green
Positive treatment
9.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Free v. Abbott Laboratories
(2×)
Cf. Moses Cone, 460 U.S. at 23-24, 103 S.Ct. at 941 (disfavoring abstention where federal question controls).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Abbott Laboratories
(2×)
Cf. Moses Cone, 460 U.S. at 23-24, 103 S.Ct. at 941 (disfavoring abstention where federal question controls).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Waugh
See United States v. Taylor, 683 F.2d 18, 21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 459 U.S. 945 (1982) (holding “the complex nature of the operation” is indicative of intent to distribute).
discussed
Cited "see"
Karofsky v. Abbott Laboratories
(2×)
See Goldberg v. CPC Int'l Inc., 678 F.2d 1365 , 1367 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 259 , 74 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982); see also Spellman v. Meridian Bank, -F.3d-,-, 1995 WL 764548 , at *9 (3d Cir. Dec. 29, 1995). 2 The plaintiffs did not seek a specific dollar recovery for damages or attorney fees in their complaint.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilmer v. Walt Disney Co.
(2×)
See Goldberg v. CPC Int'l Inc., 678 F.2d 1365 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 259 , 74 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982); Gilman v. Wheat, First Securities, Inc., 896 F.Supp. 507, 511 (D.Md.1995); Copeland v. MBNA America, N.A., 820 F.Supp. 537 (D.Colo.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spellman v. Meridian Bank
See Goldberg v. Int'l, Inc., 678 F.2d 1365 , 1367 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 (1982); but re Abbott Laboratories, 51 F.3d 524 , 526-27 (5th Cir. 1995) (allocating attorneys' class representative under Louisiana class action fee recovery statute).
cited
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Tansley
See United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 793 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Garrett A. Tansley, A/K/A Jerry Tansley and Douglas Raymond Cox, A/K/A Doug Kelly
See United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 793 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mayo v. Key Financial Services Inc.
(2×)
See Goldberg v. CPC Int'l, Inc., 678 F.2d 1365 , 1367 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 259 , 74 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982); National Org. for Women v. Mutual of Omaha Ins., 612 F.Supp. 100, 108 (D.D.C.1985).
examined
Cited "see"
Port Terminal RR Ass'n v. Richardson
(4×)
See Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 628 S.W.2d 171, 174 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1982, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 259 , 74 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arloha Mae Pinto, United States of America v. Marcel Samuel Lambert
See United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 784 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ira Paul Citron
See United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776 , 778 n. 2 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); United States v. Gay, 567 F.2d 1206 (2d Cir.1978); United States v. Bianco, 534 F.2d 501 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822 , 97 S.Ct. 73 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); United States v. Fisher, 518 F.2d 836 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1033 , 96 S.Ct. 565 , 46 L.Ed.2d 407 (1975); Taglianetti v. United States, 398 F.2d 558, 562 (1st Cir.1968), aff'd, 394 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 1099 , 22 L.Ed.2d 302 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gray Drugfair, Inc. v. Heller
(2×)
Accord, e.g., Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobile Oil Corp., 628 S.W.2d 171 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (applying state law after remand required by post- Liepelt decision in Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobile Oil Corp., 453 U.S. 473 , 101 S.Ct. 2870 , 69 L.Ed.2d 784 (1981)), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 259 , 74 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982); Yukon Equipment, Inc. v. Gordon, 660 P.2d 428, 433 (Alaska 1983); Irwin v. Pacific Southwest Airlines, 133 Cal. App.3d 709 , 184 Cal. Rptr. 228 (1982); Griffin v. General Motors Corp., 380 Mass. 362 , 403 N.E.2d 402 (1980). *1160 We also reject the plaintiff's contention that …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Oxman, United States of America v. William H. Pflaumer
(2×)
See United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 790-91 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); App. at 1665-66.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William H. Pflaumer
(2×)
See United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 790-91 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); App. at 1665-66.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Nixon Rush, Larry Joseph Lancelotti, Gregory Lee Lancelotti, Harry J. Shnurman, Robert Michael Cohen, Thomas G. Converse, David Earl Johnson, Irving F. Imoberstag, Carl Eric Olsen, Jacob Shnurman, Randall Collins, Jeffrey Allen Brown, and David Nissenbaum, United States of America v. Michael Lee Risolvato, United States of America v. Charles Leaton
Whether such an inference may be drawn depends upon the surrounding circumstances, including the nature of the relationship (whether it is commercial rather than personal), the quantity of the drug (whether it is too large for personal use only), the number of people involved, and statements or conduct on the part of the defendants. 60 Id. at 450 ; see United States v. Taylor, 683 F.2d 18, 21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 261 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982) (Swiderski inapplicable to complex operation, a large quantity of marijuana); United States v. Wright, 593 F.2d 105, 108 (9th…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rush
Id. at 450; see United States v. Taylor, 683 F.2d 18, 21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 261 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982) [Swiderski inapplicable to complex operation, a large quantity of marijuana); United States v. Wright, 593 F.2d 105, 108 (9th Cir.1979) [Swiderski not applicable where drug not simultaneously and jointly acquired).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ohle
See, e.g., United States v. Dale, 991 F.2d 819, 849 (D.C.Cir.1993) (rejecting Henderson in prosecution for wire fraud and federal tax evasion); United States v. Computer Sciences Corp., 689 F.2d 1181 , 1187 n. 13 (4th Cir.1982) (rejecting Henderson in prosecution for mail and wire fraud and making false claims to the government), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 953 (1983), overruled in nonrelevant part by Busby v. Crown Supply, Inc., 896 F.2d 833, 841 (4th Cir.1990); United States v. Shermetaro, 625 F.2d 104, 110-11 (6th Cir.1980) (rejecting Henderson in prosecution fo…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Raboin
DVDs as Movie Production and Indication of Internet Dissemination “What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home ... is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection." Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351 (1967); see also United States v. Taylor, 683 F.2d 18, 21 (1st Cir. 1982) (holding that defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in film roll depicting illegal activity that he brought to a commercial establishment for development), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Enrique Reinaldo Rivera and Samuel Aponte-Vega
See Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171, 175 , 107 S.Ct. 2775, 2778-79 , 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987); United States v. Tracy, 12 F.3d 1186, 1196 (2d Cir.1993); see also United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 786 (2d Cir.) (declarations of one member of a conspiracy are admissible against another member “only if made ‘during the course of and in furtherance of the conspiracy”’ (quoting Rule)), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Matos-Peralta
It is “well-settled that declarations that are otherwise hearsay may nonetheless be provisionally admitted pursuant to Rule 801(d)(2)(E)____” United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108, 136 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 , 103 S.Ct. 1891 , 77 L.Ed.2d 282 (1983); see, e.g., United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 787-89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Persico
The Second Circuit has stated that “[t]he law is well-settled that declarations that are otherwise hearsay may nonetheless be provisionally admitted pursuant to Rule 801(d)(2)(E)____” United States v. Margiotta, 688 F.2d 108, 136 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 , 103 S.Ct. 1891 , 77 L.Ed.2d 282 (1983); see e.g., United States v. Mastropieri, 685 F.2d 776, 786-90 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 260 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); United States v. Cambindo-Valenda, 609 F.2d 603, 630 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Sawyer
See also Brown, petitioner, 370 Mass. 267, 269-271 (1976). 9 For the same reason, United States v. Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48 (1951), and United States v. Taylor, 683 F.2d 18 (1st Cir), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 (1982), also relied upon by the defendant, are inapposite. 10 We are mindful that, once the Governor of the asylum State had acted on a requisition for extradition based upon the demanding State’s judicial determination of probable cause, an independent judicial inquiry in the asylum State on the issue would be prohibited by art. 4, § 2, of the United States Constitution.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CPC International, Inc.
v.
Goldberg
v.
Goldberg
No. 82-348.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1982.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.