green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Multistate Legal Studies, Inc. v. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Legal & Professional Publications, Inc.
To succeed on a claim of conspiracy to monopolize, PMBR must show: “(1) ‘the existence of a combination or conspiracy to monopolize’; (2) ‘overt acts done in furtherance of the combination or conspiracy’; (3) ‘an effect upon an appreciable amount of interstate commerce’; and (4) ‘a specific intent to monopolize.’ ” TV Communications, 964 F.2d at 1026 (quoting Olsen v. Progressive Music Supply, Inc., 703 F.2d 432, 438 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 866 , 104 5.Ct. 197, 78 L.Ed.2d 172 (1983)).
cited
Cited "see"
Gonzalez v. Ritz Carlton Hotel Co. of Puerto Rico
See Patsy v. Board of Regents of the State of Florida, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 78 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re the Exxon Valdez
See In re Oil Spill by Amoco Cadiz, 699 F.2d 909, 913 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 864 , 104 S.Ct. 196 , 78 L.Ed.2d 172 (1983) (Shipwreck on the high seas is quintessential^ the kind of incident for which the distinctive doctrines and remedies of admiralty law were designed; any doubt created by the fact that the damage occurred on land is removed by the Admiralty Extension Act.); United States v. M/V Big Sam, 681 F.2d 432, 440 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1132 , 103 S.Ct. 3112 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1367 (1983) (Oil spill which resulted from collision between tug and tanker barge on nav…
cited
Cited "see"
In re Oil Spill By the \Amoco Cadiz\" off the Coast of France on March 16
See In re Oil Spill by the Amoco Cadiz off the Coast of France on March 16, 1978, 699 F.2d 909 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 864 , 104 S.Ct. 196 , 78 L.Ed.2d 172 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
1st Bank Southeast of Kenosha, Wis. v. M/V KALIDAS
See In re Oil Spill by Amoco Cadiz Off the Coast of France on March 16, 1978, 699 F.2d 909, 912-15 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 864 , 104 S.Ct. 196 , 78 L.Ed.2d 172 (1983); Leather’s Best, Inc. v. S.S.
examined
Cited "see"
Association of Independent Television Stations, Inc. v. the College Football Ass'n
(3×)
Regents of the University of California v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., 747 F.2d 511, 522 (9th Cir.1984) (Beezer, J., dissenting); see Olsen v. Progressive Music Supply, Inc., 703 F.2d 432, 437 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 866 , 104 S.Ct. 197 , 78 L.Ed.2d 172 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Somarelf v. American Bureau of Shipping
See, e.g., Amoco Cadiz, 699 F.2d 909, 915 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 864 , 104 S.Ct. 196, 78 L.Ed.2d 172 (1983) (negligent design of ship); Tebbs v. Baker-Whiteley Towing Co., 407 F.2d 1055, 1058 (4th Cir.1969) (towing contract); United N.Y.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arizona
v.
Young
v.
Young
No. 82-2075.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Consideration, Motion, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of North Carolina (1)
Ct. App. Ariz. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.