green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Suburban O'Hare Commission v. Dole
(2×)
Post, at 647 [104 S.Ct. at 2025], But the dissent merely resurrects an old argument that has already been raised and rejected before by this Court in Weinberger v. Salfi [ 422 U.S. 749 , 95 S.Ct. 2457 , 45 L.Ed.2d 522 (1975) ], supra. As we have already noted earlier, ante, at 636 [104 S.Ct. at 2022], the Court rejected the argument that the claimant in Salfi could bring his constitutional challenge to a Social Security Act.
cited
Cited "see"
Mace v. Skinner
See Green v. Brantley, 981 F.2d 514 (11th Cir.1993) and Gaunce v. de-Vincentis, 708 F.2d 1290 (7th Cir.) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 978 , 104 S.Ct. 417 , 78 L.Ed.2d 354 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
MacE v. Skinner
See Green v. Brantley, 981 F.2d 514 (11th Cir.1993) and Gaunce v. deVincentis, 708 F.2d 1290 (7th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 978 , 104 S.Ct. 417 , 78 L.Ed.2d 354 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Housing Study Group v. Kemp
Regis Paper Co. v. Marshall, 591 F.2d 612, 614 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 828 , 100 S.Ct. 55 , 62 L.Ed.2d 36 (1979); Montana Chapter of Ass’n of Civil Technicians, Inc. v. Young, 514 F.2d 1165, 1167-68 (9th Cir.1975); Wallace v. Lynn, 507 F.2d 1186, 1190-91 (D.C.Cir.1974); see also Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch, 331 U.S. 752, 772-73 , 67 S.Ct. 1493, 1503 , 91 L.Ed. 1796 (1947). 14 Furthermore, requiring exhaustion will allow the agency to develop a factual record so that judicial resolution of the constitutional issue, if necessary, will not be made in a context “dev…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gaunce
v.
DeVincentis
v.
DeVincentis
No. 83-531.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 1983.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Appeal from C. A. 7th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of cer-tiorari, certiorari denied.