Am. Bearing Co. v. Litton Indus., Inc., 469 U.S. 854 (1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Am. Bearing Co. v. Litton Indus., Inc., 469 U.S. 854 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
81 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Loeffel Steel Products, Inc. v. Delta Brands, Inc. (ilnd, 2005-07-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Loeffel Steel Products, Inc. v. Delta Brands, Inc.
N.D. Ill. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 540 F.Supp. 1163, 1173 (E.D.Pa.1982), aff'd on other grounds, 729 F.2d 943 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984); Lithuanian Commerce Corp. Ltd. v. Sara Lee Hosiery, 179 F.R.D. 450 (D.N.J.1998)(assumptions of a certified public accountant with several advanced degrees). 18 .
discussed Cited "see" Benjamin v. Aroostook Medical Center
D. Me. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
While the Court remains uncertain as to the exact nature of Dr. Benjamin’s § 14 claim, it is nonetheless clear that he has not established that TAMC’s actions either “sub *969 stantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce.” 15 U.S.C. § 14 ; see Black Gold, Ltd. v. Rockwool Industries, Inc., 729 F.2d 676, 684 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 113 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Systemcare, Inc. v. Wang Laboratories, Inc.
D. Colo. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Black Gold, Ltd. v. Rockwool Industries, Inc., 729 F.2d 676, 686 (10th Cir.), rehearing denied, 732 F.2d 779, 780 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 113 (1984); Smith Machinery Co., Inc. v. Hesston Corp., 878 F.2d 1290, 1294 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1073 , 110 S.Ct. 1119 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1026 (1990); Will v. Comprehensive Accounting Corp., 776 F.2d 665, 669-670 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1129 , 106 S.Ct. 1659 , 90 L.Ed.2d 201 (1986).
cited Cited "see" Cassidy Podell Lynch, Inc. v. Snydergeneral Corporation Snydergeneral Corporation (\Snydergeneral\")
unknown court · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Indus., 729 F.2d 943, 948 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Cassidy Podell Lynch, Inc. v. SnyderGeneral Corp.
unknown court · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Indus., 729 F.2d 943, 948 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Motor Carriers Labor Advisory Council v. Trucking Management, Inc.
E.D. Pa. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 729 F.2d 943, 949 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Anesthesia Advantage, Inc. v. Metz Group
D. Colo. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Black Gold, Ltd., v. Rockwool Industries, Inc., 732 F.2d 779 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 113 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Roebuck, Dr. James R. v. Drexel University
3rd Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Industries, 729 F.2d 943, 948 (3d Cir.) (“‘The authority to grant a new trial ... is confided almost entirely to the exercise of discretion on the part of the trial court,’ and will only be disturbed if the district court abused that discretion.”) (quoting Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 36 , 101 S.Ct. 188, 191 , 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Package Shop, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
D.N.J. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Industries, 729 F.2d 943, 948 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984); Deaktor v. Fox Grocery Co., 475 F.2d 1112, 1116 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
cited Cited "see" Robert J. Will, Cross-Appellees v. Comprehensive Accounting Corporation, Cross
7th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Black Gold, Ltd. v. Rockwool Industries, Inc., 732 F.2d 779, 780 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 113 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" World Of Sleep, Inc. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Company
10th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Black Gold, Ltd. v. Rockwool Industries, Inc., 729 F.2d 676, 685-86 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 113 (1984); see also Black Gold, Ltd. v. Rockwool Industries, Inc., 732 F.2d 779 (10th Cir.1984) (opinion on rehearing).
discussed Cited "see" World of Sleep, Inc. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Co.
10th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Black Gold, Ltd. v. Rockwool Industries, Inc., 729 F.2d 676, 685-86 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 113 (1984); see also Black Gold, Ltd. v. Rockwool Industries, Inc., 732 F.2d 779 (10th Cir.1984) (opinion on rehearing).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery
D.N.J. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See generally ADVO, Inc., 136 F.3d at 1143 (affirming exclusion of expert report on lost profits from joint business venture based on the report’s unsupported assumptions regarding, inter alia, the product’s penetration into new markets); see also American Bearing Co., Inc. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 540 F.Supp. 1163, 1173 (E.D.Pa.1982) (granting new trial where testimony of damages expert should have been excluded because expert’s “estimated market shares were based on his oft repeated assumption that American Bearing was offering a better product, with better service, at a lower pri…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Clamp-All Corporation v. Cast Iron Soil Pipe Institute
1st Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
(The district court properly refused to allow plaintiff's expert to present precise market share figures because that expert based his opinion significantly upon a few unmemorialized telephone calls, and estimated the reliability of his model as between “1 percent and 99 percent,” Fed.R.Evid. 403; see, e.g., American Bearing Company, Inc. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 540 F.Supp. 1163 (E.D.Pa. *491 1982), aff'd, 729 F.2d 943 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).) That being so, the same reasons that have led us to find appellant’s case inadequate i…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation"
E.D.N.Y · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Meller v. Heil Co., 745 F.2d 1297 (10th Cir.1984) (no error to exclude evidence that plaintiff who was crushed in an accident stored hashish pipes in the vehicle; low probative value); see also American Bearing Co., Inc. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 729 F.2d 943 , 950 n. 14 (3d Cir.) (“[a]s the district court correctly found, the speculation and unfounded assumptions underlying [the expert’s] testimony decreased its probative value, perhaps to the level of the gossamer.”) (dictum ), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American Bearing Co., Inc.
v.
Litton Industries, Inc.
No. 84-65.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
469 U.S. 854
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.