green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.6 score
“agreement involved must include the vital element of agreeing to commit the predicate acts of racketeering”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Meeks
See United States v. Freeman, 685 F.2d 942 (5th Cir.1982); Palmer v. State, 426 So.2d 950 (Ala.Crim.App.1983); but see United States v. Apker, 705 F.2d 293 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984) (declining to extend the warrant severance doctrine to allow seizure of unspecified items in plain view).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Saccoccia
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
the rico forfeiture is in personam: a punishment imposed on a guilty defendant.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Police Retirement System v. Midwest Inv. Ad. Serv.
agreement involved must include the vital element of agreeing to commit the predicate acts of racketeering
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryan Kirby Barrett, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gerardo Acevedo, Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
See United States v. Apker, 705 F.2d 293, 305 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984). 7 Moreover, we believe that more recent Supreme Court cases reflect less willingness to recognize First Amendment interests in criminal cases.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Susan H. McDougal
See United States v. Apker, 705 F.2d 293, 308 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
DePugh v. Penning
See United States v. Apker, 705 F.2d 293, 301 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); United States v. Aquilar, 883 F.2d 662 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 751 , 112 L.Ed.2d 771 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Layne
See United States v. Apker, 705 F.2d 293, 301 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); United States v. Aquilar, 883 F.2d 662 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1046 , 111 S.Ct. 751 , 112 L.Ed.2d 771 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonard A. Pelullo
See United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322 , 1345 & nn. 84-85 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael R. Mabry, United States of America v. Calvin Cornelius Edwards, United States of America v. Mark Anthony Clearman, United States of America v. David L. Edwards
See United States v. Apker, 705 F.2d 293, 309 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); United States v. Kurck, 552 F.2d 1321, 1323 (8th Cir.1977). 5 In this case, the shotguns were found at Mabry's home.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mabry
See United States v. Apker, 705 F.2d 293, 309 (8th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); United States v. Kurck, 552 F.2d 1321, 1323 (8th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co., Cross-Appellants v. Dresser Industries, Cross-Appellees, and Bj-Titan Services Company, Defendants-Third Party Cross-Appellees v. Gary Lancaster, A/K/A Gary \Zeke\" Lancaster
See United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1332-33 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984). 10 The acts of the servicing entity, or the partnership, cannot, for RICO purposes, be attributed vicariously to the individual partners.
cited
Cited "see"
Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co. v. Dresser Industries
See United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1332-33 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. California Publishers Liquidating Corp.
United States v. Busher, 817 F.2d at 1412-3 (footnotes and citations omitted); see United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1349 (5th Cir.1983) (discussing mandatory nature of forfeiture under Section 1963), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. California Publishers Liquidating Corp.
United States v. Busher, 817 F.2d at 1412-3 (footnotes and citations omitted); see United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1349 (5th Cir.1983) (discussing mandatory nature of forfeiture under Section 1963), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rastelli
See United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1341-42 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rastelli
See United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1341-42 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Feldman
Markus, supra, at 1111; see United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1349 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth A. Possick, A/K/A Kenneth Roberts
See United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1347 (5th Cir.1983) (“Mare-bones pleading” suffices so long as defend *341 ant put on notice that government seeks forfeiture of a particular property), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
The United States v. Hilmer Burdette Sandini, Ernest G. Rockwell, George White Kost, Ronald Paul Urban, Carol Ann Hineman Sandini, Sandra Jean Sandini, Michael Frawley, David Thompson, George Strickler, Sherman John Glunt, Santos Ruiz, Robert Kotula, Eugene Anthony Gesuale, Robert Maker, Vincent Ciraolo, Richard Moody, Edward Mills, Rex Foster, Kenneth Hill, Harry Jessup, Rose Jessup. Appeal of Ronald Paul Urban. The United States v. Hilmer Burdette Sandini A/K/A H.B. Sandini, Sandy, the Old Man George White Kost A/K/A George Kostishach, Maitre D', Richard Reed Ronald Paul Urban. Appeal of Ronald Paul Urban
See United States v. U.S. Currency, 626 F.2d 11 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 993 , 101 S.Ct. 529 , 66 L.Ed.2d 290 (1980). 26 In United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984), the court of appeals suggested that the jury should not consider the forfeiture issues until it has returned guilty verdicts.
discussed
Cited "see"
Andreo v. Friedlander, Gaines, Cohen, Rosenthal & Rosenberg
For liability under that section, the offending party “must have objectively manifested an agreement to participate, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of an enterprise through the commission of two or more predicate acts.” Andrea, 651 F.Supp. at 883 ; Laterza v. American Broadcasting Co., 581 F.Supp. 408, 413 (S.D.N.Y.1984); accord United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1341 (5th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); United States v. Melton, 689 F.2d 679, 683 (7th Cir.1982); see also United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), ce…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1348 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1348 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andreo v. FRIEDLANDER, GAINES, COHEN, ETC.
For liability under this section, the offending party “must have objectively manifested an agreement to participate, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of an enterprise through the commission of two or more predicate acts.” Laterza v. American Broadcasting Co., 581 F.Supp. 408, 413 (S.D.N.Y.1984); accord United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1341 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); United States v. Melton, 689 F.2d 679, 683 (7th Cir.1982); Ruling on Motions to Dismiss, at 23; see also United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Ci…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ianniello
See United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322 , 1331 n. 11 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ianniello
See United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322 , 1331 n. 11 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hatton
See United States v. Apker, 705 F.2d 293, 307 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); United States v. Durant, 730 F.2d 1180 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, *234 — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 149 , 83 L.Ed.2d 91 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lusk
See cases cited in United States v. Apker, 705 F.2d 293, 310 (8th Cir.1983) (Bright, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 80 L.Ed.2d 538 (1984); Sovereign News Co. v. United States, 690 F.2d 569 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); United States v. Jacob, 657 F.2d 49 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 942 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Annot., 69 A.L.R.Fed. 527-532 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tanner
See, e.g., United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1347 (5th Cir.1983) ("Barebones pleading suffices so long as it puts the defendant on notice that the government seeks forfeiture and identifies the assets subject to forfeiture with sufficient specificity to permit the defendant to marshal evidence in [his] defense.”) (footnote omitted), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clarence Crockett and Albert Tocco
Co. v. Local No. 705, 904 F.2d 391, 393 (7th Cir.1990); United States v. Horak, 833 F.2d 1235, 1239 (7th Cir.1987); United States v. Blackwood, 768 F.2d 131, 137-38 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 569 , 88 L.Ed.2d 554 (1985); see also United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1331-33 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edwin Elgersma, United States of America v. Edwin Elgersma
(2×)
See also United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1348 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); United States v. Mating, 737 F.Supp. 684, 705 (D.Mass.1990) (bifurcation promotes fairness and efficiency)) af f'd United States v. Richard, 943 F.2d 115 (1st Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Habicht
See, e.g., United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1333-34 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984) (rejecting post-conviction challenge to the specificity of an indictment charging RICO violations under the standard three-part test of sufficiency elucidated in Hamling).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ferrara
See, e.g., United States v. Apker, 705 F.2d 293, 301 (8th Cir.1983) (First Amendment rights are implicated, but do not invalidate search relating to “Hells Angels”), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984); United States v. Rubio, 727 F.2d 786, 792 (9th Cir.1984) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Orrin Shaid, Jr.
(2×)
The court stated that "[w]here sufficiency is at issue, a finding that the accused acted recklessly may be enough to sustain a jury verdict, because a jury may properly infer the requisite intent." Adamson, 700 F.2d at 962 (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1355 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984) (explaining Adamson ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Horak, and United States of America v. John Horak
United States v. Blackwood, 768 F.2d 131, 138 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 569 , 88 L.Ed.2d 554 (1985); see also United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1333 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harold Conn
Compare United States v. Cauble, 706 *425 F.2d 1322,1333 n. 24 (5th Cir.1983) (government need prove only that the racketeering acts affected the enterprise in some fashion), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984), with United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174, 185-86 (4th Cir.) (government must prove that the affairs of the enterprise are benefited or advanced by the racketeering activities), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857 , 102 S.Ct. 307 , 70 L.Ed.2d 152 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kaye
Compare Bennett v. Berg, 710 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 527 , 78 L.Ed.2d 710 (1983) (defendant’s participation in the operation or management of the enterprise) with United States v. Cauble, 706 F.2d 1322, 1332-33 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 996 , 79 L.Ed.2d 229 (1984) (defendant’s use of his position to commit predicate acts, plus the effects of those acts on the enterprise).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Record Data, Inc.
v.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Neal, Real Parties in Interest)
v.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Neal, Real Parties in Interest)
No. 83-513.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Missouri (1) · D. Rhode Island (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.