green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.7 score
“mjotions to separate the issues of liability and damages are to be granted by the court on a case-by-case basis only when the separation will result in judicial economy and will not unduly prejudice any party.”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Spectra-Physics Lasers, Inc. v. Uniphase Corp.
mjotions to separate the issues of liability and damages are to be granted by the court on a case-by-case basis only when the separation will result in judicial economy and will not unduly prejudice any party.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Garrudo
See United States v. Jaramillo, 745 F.2d 1245 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1066 , 105 S.Ct. 2142 , 85 L.Ed.2d 499 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,971 United States of America v. Vernon Robert Lindholm, Jr.
See United States v. Beery, 678 F.2d 856 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1066 , 105 S.Ct. 2142 , 85 L.Ed.2d 499 (1985) (even if defendant had considered bankruptcy proceeding to be invalid, that would not preclude convicting him of concealing assets from receiver and trustee in bankruptcy). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clifton Cameron and Paul Tinson
See United States v. Jaramillo, 745 F.2d 1245, 1249 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1066 , 105 S.Ct. 2142 , 85 L.Ed.2d 499 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward E. Garrett
See United States v. Beery, 678 F.2d 856, 859-60 (10th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 105 S.Ct. 2142 , 85 *662 L.Ed.2d 499 (1985); cf. United States v. Helstoski, 635 F.2d 200, 203-05 (3d Cir.1980) (Costello does not prevent a court from looking behind an indictment to determine if a grand jury violated speech and debate clause).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cerceda
See, e.g., United States v. Jaramillo, 745 F.2d 1245, 1248 (9th Cir.1984) (judge indicted while presiding over criminal trial properly recused under § 455(a)), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1066 , 105 S.Ct. 2142 , 85 L.Ed.2d 499 (1985); In re United States, 666 F.2d 690, 695 (1st Cir.1981) (fact that district court judge had close relationship with governor and defendant, a former state senator, was chairman of legislative committee that investigated governor and was reportedly helpful and fact that judge had been involved to some extent in that investigation no basis for recusal); Laxalt v. McClatc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angel Cerceda, United States of America v. Courtney Ricardo Alford, A.K.A. \Rickey
See, e.g., United States v. Jaramillo, 745 F.2d 1245, 1248 (9th Cir.1984) (judge indicted while presiding over criminal trial properly recused under § 455(a)), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1066 , 105 S.Ct. 2142 , 85 L.Ed.2d 499 (1985); In re United States, 666 F.2d 690, 695 (1st Cir.1981) (fact that district court judge had close relationship with governor and defendant, a former state senator, was chairman of legislative committee that investigated governor and was reportedly helpful and fact that judge had been involved to some extent in that investigation no basis for recusal); Laxalt v. McClatc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cerceda
See, e.g., United States v. Jaramillo, 745 F.2d 1245, 1248 (9th Cir.1984) (judge indicted while presiding over criminal trial properly recused under § 455(a)), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1066 , 105 S.Ct. 2142 , 85 L.Ed.2d 499 (1985); In re United States, 666 F.2d 690, 695 (1st Cir.1981) (fact that district court judge had close relationship with governor and defendant, a former state senator, was chairman of legislative committee that investigated governor and was reportedly helpful and fact that judge had been involved to some extent in that investigation no basis for recusal); Laxalt v. McClatc…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.
v.
Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.
No. 84-1510.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 29, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. California (1)
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.