green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Advent Systems Limited, in No. 90-1069 v. Unisys Corporation, in No. 90-1070
See Pennsylvania Dental Ass’n. v. Medical Service Ass’n., 745 F.2d 248, 262 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1016 , 105 S.Ct. 2021 , 85 L.Ed.2d 303 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Shaw ex rel. Strain v. Strackhouse
See Pennsylvania Dental Association v. Medical Service Association of Pennsylvania, 745 F.2d 248, 262 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1016 , 105 S.Ct. 2021 , 85 L.Ed.2d 303 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Shaw v. Strackhouse
See Pennsylvania Dental Association v. Medical Service Association of Pennsylvania, 745 F.2d 248, 262 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1016 , 105 S.Ct. 2021 , 85 L.Ed.2d 303 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.
See Pennsylvania Dental Ass’n v. Medical Service Ass’n, 745 F.2d 248, 260 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1016 , 105 S.Ct. 2021 , 85 L.Ed.2d 303 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tasty Baking Co. v. Ralston Purina, Inc.
On the other hand, as Judge Wyzanski has explained, where a company “has not over 50% of the share of the market, ... [it] has not such market power as to furnish a basis for a conclusion that it has monopolized the field.” U.S. v. United Shoe Machine Corp., 110 F.Supp. 295, 346 (D.Mass.1953), affd per curiam, 347 U.S. 521 , 74 S.Ct. 699 , 98 L.Ed. 910 (1954); accord Domed Stadium Hotel, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 732 F.2d 480, 489 (5th Cir. 1984); see also Pennsylvania Dental Ass’n v. Medical Service Ass’n of Pennsylvania, 745 F.2d 248, 261 (3d Cir.1984), cert, denied, 471 U.S. 1016 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lilley v. Dow Chemical Co.
Merit Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 569 F.2d 666, 671-73 (D.C.Cir.1977) (“To hold that Rule 703 prevents a court from granting summary judgment against a party who relies solely on an expert’s opinion that has no more basis in or out of the record than [this expert’s] * * * would seriously undermine the policies of Rule 56.”); see also Pennsylvania Dental Association v. Medical Service Association, 745 F.2d 248, 262 (3d Cir.1984) (affirming exclusion of conclusory expert affidavit not based on evidence in the record), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2021 , 85 L.Ed.2d 303 (1985); …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation
Merit Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 569 F.2d 666, 671-73 (D.C.Cir.1977) ("To hold that Rule 703 prevents a court from granting summary judgment against a party who relies solely on an expert's opinion that has no more basis in or out of the record than [this expert's] * * * would seriously undermine the policies of Rule 56."); see also Pennsylvania Dental Association v. Medical Service Association, 745 F.2d 248, 262 (3d Cir.1984) (affirming exclusion of conclusory expert affidavit not based on evidence in the record), cert. denied, ___ *1282 U.S. ___, 105 S.Ct. 2021 , 85 L.Ed.2d 303 (1985); …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Port Terminal Railroad Assn.
v.
Sims
v.
Sims
No. 84-1289.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 1985.
Published
Ct. App. Tex., 1st Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.