green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Loeffel Steel Products, Inc. v. Delta Brands, Inc.
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 540 F.Supp. 1163, 1173 (E.D.Pa.1982), aff'd on other grounds, 729 F.2d 943 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984); Lithuanian Commerce Corp. Ltd. v. Sara Lee Hosiery, 179 F.R.D. 450 (D.N.J.1998)(assumptions of a certified public accountant with several advanced degrees). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Benjamin v. Aroostook Medical Center
While the Court remains uncertain as to the exact nature of Dr. Benjamin’s § 14 claim, it is nonetheless clear that he has not established that TAMC’s actions either “sub *969 stantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce.” 15 U.S.C. § 14 ; see Black Gold, Ltd. v. Rockwool Industries, Inc., 729 F.2d 676, 684 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 113 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Merchant v. Lymon
See Brooks v. Brattleboro Memorial Hosp., 958 F.2d 525 , 530-531 (2d Cir.1992) (citing Crane v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 731 F.2d 1042, 1050 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 179 , 83 L.Ed.2d 114 (1984)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Systemcare, Inc. v. Wang Laboratories, Inc.
See Black Gold, Ltd. v. Rockwool Industries, Inc., 729 F.2d 676, 686 (10th Cir.), rehearing denied, 732 F.2d 779, 780 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 113 (1984); Smith Machinery Co., Inc. v. Hesston Corp., 878 F.2d 1290, 1294 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1073 , 110 S.Ct. 1119 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1026 (1990); Will v. Comprehensive Accounting Corp., 776 F.2d 665, 669-670 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1129 , 106 S.Ct. 1659 , 90 L.Ed.2d 201 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Cassidy Podell Lynch, Inc. v. SnyderGeneral Corp.
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Indus., 729 F.2d 943, 948 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Motor Carriers Labor Advisory Council v. Trucking Management, Inc.
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 729 F.2d 943, 949 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Anesthesia Advantage, Inc. v. Metz Group
See Black Gold, Ltd., v. Rockwool Industries, Inc., 732 F.2d 779 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 113 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roebuck, Dr. James R. v. Drexel University
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Industries, 729 F.2d 943, 948 (3d Cir.) (“‘The authority to grant a new trial ... is confided almost entirely to the exercise of discretion on the part of the trial court,’ and will only be disturbed if the district court abused that discretion.”) (quoting Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 36 , 101 S.Ct. 188, 191 , 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gregory v. Union Pacific Railroad
See DuBose v. Kansas City Southern Railway, 729 F.2d 1026, 1028 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 179 , 83 L.Ed.2d 113 (1984), (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 899, comments c & e (1977)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Package Shop, Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
See American Bearing Co. v. Litton Industries, 729 F.2d 943, 948 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984); Deaktor v. Fox Grocery Co., 475 F.2d 1112, 1116 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Weaver
Accord Marshall v. Radiology Assoc., supra. On remand, the physician in Hanzlik v. Paustian, 216 Neb. 575, 344 N.W.2d 649 (1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S. Ct. 179 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery
See generally ADVO, Inc., 136 F.3d at 1143 (affirming exclusion of expert report on lost profits from joint business venture based on the report’s unsupported assumptions regarding, inter alia, the product’s penetration into new markets); see also American Bearing Co., Inc. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 540 F.Supp. 1163, 1173 (E.D.Pa.1982) (granting new trial where testimony of damages expert should have been excluded because expert’s “estimated market shares were based on his oft repeated assumption that American Bearing was offering a better product, with better service, at a lower pri…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joann's Launder Center, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
Ed. 2d 193 , 101 S. Ct. 188 (1980); see also American Bearing Co. v. Litton Indus., Inc., 729 F.2d 943, 948 (3d Cir.) (referring to trial court's discretionary power to grant new trial), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brooks v. Brattleboro Memorial Hospital
See, e.g., Crane v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 731 F.2d 1042, 1050 (2d Cir.) (where elements of a claim are determined separately in special interrogatories, “error with respect to one issue will ordinarily not constitute reason to retry an issue that was separately determined”) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 179 , 83 L.Ed.2d 114 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brooks v. Brattleboro Memorial Hospital
See, e.g., Crane v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 731 F.2d 1042, 1050 (2d Cir.) (where elements of a claim are determined separately in special interrogatories, "error with respect to one issue will ordinarily not constitute reason to retry an issue that was separately determined") (emphasis added), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 179 , 83 L.Ed.2d 114 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clamp-All Corporation v. Cast Iron Soil Pipe Institute
(The district court properly refused to allow plaintiff's expert to present precise market share figures because that expert based his opinion significantly upon a few unmemorialized telephone calls, and estimated the reliability of his model as between “1 percent and 99 percent,” Fed.R.Evid. 403; see, e.g., American Bearing Company, Inc. v. Litton Industries, Inc., 540 F.Supp. 1163 (E.D.Pa. *491 1982), aff'd, 729 F.2d 943 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 854 , 105 S.Ct. 178 , 83 L.Ed.2d 112 (1984).) That being so, the same reasons that have led us to find appellant’s case inadequate i…
DeGregorio
v.
Weaver, Administrator, Small Business Administration
v.
Weaver, Administrator, Small Business Administration
No. 84-57.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.