev’d on other grounds, 635 F.2d 987 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Tramp Oil and Marine, Ltd. v. M/v Mermaid I, Etc.
See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 784 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981); La Seguridad v. Transytur Line, 707 F.2d 1304, 1307 (11th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee
See Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775 , 788 n. 67 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981); Graco, Inc. v. Kremlin, Inc., 101 F.R.D. 503 , 508 n. 4 (N.D.Ill.1984). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re the Cadillac V8-6-4 Class Action
See, e.g., In re Agent Orange, 506 F.Supp. 762, 790 (E.D.N.Y.), rev’d in part for lack of federal question jurisdiction, 635 F.2d 987 (2d Cir.1980), cert. den., 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981) (holding certifiable class of Vietnam veterans and their families suing companies that manufactured chemical claimed to cause serious physical injury); Payton v. Abbott Labs, supra (certifying class of women exposed in útero to DES); Sanchez v. Lowell Lebermann, Inc., 79 F.R.D. 21, 24 (W.D.Tex.1978) (allowing class action under Truth-in-Lending Act despite requirement that plaint…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Franks Ex Rel. H.B.L. v. Kentucky School for the Deaf
See e.g., Cannon v. University of Chicago, 648 F.2d 1104 (7th Cir.1981) cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 981 , 71 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981) (medical school applicant case); Nagel v. Avon Board of Education, 575 F.Supp. 105 (D.Conn.1983) (school appointment of chairpersons case).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perniciaro v. Natale (In Re Natale)
Moore, supra, at 12-68; see, e.g., Cannon v. University of Chicago, 648 F.2d 1104, 1109-10 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 981 , 71 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1013 , 103 S.Ct. 1254 , 75 L.Ed.2d 482 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Gold Corp. v. Federal Express Corp.
See, e.g., Ruston Gas Turbines, Inc., v. Pan American World Airways, 757 F.2d 29, 30 (2d Cir.1985) (“Deregulation of certain common carriers returns us to the common law.”) A balancing of the state and federal interests affected, see In re “Agent Orange” Liability Litigation, 635 F.2d 987, 990-95 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981), further indicates that application of federal law is proper.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chhawchharia v. Boeing Co.
See also Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 791-92 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Fiedler v. Clark, 714 F.2d 77, 79 (9th Cir.1983) (holding there to be no private right of action under FIFRA); see also In Re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 635 F.2d 987 , 991 n. 9 (2nd Cir.1980) (affirming district court determination that there is no private right of action under FIFRA), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Yip v. Pagano
See also In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 635 F.2d 987, 994-95 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation, 635 F.2d 987, 993 (2d Cir.1980) (no federal policy at stake in action by war veterans against manufacturers of defoliants used in Vietnam War that is sufficient to warrant creation of federal common law), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981); cf. Miree v. DeKalb County, 433 U.S. 25, 29-32 , 97 S.Ct. 2490, 2493-97 , 53 L.Ed.2d 557 (1977) (federal interest in air travel insufficient basis for creation of federal law in action between private parties that will have no direct effect on United States or its…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bynum v. General Motors Corp.
See, e.g., In re “Agent Orange” Product Liability Litigation, 506 F.Supp. 737 (E.D.N.Y.1979), rev’d. on other grounds, 635 F.2d 987 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Victoria A. Lehman, as of the Estate of Robert Wayne Lehman, Deceased v. Humphrey Cayman, Ltd. And Holiday Inns, Inc.
See also Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981), in which the court held: Thus, the plaintiff’s choice of forum is more than just one factor that the trial judge must consider when balancing equities between two alternative forums.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nebenzahl v. Credit Suisse
See, e.g., Pain v. United Technologies Corp., 637 F.2d 775, 784-85 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1128 , 102 S.Ct. 980 , 71 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981).
Pain, Personal Representative of the Estate of Pain
v.
United Technologies Corp.
v.
United Technologies Corp.
No. 80-1592.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 14, 1981.
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.