green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.8 score
“the point at which the cause of action would normally accrue is the same point at which a statute of limitations would begin to run”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bey v. Williams
the point at which the cause of action would normally accrue is the same point at which a statute of limitations would begin to run
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. State
See Schultz v. State, 437 So.2d 670 (Ala.Crim.App.1983), cer t. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 213 (1984) (stop justified based on slow movement of vehicle in cotton field in area where there had been complaints of night hunting).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith Wilson Co. v. Trading & Development Establishment
Matterhorn, Inc., 763 F.2d at 868-69 (“An arbitration clause will often be ‘severable’ from the contract in which it is embedded, in the sense that it may be valid even if the rest of the contract is invalid.” (emphasis added)); see Sauer-Getriebe KG v. White Hydraulics, Inc., 715 F.2d 348, 350 (7th Cir.1983) (ordering arbitration of dispute over enforceability of contract because “[t]he agreement to arbitrate and the agreement to buy and sell motors are separate” and because plaintiff’s “promise to arbitrate was given in exchange for [defendant’s] promise to arbitrate and ea…
discussed
Cited "see"
Balsavage v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Accord Metz v. Tootsie Roll Indus., Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Chrysler Workers Ass’n. v. Chrysler Corp., 834 F.2d 573, 578 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2017 , 100 L.Ed.2d 604 (1988); Shapiro v. Cook United, Inc., 762 F.2d 49, 51 (6th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnnie Will Johnson v. Artim Transportation System, Inc., and Teamsters Union Local 142, Defendants
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 303 (7th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnnie Bonds v. The Coca-Cola Company
(2×)
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ambrose Daigle v. Gulf State Utilities Co., Local Union Number 2286
Hersh v. Allen Products Co., Inc., 789 F.2d 230, 232 (3d Cir.1986); see, Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984), citing, Hungerford v. United States, 307 F.2d 99,102 (9th Cir.1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ina King v. The New York Telephone Company, Inc., and the Telephone Traffic Union (New York)
(2×)
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Illis v. United Steelworkers, 615 F.Supp. 1081 , 1085 n. 3 (D.V.1.1985); Hull v. Local 414, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 601 F.Supp. 869, 873 (N.D.Ind.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
H. Jack Frandsen v. Brotherhood Of Railway, Airline And Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express And Station Employees
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll, 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984) 9 BRAC relies on a footnote in Schultz v. Owens-Illinois, 696 F.2d 505 , 514 n. 12 (7th Cir.1982), for the proposition that in a contract negotiation duty of fair representation case, a union member's pursuit of internal union remedies can never afford complete relief.
cited
Cited "see"
Frandsen v. Brotherhood of Railway
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll, 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984). .
cited
Cited "see"
Moody v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co.
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 305-06 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 104 S.Ct. 976 (1984); West v. ITT Continental Baking Co., 683 F.2d 845 (4th Cir. 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerome Gray v. Del Monte Corp. American Federation of Grain Millers, Local 359 and American Federation of Grain Millers International (Afl-Cio)
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, ---- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Santos v. District Council of New York City, 619 F.2d 963, 969 (2d Cir. 1980).
cited
Cited "see"
David D. Chandler v. Oberle-Jordre Co., Inc International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, ---- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United Independent Flight Officers, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc., & Air Line Pilots Association, International
See Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Storck v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 600, 712 F.2d 1194 (7th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Herrera v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers
Demars v. General Dynamic Corp., 779 F.2d 95, 99 (1st Cir.1985) (employee failed to make meaningful inquiry for nearly three years after grievance filed; statute of limitations on § 301 hybrid suit not tolled); see also Metz v. Tootsie Roll Indus., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,660 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation v. Lawrence E. Salvano and James B. Coon
See, e.g., Sauer-Getriebe KG v. White Hydraulics, Inc., 715 F.2d 348, 351-52 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Teradyne, Inc. v. Mostek Corp., 797 F.2d 43, 47-51 (1st Cir.1986); Blumenthal v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 910 F.2d 1049, 1052-53 (2d Cir.1990); Roso-Lino Beverage Distributors, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 749 F.2d 124, 125 (2d Cir.1984); Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Bradley, 756 F.2d 1048 (4th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sewell v. GENSTAR GYPSUM PRODUCTS CO.
See also discussion in Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984), citing, inter alia, Hungerford v. United States, 307 F.2d 99, 102 (9th Cir.1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R. Dement J.H. Hines V.N. Meekins L.A. Koenig v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company United Transportation Union
(2×)
Compare Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984) (union refused to process grievance); Demars, 779 F.2d at 98-99 (union told plaintiff "it had done 'all [it] could do' "); see King, 785 F.2d at 35 (distinguishing situation in Metz ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lacina v. G-K Trucking
See also Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983) (considering what reasonably diligent plaintiff would have discovered in determining accrual date), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984).III 17 Because the facts which caused the district court to impose sanctions are not in dispute, we review the district court's conclusion that plaintiffs' counsel violated Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 de novo, Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, 780 F.2d 823, 828 (9th Cir.1986), and reverse.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lacina v. G-K Trucking
See also Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983) (considering what reasonably diligent plaintiff would have discovered in determining accrual date), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
No. 84-3618
See, e.g., Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Former Frigidaire Employees Association v. International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, Local 801, 573 F.Supp. 59 (S.D.Ohio 1983), affirmed sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sevako v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.
See, e.g., Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1070 , 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984); Former Frigidaire Employees Association v. International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, Local 801, 573 F.Supp. 59 (S.D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jose Shapiro v. Cook United, Inc., International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local No. 507
See also Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., 715 F.2d 299, 304 (7th Cir.1983) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 976 , 79 L.Ed.2d 214 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Metz
v.
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.
v.
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.
No. 83-819.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.