green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Kelly
(4×)
See United States v. Hill, 688 F.2d 18 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1074 , 103 S.Ct. 498 , 74 L.Ed.2d 638 (1982) (both jurors exposed to extraneous materials were dismissed from the jury prior to deliberations and the materials were immediately removed from the jury room; therefore, defendant suffered no prejudice); State v. Rodgers, 7 Ariz.App. 29 , 435 P.2d 864 (1967), vacated on other grounds, 103 Ariz. 393 , 442 P.2d 840 (1968) (affirming trial court where although the juror committed misconduct by reading a book on criminal instructions during a recess, the trial court carefully wen…
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. John Bruce Hubbard
(4×)
See United States v. Hill, 688 F.2d 18 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1074 , 103 S.Ct. 498 , 74 L.Ed.2d 638 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scott E. Smith
(2×)
See United States v. Wunder, 919 F.2d 34, 37 (6th Cir.1990) (citing United States v. Hill, 688 F.2d 18, 21 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1074 , 103 S.Ct. 498 , 74 L.Ed.2d 638 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hamilton
(2×)
Accord United States v. Hill, 688 F.2d 18, 20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1074 , 103 S.Ct. 498 , *127 74 L.Ed.2d 638 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sergio Balderas (93-1201) and Raul Balderas Segura (93-1202)
See also United States v. Hill, 688 F.2d 18, 20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1074 , 103 S.Ct. 498 (1982) (defendant must show actual prejudice resulting from jury's exposure to extrinsic material to justify a new trial).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ira Silverman (90-3205) Morris G. Woodard (90-5816) and Gary Caton (90-5733/91-6506)
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Hill, 688 F.2d 18, 20 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1074 , 103 S.Ct. 498 , 74 L.Ed.2d 638 (1982) (sentencing court may consider presentence report information "notwithstanding the fact that [defendant] has never been prosecuted or convicted for any prior criminal activity"), Humphries v. Green, 397 F.2d 67, 70 (6th Cir.1968). 46 The sentencing court's use of hearsay information has traditionally been almost unlimited.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hegwood
v.
Martin, Warden
v.
Martin, Warden
No. 82-5662.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 6, 1982.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.