Stouffer Corp. v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 104 S. Ct. 151 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Stouffer Corp. v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 104 S. Ct. 151 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
84 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz (cand, 1985-10-29) · Strongest negative: Elling O. Eide v. Sarasota County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida (ca11, 1990-03-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Elling O. Eide v. Sarasota County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida
11th Cir. · 1990 · signal: but see · confidence high
Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449, 1454 (9th Cir.1987) (citing Williamson County, 105 S.Ct. at 3117 and MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County, 477 U.S. 340 , 106 S.Ct. 2561 , 2568 n. 8, 91 L.Ed.2d 285 , reh’g denied, 478 U.S. 1035 , 107 S.Ct. 22 , 92 L.Ed.2d 773 (1986), the court held “at least one application must be submitted before the futility exception applies.” (emphasis in original)); see Austin v. City and County of Honolulu, 840 F.2d 678, 680 (9th Cir.1988) (citing Williamson County and Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo, 830 F.2d 977 (9th Cir.1…
discussed Cited "see" Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz
N.D. Cal. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water District, 703 F.2d 1141 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 847 , 104 S.Ct. 151 , 78 L.Ed.2d 141 (1983); Hamilton Bank v. Williamson City Regional Planning Comm., 729 F.2d 402, 407 (6th Cir.1984), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 80 , 83 L.Ed.2d 28 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" David N. Sederquist and Marilyn T. Sederquist v. City of Tiburon, a Municipal Corporation (2×)
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
Agins v. City of Tiburon, 447 U.S. 255, 260 , 100 S.Ct. 2138, 2141 , 65 L.Ed.2d 106 (1980); see Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water District, 703 F.2d 1141, 1146 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 151 , 78 L.Ed.2d 141 (1983).
cited Cited "see" Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
D. Nev. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water District, 703 F.2d 1141 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 151 , 78 L.Ed.2d 141 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kaiser Development Co. v. City & County of Honolulu
9th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
Bishop contends that it need show only that “a public entity acting in furtherance of a public project directly and substantially interfere[d] with property rights and thereby significantly impair[ed] the value of property.” Richmond Elks, 561 F.2d at 1330 ; see also Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist., 703 F.2d 1141, 1147 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 847 , 104 S.Ct. 151 , 78 L.Ed.2d 141 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kaiser Development Company v. City And County Of Honolulu
9th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
Bishop contends that it need show only that "a public entity acting in furtherance of a public project directly and substantially interfere[d] with property rights and thereby significantly impair[ed] the value of property." Richmond Elks, 561 F.2d at 1330 ; see also Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist., 703 F.2d 1141, 1147 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 847 , 104 S.Ct. 151 , 78 L.Ed.2d 141 (1983). 15 We disagree.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Moore v. City of Costa Mesa
C.D. Cal. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See First Church, 107 S.Ct. at 2387-88; see also Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water District, 703 F.2d 1141 (9th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 847 , 104 S.Ct. 151 , 78 L.Ed.2d 141 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kaiser Development Co. v. City & County of Honolulu (2×)
D. Haw. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Martino v. Santa Clara Valley Water District, 703 F.2d 1141, 1147 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 847 , 104 S.Ct. 151 , 78 L.Ed.2d 141 (1983); Washington Water & bight Co. v. East Yolo Community Services District, 120 Cal.App.3d 389 , 174 Cal.Rptr. 612 , 616-17 (1981); Taper v. City of *931 Long Beach, 129 Cal.App.3d 590 , 181 Cal.Rptr. 169, 176-77 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The STOUFFER CORPORATION
v.
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
No. 83-34.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
104 S. Ct. 151
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Denied.