Champion Prods. Inc. v. Univ. of Pittsburgh, 459 U.S. 1087 (1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Champion Prods. Inc. v. Univ. of Pittsburgh, 459 U.S. 1087 (1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
87 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 30 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Big O Tires, Inc. v. BIGFOOT 4× 4, INC. (cod, 2001-09-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Big O Tires, Inc. v. BIGFOOT 4× 4, INC.
D. Colo. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brunswick Corp. v. Spinit Reel Co., 832 F.2d 513, 523 (10th Cir.1987) (citing University of Pittsburgh v. Champion Prods., Inc., 686 F.2d 1040, 1044 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982)). “[W]hile laches may not be sufficient to bar a permanent injunction it may well be a bar to preliminary relief.
cited Cited "see" Goldson v. Carver Boat Corp.
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See University of Pittsburgh v. Champion Products, Inc., 686 F.2d 1040, 1044 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Britton v. Maloney
D. Mass. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Coffran v. Hitchcock Clinic, Inc., 683 F.2d 5, 7 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982) (citing test as whether the verdict is against “the clear weight of the evidence”); Borras v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., 586 F.2d 881, 887 (1st Cir.1978) (citing test as whether the verdict is against “the great weight of the evidence”).
discussed Cited "see" Creative Computer Visions, Inc. v. Laser Learning Technologies, Inc.
S.D.W. Va · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
Moreover, in consideration of the public interest, estoppel by laches may not be invoked to deny injunc-tive relief if it is apparent that the infringing use is likely to cause confusion. 4 McCarthy at § 31.04[1]; see University of Pittsburgh v. Champion Products, Inc., 686 F.2d 1040, 1044 (3d Cir.)(“Because laches is an equitable doctrine, its application is inextricably bound up with the nature and quality of the plaintiffs claim on the merits relevant to a prospective injunction.”), cer t. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982).
cited Cited "see" CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND v. McCORMICK DRAY LINE, INC.
3rd Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See University of Pittsburgh v. Champion Products, Inc., 686 F.2d 1040, 1044 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982).
cited Cited "see" Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund v. McCormick Dray Line, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See University of Pittsburgh v. Champion Products, Inc., 686 F.2d 1040, 1044 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Sara Lee Corporation v. Kayser-Roth Corporation (2×)
4th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
Moreover, in consideration of the public interest, estoppel by lach-es may not be invoked to deny injunctive relief if it is apparent that the infringing use is likely to cause confusion. 4 McCarthy at § 31.04[1]; see University of Pittsburgh v. Champion Products, Inc., 686 F.2d 1040, 1044 (3d Cir.) (“Because laches is an equitable doctrine, its application is inextricably bound up with the nature and quality of the plaintiffs claim on the merits relevant to a prospective injunction.”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Fleet National Bank v. Anchor Media Television, Inc.
1st Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fleet Nat’l Bank, 831 F.Supp. at 32 (citing Coffran v. Hitchcock Clinic, Inc., 683 F.2d 5, 6 (1st Cir.) (trial judge may not set aside jury verdict merely because s/he would have reached a different conclusion than the jury), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982), and Borras v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 586 F.2d 881, 886 (1st Cir.1978) (trial court may set aside jury verdict only where verdict (1) is against clear weight of evidence; (2) is based upon evidence which is false; or (3) will result in a miscarriage of justice)).
cited Cited "see" Jose L. Sanchez v. Puerto Rico Oil Company
1st Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Coffran v. Hitchock Clinic, Inc., 683 F.2d 5, 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Inter-City Gas Corporation, a Manitoba Corporation v. Boise Cascade Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Inter-City Gas Corporation, a Manitoba Corporation v. Boise Cascade Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
8th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
In accordance with that policy, judicial review of arbitration awards is restricted, see Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 751 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986), and the courts will not review the merits of those awards, Coast Trading Co. v. Pacific Molasses Co., 681 F.2d 1195, 1198 (9th Cir.1982); see United Food & Commercial Workers, Local No. 222 v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 683 F.2d 283, 285 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1088 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982) (labor arbitration); see also 9 U.S.C.
cited Cited "see" Ocean State Physicians Health Plan, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
D.R.I. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Coffran v. Hitchcock Clinic, Inc., 683 F.2d 5, 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982).
discussed Cited "see" Inter-City Gas Corp. v. Boise Cascade Corp.
8th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
In accordance with that policy, judicial review of arbitration awards is restricted, see Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 751 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986), and the courts will not review the merits of those awards, Coast Trading Co. v. Pacific Molasses Co., 681 F.2d 1195, 1198 (9th Cir.1982); see United Food & Commercial Workers, Local No. 222 v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 683 F.2d 283, 285 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1088 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982) (labor arbitration); see also 9 U.S.C. § 10 .
cited Cited "see" Sandra Conway v. Electro Switch Corp., Sandra Conway v. Electro Switch Corp.
1st Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Coffran v. Hitchcock Clinic, Inc., 683 F.2d 5, 6 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1983); Hubbard, 626 F.2d at 200 ; Borras, 586 F.2d at 887 .
discussed Cited "see" Ambrit, Inc., F/k/a the Isaly Company, Inc., Cross v. Kraft, Inc., Cross-Appellee
11th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See University of Pittsburgh v. Champion Products, Inc., 686 F.2d 1040, 1044-45 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982); Conagra, Inc., 743 F.2d at 1517 n. 15. 75 .
discussed Cited "see" Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc.
11th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See University of Pittsburgh v. Champion Products, Inc., 686 F.2d 1040, 1044-45 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982); Conagra, Inc., 743 F.2d at 1517 n. 15. .
cited Cited "see" Ry. Labor Executives'ass'n v. Southeastern Pa. Tr.
Regl. Rail Reorg. Act · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See 103 S.Ct. 571 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ray Communications, Inc. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
As we stated in Sara Lee, “in consideration of the public interest, estoppel by laches may not be invoked to deny injunctive relief if it is apparent that the infringing use is likely to cause confusion.” 81 F.3d at 461 (citing 4 McCarthy § 31.04[1]); see also Univ. of Pittsburgh v. Champion Prods., Inc., 686 F.2d 1040, 1044 (3d Cir.) (“Because laches is an equitable doctrine, its application is inextricably bound up with the nature and quality of the plaintiffs claim on the merits relative to a prospective injunction.”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1…
cited Cited "see, e.g." New York Racing Assn., Inc. v. Stroup News Agency Corp.
N.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also University of Pittsburgh v. Champion Prods., Inc., 686 F.2d 1040, 1049 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Agapita Rosa Velazquez v. Edna J. Figueroa-Gomez, (Two Cases). Agapita Rosa Velazquez v. Edna J. Figueroa
1st Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
On the contrary, a trial judge may grant a new trial only if she “believes that the outcome is against the clear weight of the evidence such that upholding the verdict will result in a miscarriage of justice.” Conway, 825 F.2d at 598-99 ; see also Coffran v. Hitchcock Clinic, Inc., 683 F.2d 5, 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Conagra, Inc., a Corporation v. Robert C. Singleton, an Individual, D/B/A Singleton Shrimp Boats, Singleton Shrimp Boats, Inc., a Corporation
11th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, University of Pittsburgh v. Champion Products, Inc., 686 F.2d 1040, 1045 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1087 , 103 S.Ct. 571 , 74 L.Ed.2d 933 (1982); PGA v. Bankers’ Life Casualty Co., 514 F.2d 665, 670 (5th Cir.1975) (once licensee s right to use the mark is terminated, any subsequent use constitutes infringement).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Champion Products Inc.
v.
University of Pittsburgh
No. 82-699.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 13, 1982.
459 U.S. 1087
Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.