green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1996 ·
…farris makes co-extensive the tests for application of state law to indian reservations under 1955 and for direct application of state law under public law 280.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. E.C. Investments, Inc.
farris makes co-extensive the tests for application of state law to indian reservations under 1955 and for direct application of state law under public law 280.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1258, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2135 United States of America v. E.C. Investments, Inc., AKA Great Western Casino, Inc. William C. Armstrong Ira Englander Gyorgy Hargitai Roger Keesee
farris makes co-extensive the tests for application of state law to indian reservations under 1955 and for direct application of state law under public law 280.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ed J. Hagen, Also Known as J. Ewald Martha Jo \Marjo\" Hagen and William C. Hagen
See Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians v. Duffy, 694 F.2d 1185, 1189 (9th Cir.1982) (California bingo law “regulatory”), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 929 , 103 S.Ct. 2091 , 77 L.Ed.2d 301 (1983); Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310, 314-15 (5th Cir.1981) (Florida bingo statute “regulatory”), cert. denied, *264 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982); see also Iowa Tribe of Indians v. Kansas, 787 F.2d 1434 , 1435 n. 1 (10th Cir.1986) (acknowledging but not applying prohibitory/regulatory distinction).
discussed
Cited "see"
Iowa Tribe of Indians of Kansas and Nebraska, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe v. State of Kansas
See Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians v. Duffy, 694 F.2d 1185 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 929 , 103 S.Ct. 2091 , 77 L.Ed.2d 301 (1983); Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982); United States v. Marcyes, 557 F.2d 1361 (9th Cir.1977); Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wis *1436 consin v. State of Wisconsin, 518 F.Supp. 712 (W.D.Wisc.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tramp Oil and Marine, Ltd. v. M/v Mermaid I, Etc.
See Gulf Trading & Transportation Co. v. M/V Tento, 694 F.2d 1191 (9th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 929 , 103 S.Ct. 2091 , 77 L.Ed.2d 301 (1983); Gulf Trading & Transportation Co. v. Vessel Hoegh Shield, 658 F.2d 363 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119 , 102 S.Ct. 2932 , 73 L.Ed. 1332 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe v. State of Ariz.
See, e.g., Barona Group of Capiton Grande Band of Mission Indians v. Duffy, 694 F.2d 1185 (9th Cir.1982) (applying the test to OCCA cases), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 929 , 103 S.Ct. 2091 , 77 L.Ed.2d 301 (1983); United States v. Marcyes, 557 F.2d 1361 (1977) (applying the test to the Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 13 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America State of Michigan, United States of America v. Frederick Dakota Sybil Dakota the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community
See, e.g., Barona Group v. Duffy, 694 F.2d 1185 , 1187-88 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 929 , 103 S.Ct. 2091 , 77 L.Ed.2d 301 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moapa Band of Paiute Indians, a Chartered Indian Tribe v. United States Department of Interior, an Agency of the Government of the United States
Compare Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians v. Duffy, 694 F.2d 1185 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 929 , 103 S.Ct. 2091 , 77 L.Ed.2d 301 (1983) (state law regulates bingo, so bingo not forbidden to Indians by ACA) and Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982) (same) with Marcyes, 557 F.2d at 1364 (although state law allows limited use of fireworks it is essentially prohibitory and so applies to Indian reservation via ACA) and United States v. Farris, 624 F.2d 890 (9th Cir.1980)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Penobscot Nation v. Stilphen
See, e.g., Barona Group of Captain Grande Band of Mission Indians v. Duffy, 694 F.2d 1185 (9th Cir.1982), petition for cert. filed, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2091 , 77 L.Ed.2d 301 (1983); Oneida Tribe of Indians v. State of Wisconsin, 518 F.Supp. 712 (W.D.Wis.1981); Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth, 491 F.Supp. 1015 (S.D.Fla.1980), aff’d, 658 F.2d 310 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kondrat
v.
City of Willoughby Hills
v.
City of Willoughby Hills
No. 82-1559.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1983.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
Ct. App. Ohio, Lake County. Certiorári denied.