green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1991 ·
…defendant compelled to give a live voice exemplar is not a witness for purposes of evolving testimonial evidence
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Taylor v. United States
(2×)
defendant compelled to give a live voice exemplar is not a witness for purposes of evolving testimonial evidence
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Sternberg v. O'NEIL
The Court upheld jurisdiction against the corporation but remanded the question of jurisdiction over the other parties. 465 U.S. at 781, 104 S.Ct. at 481-82. 30 .Subsequent to Papendick , this Court considered but did not answer the question of whether the ownership of stock in a Delaware corporation, coupled with Delaware’s in rem jurisdictional statute, would permit Delaware to exercise jurisdiction over a foreign parent corporation in a suit to cancel the stock of the subsidiary Delaware corporation that was being held by the foreign parent corporation.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Evans
See United States v. Williams, 704 F.3d 315 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S. Ct. 481 , 78 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Letitia Magini, A/K/A Tish Anderson
See United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1328 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 481 , 482, 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983); Thomas, 818 F.2d at 481 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
See United States v. Mers , 701 F.2d 1321 , 1328 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983); Cuyler v. Sullivan , 446 U.S. 335 , 348 , 100 S.Ct. 1708 , 1718 , 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael C. Pennyman
See United *107 States v. Williams, 704 F.2d 315, 321 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983) (failure to possess was not fatal to charge where defendant made a telephone call to arrange deal and arrived later with $3,400 to consummate the deal); Reeves, 794 F.2d 1101, 1105 (6th Cir.1986) (affirming conviction for attempted possession with intent to distribute cocaine based upon defendant’s “constructive possession”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roberto Ramos (87-3921), Carl Sutton, Jr. (87-3922), and Ralph Longmire (87- 3923)
See United States v. Williams, 704 F.2d 315, 321 (6th Cir.) (sufficient evidence to withstand motion for acquittal where defendant “actively solicited a narcotics sale by telephone and within a short time interval voluntarily appeared at the ... residence ... with a weapon and a substantial amount of cash to consummate the purchase_”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983); accord United States v. Manley, 632 F.2d 978, 987 (2nd Cir.1980) (sufficient evidence to support conviction for attempt to possess narcotics when the defendant was present in a residence of …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos Solomon and Katrina F. Solomon
See United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1331 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983). 52 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David Richeson, United States of America v. Mahmood Ul-Hassan
See United States v. Cina, 699 F.2d 853, 859 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Stephen Domina
(2×)
See United States v. Williams, 704 F.2d 315, 319-20 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983), in which the Court so held and thoroughly discussed the case law on the subject.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher Moscatiello, United States of America v. John M. Rooney, United States of America v. James D. Carter, United States of America v. Michael F. Murray
See United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1338-39 (11th Cir.) cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moscatiello
See United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1338-39 (11th Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Hopps v. State Board of Parole
See United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1331 (11th Cir.), reh’g en banc denied, 707 F.2d 523 , cert. denied, 104 S. Ct. 481 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sobrino v. State
See United States v. Williams, 704 F.2d 315 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983); United States v. Manley, 632 F.2d 978 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1112 , 101 S.Ct. 922 , 66 L.Ed.2d 841 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Allan Pirolli, Jose Galardo, Terry Otalora
See United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1338-39 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983) (holding that where the magistrate conducted the suppression hearing on April 22 and issued his report and recommendations on May 18, the magistrate and the district court had 30 days each during which to take pretrial motions under advisement pursuant to § 3161(h)(l)(J)). • In United States v. Mastrangelo, 733 F.2d 793 (11th Cir.1984), a motion to suppress evidence because of an alleged illegal search was referred by the magistrate to the trial court.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Multi-Management, Inc., and Warren D. Hill, and United States of America v. Multi-Management, Inc., Karl H. Herrmann, Jr., A/K/A Karl Von Herrmann, Warren D. Hill, and Eugene Smith, and Robert Monforton
See United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1328 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 481 & 482, 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983). 2 Consequently, we conclude that the trial court did not err in denying the motion by counsel to withdraw from representation of MMI.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Multi-Management, Inc.
See United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1328 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 481 & 482, 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983). 2 Consequently, we conclude that the trial court did not err in denying the motion by counsel to withdraw from representation of MMI.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Veney v. United States
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. United States, 530 A.2d 1129, 1138 (D.C.1987) ("Actual conflict will not be found, however, unless appellant can point to specific instances in the record to suggest an actual conflict or impairment of their interests.") (quoting United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1328 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Ferrante v. United States, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983)) (internal quotation marks omitted).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jeffrey A. Spaeni
See, e.g., United States v. Cina, 699 F.2d 853, 857 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Willie Wilks
See also United States v. Williams, 704 F.2d 315, 321 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983) (substantial step completed where the defendant actively solicited narcotics sale by telephone and within a short time appeared at designated location with the money to consummate the sale); United States v. Cafaro, 480 F.Supp. 511, 515 (S.D.N.Y.1979) (substantial step completed where defendant had telephone conversations with a narcotics seller who was cooperating with the government; agreed that the defendant would bring the money to the seller’s apartment th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peter John Leone
See also United States v. Williams, 704 F.2d 315, 320 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 991 , 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983); United States v. Delaplane, 778 F.2d 570, 574-76 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 104 , 93 L.Ed.2d 54 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Tom Darby, Constantine Yamanis, Vincent Calise, and Michael Yamanis
In United States v. Wooten, 688 F.2d 941 (4th Cir.1982), the court stated, "What section 3161(c)(2) does is simply to guarantee to the criminal defendant the right to a delay of at least thirty days between arraignment and trial in any circumstances." Id. at 951 (emphasis added); see also United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1333-34 (11th Cir.) (quoting Wooten with approval), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 481 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 , — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 482 , 78 L.Ed.2d 679 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cina
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-28.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia Court of … (2)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-rari denied.