green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis Raul Rivera-Gomez
See United States v. Chamorro, 687 F.2d 1, 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 462 , 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maria Enriqueta Cirila Trinidad De Jongh
We have regularly held that motions for mistrial are “directed primarily to the sound discretion of the trial court.” Real v. Hogan, 828 F.2d 58, 61 (1st Cir.1987); accord United States v. Chamorro, 687 F.2d 1, 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 462 , 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982); United States v. Pappas, 611 F.2d 399, 406 (1st Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Irwin Gwin v. Wayne Snow, Jr., Robert I. Gwin v. Mobley Howell
See Slocum v. Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles, 678 F.2d 940, 942 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 462 , 74 L.Ed.2d 612 (1982) (parole board’s refusal to allow inmate to examine his file does not constitute a constitutional violation).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edgardo Giorgi, United States of America v. Gilberto Ocasio-Gonzalez, United States of America v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez
See United States v. Chamorro, 687 F.2d 1, 6 (1st Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 462 , 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Roosevelt Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of Parole
See Brandon, 631 F.Supp. at 440 (citing Slocum v. Georgia State Bd. of Pardons & Paroles, 678 F.2d 940 , 942 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 462 , 74 L.Ed.2d 612 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary S. Mayes v. Nevin C. Trammell, Chairman, Board of Pardons & Paroles, and Members of the Tennessee Parole Board
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Slocum v. Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles, 678 F.2d 940, 942 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 462 , 74 L.Ed.2d 612 (1982); Schuemann v. Colorado State Board of Adult Parole, 624 F.2d 172, 175 (10th Cir.1980); Jackson v. Reese, 608 F.2d 159, 160 (5th Cir.1979); Cook v. Whiteside, 505 F.2d 32, 34 (5th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wilmot
See United States v. Chamorro, 687 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 462 , 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982); United States v. Hinckley, 672 F.2d 115 (D.C.Cir.1982); Olson v. Klecker, 642 F.2d 1115 (8th Cir.1981); United States v. Lilly, 576 F.2d 1240 (5th Cir.1978) reh. denied, 599 F.2d 619 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. Stumes, 549 F.2d 831 (8th Cir.1977); Bonner v. Coughlin, 517 F.2d 1311 (7th Cir.1975), modified in part on other grounds, 545 F.2d 565 (7th Cir.1976); United States v. Savage, 482 F.2d 1371 (9th Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Geas v. DuBois
Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 558 , 99 S.Ct. 1861, 1884 , 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979); see also United States v. Chamorro, 687 F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.), cert. den., 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 462 , 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982). 8 Courts should accord broad deference to prison administrators when reviewing the reasonableness of policies designed to preserve internal order, security, and discipline.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Karen Bonitz v. Michael v. Fair, Karen Bonitz v. Michael v. Fair, Appeal of William Shaughnessy
(2×)
See also United States v. Chamorro, 687 F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.) ("The courts are generally in accord that what remains of fourth amendment protection behind prison gates is the prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures.") (citing Bonner, Lilly, United States v. Savage, 482 F.2d 1371, 1372 (9th Cir.1973) ("prisoner is entitled to fourth amendment's protection from unreasonable searches and seizures")), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 462 , 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982). 23 In addition, the local district court had determined that an inmate had stated a cause of action under Sec. 1983 for a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parker v. Corrothers
Compare Slocum v. Georgia State Board of Pardons & Paroles, 678 F.2d 940 , 941 n. 3 (11th Cir.) (Greenholtz makes "shall/unless” formulation decisive), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 462 , 74 L.Ed.2d 612 (1982) and Boothe v. Hammock, 605 F.2d 661, 663-64 (2d Cir.1979) (same) with Winsett v. McGinnes, 617 F.2d 996, 1007 (3d Cir. 1980) (liberty interest arises when discretionary decisions must be exercised consistently with a specific statutory criterion), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cole v. Snow
See also United States v. Chamorro, 687 F.2d 1, 2 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043 , 103 S.Ct. 462 , 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Slocum
v.
Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles
v.
Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles
No. 82-5518.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 1982.
Cited by 27 opinions | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.