green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.9 score
“the judge has broad discretion in the conduct of the voir dire, subject to the essential demands of fairness that require that prejudice would be discovered if present”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Kureshy v. City University of New York
Lieberman, 630 F.2d at 64 ; but see Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337, 1344 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Dale E. Birdsell
the judge has broad discretion in the conduct of the voir dire, subject to the essential demands of fairness that require that prejudice would be discovered if present
discussed
Cited "see"
Potera-Haskins v. Gamble
See Jones v. Los Angeles Community College Dist., 702 F.2d 203, 205 (9th Cir.1983) (citing Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337, 1340-41 (9th Cir.1981) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Julia Prewitt Brown v. Trustees of Boston University
(2×)
See Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337 , 1343 & n. 5 (9th Cir.1981) ("A disdain for women's issues, and a diminished opinion of those [including men] who concentrate on those issues, is evidence of a discriminatory attitude towards women."), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ann B. Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse. Ann B. Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse
(2×)
See Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337 , 1343 n. 5 (9th Cir.1981) (“when plaintiffs establish that decisions regarding ... employment are motivated by discriminatory attitudes relating to race or sex, or are rooted in concepts which reflect such attitudes, however subtly, courts are obligated to afford the relief provided by Title VII”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Annie Laura KIMBROUGH, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. SECRETARY OF the UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Defendant/Appellant
(2×)
Accord Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wellington Mitchell v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce
See Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337 , 1344-45 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982); Davis v. Weidner, 596 F.2d 726 , 730 (7th Cir.1979); see also Davis v. Califano, 613 F.2d 957, 964-65 (D.C.Cir. 1980).
cited
Cited "see"
34 Fair empl.prac.cas. 881, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,306 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Inland Marine Industries, Fletcher L. Houston v. Inland Marine Industries Rudy Sutton Douglas Sutton Stanley Sutton and Does I Through Xxx
See Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337 , 1343 n. 5 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Inland Marine Industries
See Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337 , 1343 n. 5 (9th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1554, 31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 972, 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,537 Vincent J. Limongelli, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Postmaster General of the United States, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellant
See Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337, 1344 (9th Cir.1981) (objective job qualifications are best considered as part of plaintiff's prima facie case), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Limongelli v. Postmaster General
See Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337, 1344 (9th Cir.1981) (objective job qualifications are best considered as part of plaintiff’s prima facie case), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mitchell v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
See, e.g., Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337, 1342-43 (9th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982); Kinsey v. First Regional Securities, Inc., 557 F.2d 830, 839 (D.C.Cir.1977); Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp., 522 F.2d 333, 344-45 (10th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coggeshall v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Apodaca, 666 F.2d 89, 97 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 58 (1982); United States v. Martinez, 616 F.2d 185, 187 (5th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 450 U.S. 994 , 101 S.Ct. 1694 , 68 L.Ed.2d 193 (1981); United States v. Steinkoenig, 487 F.2d 225, 229 (5th Cir.1973); Vaccaro v. United States, 461 F.2d 626, 634-36 (5th Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald A. VINING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marvin T. RUNYON, Jr., Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee
This Court has recognized that “[o]ur adversarial legal system generally does not tolerate ex parte determinations on the merits of a civil case.” Application of Eisenberg, 654 F.2d 1107, 1112 (5th Cir. Unit B Sept. 1981). 3 The right to due process “encompasses the individual’s right to be aware of and refute the evidence against the merits of his case.” Id.; see also Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337, 1346 (9th Cir.1981) (holding that in camera review of tenure file for purpose of assisting factual determination in Title VII action violates due process)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Douglas
In support of his claims, Defendant presented evidence that the African-American population in the Fort Worth division is approximately 10.4103 percent. 4 That figure, which represents the percentage of African-Americans in the gross population of the division, is irrelevant for Sixth Amendment purposes, however, as the pertinent community for a fair cross section analysis is the pool of African-Americans in the division “who are eligible to serve as jurors.” United States v. Brummitt, 665 F.2d 521, 529 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977 , 102 S.Ct. 2244 , 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982); se…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Love v. United States
See, eg., State of Idaho v. United States Dept. of the Army, 666 F.2d 444 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 58 (1983); Ayala v. United States, 550 F.2d 1196 (9th Cir.1977); contra, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Otero, 598 F.2d 627 (1st Cir.1979); Leather's Best v. Mormaclynx, 451 F.2d 800 (2nd Cir.1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marion Namenwirth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
(2×)
See, e.g., Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337, 1343 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Margaret Spaulding, and James Bush, Intervenors-Appellants v. University of Washington
(2×)
See, e.g., Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982) (Lynn ). 33 In attempting to meet its burden, the nursing faculty contends that nursing faculty members perform substantially equal work to that performed by specified comparator faculty members because both jobs require preparation and teaching of courses, research and publication, committee work, advising of students, and community service.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Langland v. Vanderbilt University
Compare Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337, 1344 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982) with Lieberman, 630 F.2d 60 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Minority Employees at Nasa (Mean), Diane A. Moore v. James M. Beggs, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Minority Employees at Nasa (Mean), Gloria Taliaferro v. James M. Beggs, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Minority Employees at Nasa (Mean), Rose Mary Ferguson v. James M. Beggs, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
See, e.g., Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337, 1342-43 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982); Kinsey v. First Regional Securities, Inc., 557 F.2d 830, 839 (D.C.Cir.1977); Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp., 522 F.2d 333, 344-45 (10th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Minority Employees at Nasa v. Beggs
See, eg., Lynn v. Regents of the University of California, 656 F.2d 1337, 1342-43 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 59 (1982); Kinsey v. First Regional Securities, Inc., 557 F.2d 830, 839 (D.C.Cir.1977); Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp., 522 F.2d 333, 344-45 (10th Cir.1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bramson
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-1965.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.