green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Elijah Albert Boone, Dehlia E. Boone, Jerry Boone and Roger Swayze
See United States v. Schmidt, 711 F.2d 595, 597 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1041 , 104 S.Ct. 705 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tyson v. Keane
(Id. at 2-3.) United States v. Kupau, 781 F.2d 740, 745 (9th Cir.) (no error to exclude expert discourse analysis where the “expert sought to interpret language in ordinary usage, which the district court found would have confused, not assisted, the jury.”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 823 , 107 S.Ct. 93 , 93 L.Ed.2d 45 (1986); United States v. DeLuna, 763 F.2d 897, 912 (8th Cir.) (district court properly excluded linguistic discourse analysis expert testimony that would confuse jurors rather than assist them), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 980 , 106 S.Ct. 382 , 88 L.Ed.2d 336 (1985); see also United …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Walter H. Kupau
See United States v. Hearst, 563 F.2d 1331, 1349-50 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1000 , 98 S.Ct. 1656 , 56 L.Ed.2d 90 (1978) (exclusion of expert linguist’s testimony upheld); see also United States v. Schmidt, 711 F.2d 595, 598-99 (5th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1041 , 104 S.Ct. 705 , 79 L.Ed.2d 169 (1984) (exclusion of expert linguist’s testimony upheld).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James N. CONSTANT
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 83-621.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1984.
104 S. Ct. 705
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Denied.